Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:44:03.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sembiran: the beginnings of Indian contact with Bali

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

I. Wayan Ardika  and
Peter Bellwood
Peter Bellwood
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory & Anthropology, The Australian National University, GPO Box 4, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Classical times, the Indian continent was central to a trading network that ran west to the Mediterranean world revolving round Rome: despite its name, the Mediterranean was not the centre of the known world. Another world opened eastwards from India, and there are many obscure references to its eastern fringes, Now a series of finds from Bali, in the Indonesian archipelago, gives the elusive direct connection of Indian traders to that farther East.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 65 , Issue 247 , June 1991 , pp. 221 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ardika, I. WAYAN. 1987. Bronze artifacts and the rise of complex society in Bali. Unpublished MA thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Ardika, I. WAYAN. 1990. The beginnings of complex society in Bali, Indonesia. Paper presented at the Circum-Pacific Prehistory Conference, Seattle, August 1990.Google Scholar
Thaw, AUNG. 1968. Excavations at Beikthano. Rangoon: Ministry of Union Culture.Google Scholar
Aung-THWIN, M. 1987. Burma before Pagan, Asian Perspectives 25/2: 1–21.Google Scholar
Begley, V. 1967. Archaeological exploration in northern Ceylon, Expedition Summer 1967: 21–9.Google Scholar
Begley, V. 1983. Arikamedu reconsidered, American Journal of Archaeology 87: 461–81.Google Scholar
Begley, V. 1986. From Iron Age to Early Historical in the archaeology of South India, in Jacobson, J. (ed.), Essays in the archaeology of India and Pakistan: 297–319. New Delhi: American Institute of Indian Studies.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. 1976. Archaeological research in Minahasa and the Talaud Islands, Asian Perspectives 19/2: 240–88.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. 1985. Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago. Sydney: Academic.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. 1988. Archaeological research in South-Eastern Sabah. Kota Kinbalu: Sabah Museum and State Archives. Museum Monograph 2.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. & Omar, M. Trade patterns and political developments in Brunei and adjacent areas, AD 700-1500, Brunei Museum Journal 4/4: 155–79.Google Scholar
Bemmelen, R.W. Van. 1949. The geology of Indonesia. The Hague: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Brandes, J.L.A. 1889. De koperen platen van Sembiran (Buleleng, Bali), oorkonden in het Oud-Javaansch en het Oud-Balineesch, Tijdschrift voor Indisene Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde (Batavia) 33: 16–56.Google Scholar
Bronson, B. 1979. The late prehistory and early history of Central Thailand with special reference to Chansen, in Smith, & Watson, (ed.): 315–36.Google Scholar
Bronson, B. 1990. Glass and beads at Khuan Lukpad, Southern Thailand, in Glover, I. & Glover, E. (ed.). Southeast Asian Archaeology 1986: 213–29. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International series 561.Google Scholar
Casal, J.M. 1949. Fouilles de Virampatnam-Arikamedu. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Chhabra, B.CH. 1965. Expansion of Indo-Arvan culture during Fallava rule. Deihi: Munshi Ram Manohar Lai.Google Scholar
Coedes, G. 1928. The excavations at P’ong Tuk and their importance for the ancient history of Siam, Journal of the Siam Society 21/3: 195–209.Google Scholar
Coedes, G. 1975. The Indianized states of Southeast Asia. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Cortesao, A. (ed.). 1944. The Suma Oriental of Tome Pires. London: Hakluyt Society. Second series LXXXIX.Google Scholar
Dani, A.H. 1963. Indian palaeography. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Das GUPTA, C.C. 1958. The development of the Kharoshti script. Calcutta: Firma K.L. Mukhopadhyay.Google Scholar
De Casparis, J.G. 1979. Palaeography as an auxiliary discipline in research on early Southeast Asia, in Smith, & Watson, (ed.): 380–94.Google Scholar
Deraniyagala, S.U. 1972. The citadel of Anuradhapura 1969, Ancient Ceylon 2: 48–169.Google Scholar
Deraniyagala, S.U. 1986. Excavations in the Citadel of Anuradhapura: Gedige 1984, a preliminary report, Ancient Ceylon 6: 39–47.Google Scholar
Fox, R.B. 1970. The Tabon Caves. Manila: National Museum.Google Scholar
Ghosh, N.C. 1986. Excavations at Satanikota 1977–80. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.Google Scholar
Glover, I.C. 1990. Early trade between India and Southeast Asia. 2nd edition. Hull: University of Hull, Centre for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Gonda, J. 1973. Sanskrit in Indonesia. 2nd edition. New Delhi: International Academy of Indian Culture.Google Scholar
Goris, R. 1954. Prosasti Bali I & II. Bandung: Masa Baru.Google Scholar
Harrisson, T. 1964. Monochrome glass beads from Malaysia and elsewhere, Man (1964), Article 50.Google Scholar
Heekeren, H.R. Van. 1958. The Bronze-Iron Age of Indonesia. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Kempers, A.J.B. 1988. The kettledrums of Southeast Asia. Rotterdam: Balkema. Modern Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia 10.Google Scholar
Konow, S. 1929. Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum. vol.2, part I.Google Scholar
Lamb, A. 1965. Some observations on stone and glass beads in early Southeast Asia, Journal of the Malaysian Branch, Royal Asiatic Society 8/2: 87–124.Google Scholar
Levi, S. 1925. Ptolémée, le Niddesa et la Brhatkatha, Etudes Asiatiques 2:1–55. Paris: Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient.Google Scholar
Mabbett, I.W. 1977. The ‘Indianization’ of Southeast Asia, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 8:1–14, 143–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malleret, L. 1962. L’archéologie du delta du Mékong Ili: La culture du Fou-nan. Paris: Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient.Google Scholar
McConnell, J. 1986. Preliminary report on a newly found bronze drum from Bali, Indonesia, Indonesian Circle 40: 17–31.Google Scholar
McConnell, J. & Glover, I. 1990. A newly found bronze drum from Bali, Indonesia: some technical considerations, Modern Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia 11: 1–38.Google Scholar
Miller, J.I. 1969. The spice trade of the floman Empire. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, B.N. 1989. Decipherment of the Kharoshti-Brahmi script, Asiatic Society Monthly Bulletin 18/8: 1–10.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, B.N. 1989–90. Discovery of Kharoshti inscriptions in West Bengal, Quarterly Review of Historical Studies 29: 6–14.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, B.N. 1990a. A Kharoshti-Brahmi seal-matrix from Oc-Eo, Asiatic Society Monthly Bulletin 19/6: 1–4.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, B.N. 1990b. A sealing in the Lopburi Museum, Asiatic Society Monthly Bulletin 19/11: 1–2.Google Scholar
Ratna, INDRANINGSIH. 1985. Research on prehistoric beads in Indonesia, Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 6: 133–41.Google Scholar
Ray, H.P. 1989. Early maritime contacts between South and Southeast Asia, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 20/1: 42–54.Google Scholar
Santoso, SOEGONDO. 1985. The pottery from Gilimanuk, Bali, Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 6: 46–54.Google Scholar
Sarkar, H.B. 1981. A geographical introduction to Southeast Asia: the Indian perspective, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 137:293–323.Google Scholar
Sieveking, G. De G. 1962. The prehistoric cemetery at Bukit Tengku Lembu, Perlis, Federation Museums Journal 7: 25–54.Google Scholar
Smith, R.B. & Watson, W. (ed.), Early South East Asia. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soejono, R.P. 1977. Sistem-sistem penguburan pada akhir masa prasejarah di Bali. Disertasi, Universi-tas Indonesia, Jakarta.Google Scholar
Solheim, W.G. II. 1981. Notes on ‘Malay pottery’ in East Malaysia and neighbouring areas, Sarawak Museum Journal 29 (50 ns): 3–16.Google Scholar
Solheim, W.G. II & Deraniyagala, S. 1972. Archaeological survey to investigate Southeast Asian prehistoric presence in Ceylon, Ancient Ceylon Occasional Paper 1.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, S. 1964. Salihundam. Hyderabad: Government of Andhra Pradesh.Google Scholar
Walker, M.J.S. & Santoso, S. 1977a. Romano-Indian Rouletted pottery in Indonesia, Mankind 11:39–45.Google Scholar
Walker, M.J.S. & Santoso, S. 1977b. Romano-Indian rouletted pottery in Indonesia, Asian Perspectives 20: 228–35.Google Scholar
Wheatley, P. 1961. The Golden Khersonene. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.Google Scholar
Wheatley, P. 1975. Satyanrta in Swarnadvipa: from reciprocity to redistribution in Southeast Asia, in Sabloff, J.A. & Lamberg-Karlovsky, C.C. (ed.), Ancient civilization and trade: 227–83. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Wheatley, P. 1983. Nagara and Commandery. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago, Department of Geography. Research Papers 207–8.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M. 1948. Brahmagiri and Chandravalli 1947, Ancient India 4: 180–310.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M., Ghosh, A. & Deva, KRISHNA. 1946. Arikamedu: an Indo-Roman trading station on the east coast of India, Ancient India 2: 17–124.Google Scholar
Widia, I. Wayan. 1981. Temuan nekara perunggu desa Pacung, Tejakula, Saraswati 7. Denpasar. Museum Bali.Google Scholar
Wolters, O.W. 1967. Early Indonesian commerce. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar