Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:23:21.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rapid human response to Late Glacial climate change: a reply to Housley et al. (2000)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

S. P. E. Blockley ,
R. E. Donahue  and
A. M. Pollard
S. P. E. Blockley
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, England
R. E. Donahue
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, England
A. M. Pollard
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In their reply to our recent paper (Blockley et al.2000), Housley et ~ l(2.0 00) make four substantialpoints. Firstly, they assert that our critique oftheir two-stage re-colonization model rests solelyupon radiocarbon calibration. Secondly, and consequently,they point to problems with Late Glacialcalibration curves. Thirdly, they argue thatradiocarbon calibration should be advanced onlyfor sound archaeological reasons. Finally, theystate that our approach is environmentally deterministicand that we have demonstrated onlya weak correlation between human demographicchange and rapid climatic amelioration.Housley et al. (2000) argue against the use ofLate Glacial calibration curves, and in particularstate that 'it is because the calibration data are soheavily smoothed that Blockley et al. dispute ournotion of a northward movement of people'

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 74 , Issue 284 , June 2000 , pp. 427 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldhoose-Green, S. & Pttitt, P.. 1998. Paviland Cave: contextualizing the ‘Red Lady’, Antiquity 72: 756–72.Google Scholar
Alley, R.B., Meese, D.A. Shuman, C.A. Gow, A.J. Taylor, K.C. Grootes, P.M. White, J.W.C. Ram, M. Waddington, E.D. Mayewski, P.A. & Zielinski, G.A.. 1993. Abrupt increase in Greenland snow accumulation at the end of the Younger Dryas event, Natura 362: 527–9.Google Scholar
Blockley, S.P.E., Donahue, R.E. & Pollard, A.M.. 2000. Radiocarbon calibration and Late Glacial occupation in Northwest Europe, Antiquity 74: 112–19.Google Scholar
Housley, R.A., Gamble, C.S. & Pettitt, P.. 2000. Reply to Blockley, Donahue & Pollard, Antiquity 74: 119–21.Google Scholar
Housley, R.A., Gamble, C.S. Street, M. & Pettitt, P.. 1997. Radiocarbon evidence for the Lateglacial human recolomsation of northern Europe, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 63: 25–54.Google Scholar
Lowe, J.J., Coope, G.R. Sheldrick, C. Harkness, D.D. & Walker, M.J.C.. 1995. Direct comparison of UK temperatures and Greenland snow accumulation rates, 15,000 to 12,000 years ago, Journal of Quaternary Science 10: 175–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, M. & Terberger, T.. 1999. The last Pleniglacial and the human settlement of Central Europe: new information from the Rhineland site of Wiesbaden-Igstadt, Antiquity 73: 259–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuivkr, M., Long, A. Kra, R.S. & Devine, J.M. (ed.). 1993. Calibration 93, Radiocarbon 35.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., Reimer, P.J. Bard, E. Beck, J.W. Burr, G.S. Hughen, K.A. Kromer, B. McCormac, G. Van Der Plight, J. & Spurk, M.. 1998. 1NTCAL98 radiocarbon age calibration, 24,000–0 cal DP, Radiocarbon 40: 1041–83.Google Scholar
Wohlfarth, B. 1996. The chronology of the last termination: a review of radiocarbon dated, high-resolution terrestrial stratigraphies, Quaternary Science Reviews 15: 267–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Plight, J. 1999. Radiocarbon calibration for the Middle/Upper Paleolithic: a comment, Antiquity 73: 119–23.Google Scholar