Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:32:37.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Palaeogeography around the Harappan port of Lothal, Gujarat, western India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

K.P.N. Kumaran
Affiliation:
Geology and Palaeontology Group, Agharkar Research Institute, G.G. Agarkar Road, Pune 411 004, India (Email: [email protected])

Abstract

The authors report a reconstruction of the palaeogeography around the Harappan town of Lothal, major port of the Indus civilisation, using multispectral satellite imagery and environmental analysis. Key results include the identification of a broad tidally influenced palaeochannel adjoining the western part of Lothal and a former estuary towards the east. Micropalaeontological analyses show that Lothal developed over a tidal salt marsh and was subsequently left high and dry as the sea level dropped.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bolli, H.M., Sanders, J.B. & Perch-Nielsen, K. 1985. Plankton stratigraphy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boltovsky, E., Scott, D.B. & Medioli, F.S.. 1991. Morphological variations of benthic foraminiferal tests in response to changes in ecological parameters: a review. Journal of Palaeontology 65: 175185.Google Scholar
Jensen, J.R. 2000. Remote sensing of the environment: an earth resource perspective. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Koss, J.E., Ethridge, F.G. & Schumm, S.A.. 1994. An experimental study of the effects of base-level change on fluvial, coastal plain and shelf systems. Journal of Sedimentary Research B64: 9098.Google Scholar
Rao, S.R. 1985. Lothal. Archaeological Survey of India.Google Scholar
Schumm, S.A. 1993. River response to baselevel change: implications for sequence stratigraphy. Journal of Geology 101: 279294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar