Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:58:20.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social change in the Later Neolithic of Central Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

N. J. Starling
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Profound changes occurred in central and northern Europe towards the end of the 3rd millennium bcX, when a uniform pattern of settlement, burial and material culture-the Corded Ware complexreplaced the diversity of the middle neolithic groups of the TRB (or Funnel Beaker Culture). Collective graves and large settlement sites gave way to individual burials in a largely dispersed pattern of settlement based on small sites. This was accompanied by a spread of sites into hitherto uncolonized areas, and a greater variety of locations used for settlement. This major change might at first seem to indicate a complete collapse of the earlier system, with an undifferentiated pattern replacing the apparent beginnings of hierarchies indicated by the Middle Neolithic. Kristiansen ( I 982) has recently suggested for Denmark that the middle neolithic system disintegrated, fitting a model of cyclical tribal development. It is suggested here, however, that the transformation of the middle neolithic pattern is better seen as a changed structure, which does not involve concepts such as disintegration or collapse, but marks an important shift in the organization of neolithic societies.

Type
Articles
Information
Antiquity , Volume 59 , Issue 225 , March 1985 , pp. 30 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behrens, H. W. 1964. Die neolithische-fröhmetallzeitliche Tierskelettfunde der Alten Welt (Berlin).Google Scholar
Behrens, H. W. 1973. Die Jungsteinzeit im Mittelelbe-Saale-Gebiet (Berlin).Google Scholar
Behrens, H. W. 1981a. The first 'Woodhenge' in Middle Europe, Antiquity, LV, 172—178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, H. W. 1981b. Der Walternienburger und der Bernburger Keramikstil und der Walternienburg-Bernburg Kultur, Jahresschrift fur mitteldeutsche Vorgeschichte, LXIII, 11-16.Google Scholar
Behrens, H. W. Schröter, E.. 1980. Siedlungen und Gräber der Trichterbecherkultur und Schnurkeramik (Berlin).Google Scholar
Boelicke, U. 1976/77. Das neolithische Erdwerk Urmitz, Acta Praehistorica et Archaeologica, 7/8, 73-121.Google Scholar
Burgess, C. (ed.). Forthcoming. Enclosures and defences in the Neolithic of Western Europe (Proceedings of Conference held at Newcastle upon Tyne, January 1984).Google Scholar
Earle, T. K. 1978. Economic and social organisation of a complex chiefdom: the Halela district, Kaua'i, Hawaii (Michigan).Google Scholar
Fischer, U. 1956. Die Gräber der Steinzeit im Saalegebiet (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, P. 1958. Die vor-und frühgeschichtlichen Burgwälle der Bezirke Halle und Magdeburg (Berlin).Google Scholar
Howell, J. M. 1983. Settlement and economy in neolithic Northern France (Oxford, British Archaeological Reports S157).Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. 1982. The formation of tribal systems in later European prehistory: Northern Europe 4000— 500 bc, in (eds) Renfrew, C., Rowlands , M. J. Segraves, B. A., Theory and explanation in archaeology (New York), 241—279.Google Scholar
Madsen, T. 1982. Settlement systems of early agricultural societies in East Jutland, Denmark: a regional study of change, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1, 197—236.Google Scholar
Mania, D. 1973. Eiszeitliche Landschaftsentwicklung im Kartenbild, dargestellt am Beispiel des mittleren Elbe-Saale-Gebietes, Jahresschrift für mitteldeutsche Vorgeschichte, LVII, 17—48.Google Scholar
Mercer, R. 1980. Hambledon Hill: a neolithic landscape (Edinburgh).Google Scholar
Müller, D. W. Stahlhofen, H., 1981. Zwei Kollektivgräber der Bernburger Kultur aus dem Nordharzvorland, Jahresschrift für mitteldeutsche Vorgeschichte, LXIII, 27-65.Google Scholar
Müller, H.-H. 1978. Tierreste aus einer Siedlung der Bernburger Gruppe bei Halle >(Saale), Jahresschrift für mitteldeutsche Vorgeschichte, 62, 203—20.Google Scholar
Preuss, J. 1980. Die altmarkische Gruppe der Tiefstichkeramik (Berlin).Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1973. Monuments, mobilization and social Organization in neolithic Wessex, in (ed.) Renfrew, C., The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory (London), 539-558.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. D. 1968. Tribesmen (New York).Google Scholar
Schlette, F. 1963. Grabungen an der befestigten Siedlung der Trichterbecherkultur auf dem Steinkuhlenberg bei Derenburg, Kr. Wernigerode, Ausgrabungen und Funde, 8, 22–4.Google Scholar
Schröter, E. 1972. Zur Ausdehnung der Befestigung auf der namengebenden Fundstelle der Salzmünder Kultur, Ausgrabungen und Funde, 17, 17-20.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. Tilley, C.. 1982. Ideology, symbolic power and ritual communication: a reinterpretation of neolithic mortuary practices, in (ed.) Hodder, I., Symbolic and structural archaeology (Cambridge), 129-154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shennan, S. J. 1977. Bell Beakers and their contexts in Central Europe: a new approach (Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge).Google Scholar
Shennan, S. J. 1982a. The emergence of hierarchical structure, in (eds) Renfrew, C. Shennan, S. J., Ranking, resource and exchange (Cambridge), 9-11.Google Scholar
Shennan, S. J. 1982b. Ideology, change and the European Bronze Age, in (ed.) Hodder, I., Symbolic and structural archaeology (Cambridge), 155—161.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. G. 1981. Plough and pastoralism: aspects of the secondary products revolution, in (eds) Hodder, I., Isaac, G. & Hammond, N., Patterns of the past: studies in honour of David Clarke (London), 261-305.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. G. 1982. Mobile resources, settlement and exchange in early agricultural Europe, in (eds) Renfrew, C. and Shennan, S. J., Ranking, resource and exchange (Cambridge), 13-26.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. G. 1983. The secondary exploitation of animals in the Old World, World Archaeology, 15, 90—104.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. G. 1984. Social evolution: Europe in the later Neolithic and Copper Age, in (ed.) Bintliffe, J., Social evolution (Bradford).Google Scholar
Starling, N. J. 1983a. Studies in the neolithic settlement of Central Germany, (D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford).Google Scholar
Starling, N. J. 1983b. Neolithic settlement patterns in Central Germany, Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 2, 1—11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming, a. The neolithic Hohensiedlungen of Central Germany, in (ed.) Burgess, C., forthcoming.Google Scholar
Forthcoming, b. Colonization and succession: the earlier Neolithic of Central Europe, Proc. Prehist. Soc, LI.Google Scholar
Wetzel, G. 1979. Die Schbnfelder Kultur (Berlin).Google Scholar
Whittle, A. W. R. 1977. Earlier neolithic enclosures in north-west Europe, Proc. Prehist. Soc, XLIII, 329–348.Google Scholar
Wiślanśki, T. 1970. The Globular Amphora Culture, in (ed.) Wiślanśki, T., The Neolithic in Poland (Wroclaw-Warsaw-Kraków), 178—231.Google Scholar