Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:50:04.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phylogeny vs reticulation in prehistory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Peter Bellwood
Peter Bellwood*
Affiliation:
Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two pure and opposing models exist to give historical account of the structure in modern cultural patterns. A phylogenetic account explores divergence from some shared commonality (the word ‘phylogenetic’ is from the Greek words for ‘tribal origins’). A reticulate account concentrates on a network of interactions (the word ‘reticulate’ comes via French from the Latin for ‘small net’). It follows that neither model may tell all the story. These continuing issues are explored with particular attention to the relations between histories as they are inferred from archaeological and from linguistic patterns.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 70 , Issue 270 , December 1996 , pp. 881 - 890
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ammerman, A. & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L.. 1984. The Neolithic transition and the genetics of population in Europe. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R. R. 1989. The evolution of ethnicity among the Acholi of Uganda: the precolonial phase, Ethnohistory 36:19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakbujani, G., Sokal, R. R. & Oden, N. L.. 1995. Indo-European origins: a computer-simulation test of five hypotheses, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 96: 109–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, R., Goddakd, I., O'Grady, R., Funk, V. A., Mooi, R., Kress, W. J. & Cannell, P.. 1990. Speaking of forked tongues: the feasibility of reconciling human phylogeny and the history of language, Current Anthropology 31: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellwood, P. 1984-5. A hypothesis for Austronesian origins, Asian Perspectives 26: 107–17.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. 1987. The Polynesians. 2nd edition. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. 1990. Foraging towards farming: a decisive transition or a millennial blur?, Review of Archaeology 11(2): 14–24.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. 1991. The Austronesian dispersal and the origin of languages, Scientific American 265(1):88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellwood, P. 1994. An archaeologist's view of language macrofamily relationships, Oceanic Linguistics 33: 391–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellwood, P. 1995a. Early agriculture, language history and the archaeological record in China and Southeast Asia, in Young, C.-T. and Li, B.W.-L. (ed.), Archaeology in Southeast Asia: 1122. Hong Kong: University Museum & Art Gallery.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. 1995b. Language families and human dispersal, Cambridge Archaeological Journal 5: 271–4.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. 1996a. Early agriculture and the dispersal of the Southern Mongoloids, in Akazawa, T. & Szathmary, E. (ed.), Prehistoric Mongoloid dispersals: 287–302. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. 1996b. The origins and spread of agriculture in the Indo-Pacific region, in Harris, D. (ed.), The origins and spread of agriculture and pastoralism in Eurasia: 465-98. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. In press a. Prehistoric cultural explanations for the existence of widespread language families, in McConvell, P. & Evans, N. (ed.). Understanding ancient Australia: perspectives from archaeology and linguistics. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P. In press b. Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian archipelago. 2nd edition. Honolulu (HI): University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Bellwood, P., Fox, J.J. & Tryon, D. (ed.). 1995. The Austronesians: historical and comparative perspectives. Canberra: Department of Anthropology, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Blust, R. 1984-5. The Austronesian homeland: a linguistic perspective, Asian Perspectives 26(1):45–68.Google Scholar
Björk, C. & Anderson, L.. 1987. Linneo in Monet's garden. Stockholm: R&S.Google Scholar
Brosnaiian, L. F. 1969. Some historical cases of language imposition, in Spencer, J. (ed.), Language in Africa: 7–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. 1983. The transition to agriculture and some of its consequences, in Ortner, D. J. (ed.), How humans adapt: 103-26. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Piazza, A., Menozzi, P. & Mountain, J.. 1988. Reconstruction of human evolution: bringing together genetic, archaeological and linguistic data, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 85: 6002–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavalli-Sforza, L. I., Menozzi, P. & Piazza, A.. 1993. Demie expansions and human evolution, Science 259: 639–46.Google Scholar
(Ed.). 1994. The history and geography of human genes. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, J., Sokal, R. & Rutilen, M.. 1995. Worldwide analysis of genetic and linguistic relationships of human populations, Human Biology 67: 595–612.Google ScholarPubMed
Crosby, A. 1986. Ecological imperialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dewar, R. 1995. Of nets and trees: untangling the reticulate and dendritic in Madagascar's prehistory, World Archaeology 26: 301–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, T. 1995. Language contact and change in Melanesia, in Bellwood, P. et al. 1995: 192–213.Google Scholar
Dyen, I. 1990. Homomeric lexical classification, in Baldi, P. (ed.), Linguistic change and reconstruction methodology: 211-30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyen, I., Kruskal, J. B. & Black, P.. 1992. An Indoeuropean classification: a iexicostatistical experiment. Philadelphia (PA): American Philosophical Society. Transactions 82(5).Google Scholar
Ehret, C. 1988. Language change and the material correlates of language and ethnic shift, Antiquity 62: 564–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. A. 1969. A comparison of formative cultures in the Americas. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution. Contribution to Anthropology 11.Google Scholar
Frieu, M. 1975. The notion of tribe. Menlo Park (CA): Cummings.Google Scholar
Gebauer, A. B. & Price, T. D.. 1992. Foragers to farmers: an introduction, in Gebauer, A. B. & Price, T. D. (ed.), Transitions to agriculture in prehistory: 1–10. Madison (WI): Prehistory Press.Google Scholar
Gosden, C. & Pavlides, C.. 1994. Are islands insular? Landscape vs seascape in the case of the Arawe Islands, Papua New Guinea, Archaeology in Oceania 29:162–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. & Harris, D.. 1979. Historical linguistics and archaeology, in Ortiz, A. (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians 9: Southwest: 170-77. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Hall, M. 1990. Farmers, kings and traders. Chicago (TL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. & Laprade, R.. 1982. Castilian colonization and indigenous languages: the cases of Quechua and Aymara, in Cooper, R. L. (ed.), Language spread: 118-47. Blooming-ton (IN): Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hlernaux, J. 1964. The concept of race and the taxonomy of mankind, in Montagu, A. (ed.), The concept of race: 29–45. New York (NY): Free Press.Google Scholar
Hicham, C. 1996. Archaeology and linguistics in Southeast Asia: implications of the Austrie hypothesis. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 14: 110–18.Google Scholar
Holt, P. M., Lambton, A.K.S. & Lewis, B. (ed.). 1977. The Cambridge history of Islam. IA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoopes, J. W. 1994. Ford revisited, Journal of World Prehistory 8: 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, T. 1990. Language history in South America, in Payne, D. L. (ed.), Amazonian linguistics: 13–73. Austin (TX): University of Texas Press. Google Scholar
Kirch, P. V. & Green, R. C.. 1987. History, phytogeny and evolution in Polynesia, Current Anthropology 28: 431–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, R. & Pacel, M.. 1994. The comparative method in anthropology, Current Anthropology 35: 549–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C. & Romney, A. K.. 1994. Material culture, geographic propinquity, and linguistic affiliation on the north coast of New Guinea: areanalysis of Welsch, Terrell & Nadolski (1992), American Anthropologist 96: 370–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J.H. 1994a. Putting anthropology back together again: the ethnogenotic critique of cladistic theory, American Anthropologist 96: 925–48.Google Scholar
Moore, J.H. 1994b. Ethnogenetic theory, National Geographic Research and Exploration 10(1):10–23.Google Scholar
Moore, J.H. 1995. The end of a paradigm, Current Anthropology 36:530-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M. & Chouuhury, A. K.. 1993. Evolutionary relations of human populations on a world scale, Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 927–43.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. K. & Ross, M.. 1995. The prehistory of the Oceanic languages: a current view, in Bellwood et al (ed.): 39–74.Google Scholar
Pluciennik, M. 1996. Genetics, archaeology and the wider world, Antiquity 70: 13–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1987. Archaeology and language. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1992a. Archaeology, genetics and linguistic diversity, Man (n.s.) 27:445–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1992b. World languages and human dispersals: a minimalist view, in Hall, J. A. & Jarvie, I. C. (ed.), Transition to modernity: 11–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1994. World linguistic diversity. Scientific American 268(7):104–10.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. M., Moore, C. C. & Romney, A. K.. 1995. Predicting similarity in material culture among New Guinea villages from propinquity and language. Current Anthropology 36: 769–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. 1989. Early Oceanic linguistic prehistory, Journal of Pacific History 24: 135–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. 1991. Redefining Guy's sociolinguistic types of language change, Diachronica 8: 119–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, M. 1994. Childe and the archaeology of freedom, in Harris, D. (ed.), The archaeology of V. Gordon Childe: 35–54. London: UGL Press.Google Scholar
Ruhlen, M. 1987. A guide to the world's languages. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Linares, A., Minch, E., Meyer, D. & Cavalu-Sforza., L. L. 1995. Analysis of classical DNA markers for reconstructing human population history, in Brenner, S. & Hanihara, K. (ed.), he origin and past of modern humans as viewed from DMA: 123-48. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Schooling, S. 1990. Language maintenance in New Caledonia. Dallas (TX): Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Terrell, F. 1986. Prehistory in the Pacific Islands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Terrell, F. 1988. History as a family tree, history as an entangled bank, Antiquity 62: 642–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrell, J., Gosden, G. & Hunt, T.. In press. The dimensions of social life in the Pacific, Current Anthropology 38(2).Google Scholar
Thomason, S. & Kaufman, T.. 1988. Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillotson, D. 1994. Who invented the Dayaks? Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. 1939. Gedanken über das Indogermanen-problem, Acta Linguistica (Hafnicnsia) 1: 81–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upham, S. 1994. Nomads of the Desert West: a shifting continuum in prehistory, Journal of World Prehistory 8:113-68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardhauch, R. 1987. Languages in competition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Welsch, R. L., Terrell, J. & Nadolski, J. A.. 1992. Language and culture on the North Coast of New Guinea, American Anthropologist 94:568–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsch, R. & Terrell, J.. 1994. Reply to Moore & Romney, American Anthropologist 96: 392–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurm, S. A. 1991. Language death and disappearance, in Robins, R. H. & Uhlenbeck, E. M. (ed.), Endangered languages: 1–12. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Yoffee, N. 1990. Before Babel, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 56: 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, R. N. 1994. Accounting for the prehistoric long-distance movement of goods with a measure of style, World Archaeology 26:208-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar