Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T17:20:46.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The phonetic decipherment of Mayan glyphs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Stephen D. Houston
Stephen D. Houston*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The complete decipherment of Mayan glyphs is an event that neither we, nor perhaps our children, shall ever see: the script is tortuously complicated, as many hieroglyphic writing systems are, and hardly susceptible to rapid and unequivocal ‘codebreaking’. Nevertheless, good progress has been made towards reading the glyphs, with many solid achievements in reconstructing the genealogies and political interaction of royal dynasties of the Classic period (e.g. Berlin 1959; Proskouriakoff 1960). The focus of the present paper is another, more controversial feature of Mayan glyphs: a set of ‘phonetic’ or syllabic units used in spelling Mayan words. Virtually all glyph specialists now accept the validity of these units, but the path to consensus has been difficult and acrimonious. We shall examine here why many good scholars resisted ‘phoneticism’ in Mayan script, and why additional evidence so impressively confirms its existence.

Type
Special section: the archaeology of Maya decipherment
Information
Antiquity , Volume 62 , Issue 234 , March 1988 , pp. 126 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brasseur de Bourbourg, C. 1869. Lettre à M. Léon de Rosny. Paris: Amyot.Google Scholar
Berlin, H. 1959. Glifos nominales en el sarcófago de Palenque, Humanidades 2(10): 1–8.Google Scholar
Bricker, V. 1986. A grammar of Mayan hieroglyphs. New Orleans: Middle American Research Institute, Tulane University. Publication 56.Google Scholar
Brinton, D. 1895. A primer of Mayan hieroglyphics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Series in Philology, Literature and Archaeology 3(2).Google Scholar
Chadwick, J. 1987. Linear Band related scripts. London: British Museum Publications.Google Scholar
Durbin, M. 1969. An interpretation of Bishop Diego de Landa’s Maya alphabet, in Philological and Documentary Studies, Volume II: 169–79. New Orleans: Middle American Research Institute, Tulane University. Publication 12.Google Scholar
Fox, J. & Justeson, J.. 1984. Polyvalence in Mayan hieroglyphic writing, in Justeson, & Campbell, 1984: 17–76.Google Scholar
Houston, S. 1983. A reading for the flint-shield glyph, in Houston, S.D. (ed.), Contributions to Maya hieroglyphic decipherment: 13–25. New Haven: HRA Flex Books.Google Scholar
Houston, S. 1984. An example of homophony in Maya script, American Antiquity 49(4): 790–808.Google Scholar
Justeson, J. 1984. Appendix B: interpretations of Mayan hieroglyphs, in Justeson, & Campbell, 1984: 315–362.Google Scholar
Justeson, J. 1986. The origin of writing systems: Preclassic Mesoamerica, World Archaeology 17(3): 437–58.Google Scholar
Justeson, J. & Campbell, L. (ed.). 1984. Phoneticism in Mayan hieroglyphic writing. Albany: Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, State Univeristy of New York at Albany. Publication 9.Google Scholar
Kelley, D. 1962. A history of the decipherment of Maya script, Anthropological Linguistics 4: 1–48.Google Scholar
Kelley, D. 1968. Kakupacal and the Itzas, Estudios de Cultura Maya 7: 255–68.Google Scholar
Kelley, D. 1976. Deciphering the Maya script. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Knorosov, Y. 1958. The problem of the study of the Maya hieroglyphic writing, American Antiquity 23: 284–91.Google Scholar
Knorosov, Y. 1963. Pis’mennost’indeitsev maiia. Moscow & Leningrad: Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Knorosov, Y. 1965. Principios para descifrar los escritos mayas, Estudios de Cultura Maya 5: 153–88.Google Scholar
Knorosov, Y. 1967. The writing of the Maya Indians. Cambridge (MA): Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University. Russian Translation Series 4.Google Scholar
Knorosov, Y. 1982. Maya hieroglyphic codices. Albany: Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, State University of New York at Albany. Publication 8.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, F. 1973. On the derivation and reading of the ‘ben-ich’ prefix, in Benson, E.P. (ed.), Mesoamerican writing systems: 99–143. Washington (D.C.): Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, F. 1984. Glyphic substitutions: Homophonic and synonymic, in Justeson, J.S. & Campbell, L. 1984: 167–84.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, F.G. & Coe, M.D.. 1968. Linguistic and ethnographic data pertinent to the ‘cage’ glyph of Dresden 36c, Estudios de Cultura Maya 7: 269–84.Google Scholar
Love, B. 1987. Glyph T93 and Maya ‘hand-scattering’ events, Research reports on ancient Maya writing 5. Washington (D.C.): Center for Maya Research.Google Scholar
Mathews, P. 1984. Appendix A: a Maya hieroglyphic syllabary, in Justeson, & Campbell, 1984: 311–14.Google Scholar
Mathews, P. & Justeson, J.. 1984. Patterns of sign substitution in Maya hieroglyphic writing: ‘The affix cluster’, in Justeson, & Campbell, 1984: 185–231.Google Scholar
Mathews, P. & Willey, G.R.. 1986. Prehistoric polities of the Pasion Region: hieroglyphic texts and their archaeological settings. Paper prepared for the School of American Research Advanced Seminar ‘Elite interaction in Classic Maya civilization’. Santa Fe: School of American Research.Google Scholar
Morley, S., Brainerd, G. & Sharer, R.. 1983. The ancient Maya. 4th edition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, D. 1977. Maya architecture of the central Yucatan peninsula, Mexico. New Orleans: Middle American Research Institute. Publication 44.Google Scholar
Proskouriakoff, T. 1960. Historical implications of a pattern of dates at Piedras Negras, Guatemala, American Antiquity 25: 454–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, M.G. 1983. The sculptures of Palenque I: the Temple of the Inscriptions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosny, L. de 1876. Essai sur le déchiffrement de l’écriture hiératique de l’Amérique Centrale. Paris: Maison neuve.Google Scholar
Schele, L. 1982. Maya Glyphs: the verbs. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Schele, L. & Miller, M.. 1986. The blood of kings: dynasty and ritual in Maya art. Fort Worth: Kimbell Art Museum.Google Scholar
Seler, E. 1893. Is the Maya hieroglyphic writing phonetic?, Science 21: 6–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seler, E. 1902–23. Gesammelte Abhandiungen zur amerikanischen Sprach- und Alterthumskunde. Berlin: A. Ascher.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1892. Key to the Maya hieroglyphs, Science 20: 44–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C. 1893. Are the Maya hieroglyphs phonetic?, American Anthropologist 6: 241–70.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1904. Central American hieroglyphic writing, Smithsonian Institution Annual Report for 1903: 705–21. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. 1953. Review of Y.V. Knorosov ‘La antigua escritura de los pueblos de America Central’, Yan 2: 174–8.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. 1959. Systems of hieroglyphic writing in Middle America and methods of deciphering them, American Antiquity 23: 297–308.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. 1962. A catalog of Maya hieroglyphs. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. 1963a. Algunas consideraciones respecto al desciframiento de los jeroglíficos mayas, Estudios de Cultura Maya 3: 119–48.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. 1963b. Pictorial synonyms and homonyms in the Maya Dresden codex, Tlalocan 4: 148–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. 1971. Maya hieroglyphic writing: an Introduction. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. 1972a. Maya hieroglyphs without tears. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. 1972b. A commentary on the Dresden codex. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society. Memoir 93.Google Scholar
Tozzer, A. 1941. Landa’s Relación de las cosas de Yucatan. Cambridge (MA): Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University. Paper 18.Google Scholar
Valentini, P. 1880. The Landa alphabet: a Spanish fabrication, Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society 75: 59–91.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. 1933. The phonetic value of certain characters in Maya writing. Cambridge (MA): Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University. Paper 13 (2).Google Scholar
Whorf, B. 1942. Decipherment of the linguistic portion of the Maya hieroglyphs, Smithsonian Institution Report for 1941: 479–502.Google Scholar