Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:25:18.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prehistoric, prehistory, prehistorian … who invented the terms?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Norman Clermont  and
Philip E.L. Smith
Philip E.L. Smith
Affiliation:
Départment d'Anthropologie, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, Succ. A. Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Who first used a word for the idea of ‘prehistory’? Chippindale, in a paper published last year, tried to clear up this old confusion once and for all. He failed. Here are more answers to the question — a matter of real historical importance since the invention of a prehistoric past was so central to the 19th-century development of archaeology.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 64 , Issue 242 , March 1990 , pp. 97 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous, [Cartailhac, E.?] 1872. Les travaux prè-historiques en Espagne [translation of manuscript of L.M. Tubino], Matèriaux VII: 45–54.Google Scholar
Chambers, C.H. 1865. Lake habitations and prehistoric remains in Italy by Gastaldi. London: Anthropological Society of London. [Translation of Gastaidi, B., Nuovi cenni sugli oggeiti di aita antichitàtrovati nelle torbiere e nelle marniere, Turin, 1862]. (Reviewed in Matèriaux II, 1866: 62–3.)Google Scholar
Chippindale, C. 1988. The invention of words for the idea of ‘prehistory', Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 54: 304–14.Google Scholar
OCCCHI, I. 1865. Di alcuni resti umani e degli oggetti di umana industria dei tempi preistorici raccolti in Toscana. Milan: Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali, I. (Reviewed in Matèriaux II, 1866: 135–91).Google Scholar
Daniel, G. 1962. The idea of prehistory. London: C.A. Watts.Google Scholar
Desor, E. 1866. Poterie des temps paléoethnologiques, Matériaux II: 491–3.Google Scholar
D'Eichthal, G. 1845. Etude sur l'histoire primitive des races océaniennes et américaines, Mémoires de la Société Ethnologique II, première partie: 151–320. Paris: Librairie Orientale de Mme Vve Dondey-Dupre.Google Scholar
Garrigou, F. & Filhol, H.. 1865. Sur les cavernes de l'âge de la pierre suisse, dans la vallée de Tarascon (Ariège), Matériaux II: 280–82.Google Scholar
Gassies, -. 1866. Antéhistorique du Lot-et-Garonne et de la Gironde. Lettre du 21 octobre 1865, Matériaux II: 92–6.Google Scholar
Kohl, J. G. 1985. Kitchi-Gami. Life among the Lake Superior Ojibway. St. Paul (MN): Historical Society Press. [Reprint of the 1860 translation by Wraxall, L. of the 1859 German edition.]Google Scholar
Lartet, E. 1864. Lettre à Milne-Edwards. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris 58: 401–8.Google Scholar
Lartet, E. 1865. Rapport adressé à M. le Ministre de 1'Instruction publique sur un envoi de fossiles et d'objets d'archéologie primitive, Matériaux I: 456–60. [Originally published in Bulletin administratif du Ministère de l'Instruction publique, no. 64, 26 avril 1865: 518-22].Google Scholar
Lartet, E. & Christy, H.. 1864. Cavernes du Périgord. Objets gravés et scuíptés des temps pré-historiques dans i'Europe occidentale. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J. 1865. Pre-historic times, as illustrated by ancient remains and the manners and customs of modern savages. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Lyell, C. 1863. The geological evidences of the antiquity of man. 2nd edition. London: John Murrary.Google Scholar
Marion, H. 1885-1902. Eichthal (Gustave d’), La Grande Encyclopédie 15: 709–10.Google Scholar
Morlot, A. 1861. General views on archaeology, Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution for the Year 1860: 305–17. Washington.Google Scholar
Morlot, A. 1863. An introductory lecture to the study of high antiquity, Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution /or the Year 1862: 303–17. Washington.Google Scholar
Mortillet, G. de. 1865. Chronique, Matériaux I: 493–8.Google Scholar
Mortillet, G. de. 1867. Promenades préhistoriques à l'exposition universelle, Matériaux III: 181-368.Google Scholar
Mortillet, G. de. 1875. Tableau archéologique de la Gaule. Exposition Internationale de Géographie, 15 juillet 1875. Paris: Ernest Leroux.Google Scholar
Prestwich, J. 1860. On the occurrence of flint implements, associated with the remains of animals of extinct species in beds of a late geological period, in France at Amiens and Abbeville, and in England at Hoxne. [Read 26 May 1859], Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 150: 277–317.Google Scholar
Spring, A. 1865. Sur les divers modes de formation des dépôts ossifères dans les cavernes, Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 5e série, Zoologie et Paléontologie 4: 303–73.Google Scholar
Vogt, C. 1865. Leçons sur l'homme: sa place dans la creation et dans l'histoire de la terre. Paris: Reinwald.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1851. The archaeology and prehistoric annals of Scotland. Edinburgh: Sutherland & Knox.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1862. Prehistoric man: researches into the origin of civilisation in the Old and the New World. Cambridge: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1863. Prehistoric annals of Scotland. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar