Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:46:39.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prospects for Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Martin Rundkvist*
Affiliation:
*Department of History and Archaeology, University of Chester, Parkgate Road, Chester CH1 4BJ (scienceblogs.com/aardvarchaeology–email: [email protected])

Abstract

Swedish archaeology enters the new decade reeling, not so much from seasonal feasting as from lay-offs and excavation unit close-downs caused by the 2008-09 recession. Where to now? Where should we go? And, wishful thinking aside, where are we likely to end up?

Type
Debate
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brorsson, T. 2010. En ansvarsfull uppdragsarkeologi. Fornvännen 105: 53–4.Google Scholar
Ersgård, L. 2009. På konjunkturernas vågor. Några reflektioner kring 50 UV-år, in Ersgård, L. (ed.) UV 50 år: 195–9. Stockholm: National Heritage Board.Google Scholar
Petersson, H. & Ytterberg, N.. 2009. Att kvalitetssäkra den svenska uppdragsarkeologin. För en nationell centralisering av den vetenskapliga bedömningen. Fornvännen 104: 199204.Google Scholar
Rundkvist, M. 2008. För en liberalisering av de svenska metallsökarreglerna. Fornvännen 103: 118–22. Available on open access at fornvannen.se/pdf/2000talet/2008 118.pdf.Google Scholar
Svensson, H. & Söderberg, B.. 2009. Dumpad kunskap? Om metallsökning och uppdragsarkeologins villkor. Fornvännen 104: 131–6. Available on open access at fornvannen.se/pdf/2000talet/2009 131.pdf.Google Scholar