Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:15:22.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards a national training scheme for England and the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

John Collis*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology & Prehistory, University of Sheffield, Northgate House, West Street, Sheffield S1 4ET, England, [email protected]

Abstract

Archaeology in Britain is going through one of its periodic ‘crises’, but for once it is not a crisis of funding, but one rather brought on by success, with more money, more posts and more archaeology. Much of the new money emanates from Developer Funding; PPG-16 (DoE 1990), brought out by the Department of the Environment in the wake of a European Directive on the need to conserve the historic environment, requires developers, where possible, to preserve archaeological sites, and where not, to preserve by record, i.e. to excavate. Roles were split with, on the one side, local government having ‘curatorial responsibility’ to maintain Sites and Monuments Records (SMRs) and to advise on planning and development; and on the other, independent ‘archaeological units’ to carry out the work.

Type
Special section: Archaeology in education
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitchison, K. 1999. Profiling the profession: a survey of archaeological jobs and job profiles in the UK. London: Institute of Field Archaeologists/Council for British Archaeology/English Heritage.Google Scholar
Aitchison, K. Forthcoming. Survey of archaeological specialists. London: English Heritage/Institute of Field Archaeologists/Museum of London Specialist Services.Google Scholar
Barker, G.W.W. (ed.). Forthcoming. Benchmarking archaeology. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.Google Scholar
Bishop, M., Collis, J. & Hinton, P.. 1999. A future for archaeologists: professional training a career structure in archaeology, The Archaeologist 35: 1416.Google Scholar
Chitty, G. 1999. Preliminary review of archaeology training. London: Archaeology Training Forum/English Heritage.Google Scholar
Collis, J.R. 1995. Celts, power and politics: whither Czech archaeology? in Kuna, M. & Venclová, N. (ed.), Whither archaeology? Papers in honour ofEvzen Neustupnf. 8292. Prague: Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Collis, J.R. Forthcoming. L’avenir de la recherche archéologique française sur l’âge du Fer, in Maranski, D. (ed.), Actes du XVIIe Colloque de l’Association Française pour l’Etude de l’Age du Fer, Nevers, mai 1993.Google Scholar
Collis, J. & Hinton, P.. 1998. Training, training and Ó • 0~ÂÎËÂ, The Archaeologist 31: 1517.Google Scholar
DoE. 1990. Planning Policy Guide 16. London: Department of the Environment.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. 1990. Professional training for archaeologists: the questionnaire, The Field Archaeologist 19: 244.Google Scholar
Henson, D. (ed.). 1999. Guide to archaeology in higher education. York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
IFA. 1999. Institute of Field Archaeologists; Yearbook and directory of Members 1998. Reading: Institute of Field Archaeologists.Google Scholar
Moloney, R. 1998. Practitioner survey 1997, The Archaeologist 32: 1516.Google Scholar
Olivier, A. 1996. Frameworks for our past: a review of research frameworks, strategies and perceptions. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Richards, J. 1987. Archaeology in the universities: IFA submission to the UGC Arts Sub-Committee Working Group, The Field Archaeologist 7: 978.Google Scholar
SCAUM. 1999. Occasional paper: Archaeology and employment. Standing Conference of Archaeological Unit Managers.Google Scholar
Turner, R. 1999. Jobs in British archaeology 1998, The Archaeologist 34: 1214.Google Scholar
Wood, J. 1994. CPD: what’s new about it? The Field Archaeologist 20: 41011.Google Scholar