Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:06:42.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The radiocarbon calendar recalibrated too soon?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and News
Information
Antiquity , Volume 47 , Issue 188 , December 1973 , pp. 309 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, R., (éd.). 1970. Scientific methods in medieval archaeology (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London).Google Scholar
Burleigh, R., 1973. The New Zealand radiocarbon conference, Antiquity, 47, 54–6.Google Scholar
Chatters, R.M., and Olson, E.A. (eds.). 1965. Proc. 6th Internati. Conf. on Radiocarbon and Tritium Dating, Pullman, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
Clark, R.M., and Renfrew, c.. 1973. Tree-ring calibration of radiocarbon dates and the chronology of ancient Egypt, Nature, 243, 266–70.Google Scholar
Damon, P.E., Long, A. and Wallick, E.I., 1972. Dendrochronology calibration of the carbon-14 time scale, in (eds.), Rafter and Grant-Taylor (1972)” 44–59.Google Scholar
Dyck, w. 1965. Secular variations in the C14 concentration of Douglas Fir tree rings, in (eds.), Chatters and Olson (1965), 440–51.Google Scholar
Farmer, j.G. and Baxter, M.s., 1972. Short-term trends in natural radiocarbon, in (eds.), Rafter and Grant-Taylor (1972), A58-A71.Google Scholar
Ferguson, c.w., 1968. Bristlecone pine: science and esthetics, Science, 159, 839–46.Google Scholar
1970. Dendrochronology of bristlecone pine, pinus aristata : establishment of a 7484-year chronology in the White Mountains of eastern-central California, USA, in (éd.), Ingrid U. Olsson, (1970), 246.Google Scholar
Jansen, H.s., 1970. Secular variation of radiocarbon in New Zealand and Australian trees, in (ed.), Olsson (1970), 261–74.Google Scholar
Lerman, J.C, Mookand, W.G. Vogel, J.C.. 197O. Cl4in tree rings from different localities, in (ed.), Olsson (1970), 275–301.Google Scholar
Mckerrell, H., 1972. Some aspects of the accuracy of carbon-14 dating, Scottish Forum for Archaeology 73–84.Google Scholar
Michael, H.N., and Ralph, E.K.. 1972. Discussion of radiocarbon dates obtained from precisely dated sequoia and bristlecone pine samples, in (eds.), Rafter and Grant-Taylor (1972), A11-A27.Google Scholar
Olsson, INGRID U. (ed.). 1970. Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology, Proc. 12th Nobel Symposium, Uppsala, 1969 (New York and Stockholm).Google Scholar
Ottaway, B. and Ottaway, J.H.. 1972. The Suess calibration curve and archaeological dating, Nature, 239, 512–3.Google Scholar
Rafter, T.A., and Grant-Taylor, T.L. (eds.). 1972. Proc. 8th Internati. Conf. on Radiocarbon Dating, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, 1972 (Royal Society of New Zealand), 1.Google Scholar
Ralph, E.K. and Michael, H.N.. 1969. University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates 12, Radiocarbon, II, 469–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(eds.), 1971. Dating techniques for the archaeologist (Cambridge, Mass. and London).Google Scholar
Ralph, E.K., Michael, H.N. and Han, M.C.. 1973. Radiocarbon dates and reality, MASCA Newsletter, August, XI, I. Google Scholar
Renfrew, c. 1970. The tree ring calibration of radiocarbon : an archaeological evaluation, PPS, 36, 280–311.Google Scholar
1973. Before civilization : the radiocarbon revolution and prehistoric Europe (London).Google Scholar
Renfrew, c., and Clark, R.M.. 1974. Problems of the radiocarbon calendar and its calibration, Archaeometry, 16(1), in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A.G., Baillie, M.G.L., Hillam, J., Pilcher, J.R., and Pearson, G.W.. 1972. Dendrochronological work in progress in Belfast: the prospects for an Irish post-glacial tree-ring sequence. A92 to A96.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., and Suess, H.E.. 1966. On the relationship between radiocarbon dates and true sample ages, Radiocarbon, 8, 534–40.Google Scholar
Suess, H.E., 1967. Bristlecone pine calibration of the radiocarbon time scale from 4100 BC to 1500 BC, in Radioactive dating and methods of low level counting, Proc. Monaco Symposium, 2–10 March 1967 (Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency), 143–51.Google Scholar
Switsur, U.R. 1973. The radiocarbon calendar recalibrated, Antiquity, 57, 131–7.Google Scholar
Vogel, J.C. 1969a. Remarks on the UC method, Helinium, 9, 19–26.Google Scholar
Vogel, J.C. 1969b. The radiocarbon time scale, S. Afr. Arch. Bull., 24, 83–7.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T 1971. Working with radiocarbon dates, PPS, 37, 15–33.Google Scholar
Wendland, W.M. and Donley, D.L.. 1971. Radiocarbon-calendar age relationship, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 11, 135–9.Google Scholar
Williams, R.G.B. 1973. Frost and the works of man, Antiquity, 47, 19–31.Google Scholar