Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T02:32:30.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes and News

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and News
Information
Antiquity , Volume 4 , Issue 15 , September 1930 , pp. 352 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Its dimensions were :-length (internal), 33 paces; breadth (internal), 12 paces; width of ditch, 3 to 4 paces. There was a gap visible in the ditch at the east end.

2 Printed in The Cartulary of Eynsham (ed.Salter, H.E. 1, 23.Google Scholar

3 Published in facsimile.

4 Archaeologia 71, 227–65, based upon the Percy Manning MSS.Google Scholar See also my Long Barrows of the Cotswolds (Bellows, John Gloucester, 1925,) p.214.Google Scholar

5 Geographical Journal, 1912, p.186.Google ScholarPubMed See also American Geographical Review, 1922, 7, 257–63.Google Scholar

* If that is to happen—and it should not be allowed—what is the good of making the by-pass at all? —EDITOR.