Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:24:05.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new dating sequence for Çatalhöyük

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Craig Cessford
Craig Cessford*
Affiliation:
Çatalhöyük Research Project, Department of Archaeology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, England. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A recent series of accelerator mass spectrometry dates from the earliest excavated deposits at Çatalhöyük has allowed the origins of the site to be more precisely dated. These dates also provide a reliable basis for the construction of an overall intra-site chronological sequence.

Keywords

ÇatalhöyükNeolithicdating
Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 75 , Issue 290 , December 2001 , pp. 717 - 725
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, A.J. 1990. Science-based dating in archaeology. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bordaz, f. 1973. Current research in the Neolithic of South central Turkey: Suberde, Erbaba and the chronological implications, American Journal of Archaeology 77: 282–8.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. 1999. Excavations in the KOPAL Area, http://catal.arch.cam.ac.uk/catal/Archive_rep99/boyer99.html Google Scholar
Bronk-Ramsey, C. 2000. OxCal 3.5, http://info.ox.ac.uk/departments/rlaha/orau.index.htm Google Scholar
Buck, C.E., Christen, J.A. & James, G.N.. 1999. BCal: an on-line Bayesian radiocarbon calibration tool, Internet Archaeology 7, http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue7/buck_toc.html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esin, U. & Hakmanakaya, S.. 1999. Aşikli in the frame of central Anatolian Neolithic, in Özdogan & Basgelen 1999: 115–32.Google Scholar
Farid, S. 1999. Archive summary for the South Area, http://catal.arch.cam.ac.uk/catal/Archive_rep99/farid99.html Google Scholar
Göktürk, E.H., Hillegonds, D.J., Lipschutz, M.E. & Hodder, I.. Forthcoming. Accelerator mass spectrometry dating at Çatalhöyük.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed) 1996. On the surface Çatalhöyük 1993–95. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara. Monograph 22.Google Scholar
Matthews, W. & Farid, S.. (1996). Exploring the 1960s surface — the stratigraphy of Çatalhöyük, in Hodder 1996: 271–300.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1962. Excavations at Çatal Hüyük, first preliminary report, 1961, Anatolian Studies 12: 41–65.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1963. Excavations at Çatal Hüyük, second preliminary report, 1962, Anatolian Studies 13: 43–103.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1964. Excavations at Çatal Hüyük, third preliminary report, 1963, Anatolian Studies 14: 39–119.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1966. Excavations at Çatal Hüyük, fourth preliminary report, 1965, Anatolian Studies 16: 15–191.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1967. Çatal Hüyük: A Neolithic town in Anatolia. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1998. Çatal Hüyük: the 1960s seasons, in Matthews, R., Ancient Anatolia. Fifty years’ work by the British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara: 35–41. Ankara: BIAA.Google Scholar
Newton, M.W. & Kuniholm, P.I.. 1999. Wiggles worth watching — making radiocarbon work. The case of Çatal Höyük, in Betancourt, P.P., Karageorghis, V., Laffineur, R. & Niemeier, W.-D., Meletemata. Studies in Aegean urchueology presented to Malcolm H. Weiner as he enters his 65th year: 527–37. Liège: Université de Liège. Aegaeum 20.Google Scholar
Özbaşaran, M. 1999. Musular: A general assessment on a new Neolithic site in central Anatolia, in Özdogan & Basgelen 1999: 147–55.Google Scholar
Özbasaran, M. 2000. The neolithic site of Musular — Central Anatolia, Anatolica 26: 129–51.Google Scholar
ÖZdogan, M. & Basgelen, N.. 1998. Neolithic in Turkey: the cradle of civilization. Ankara: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayinlari.Google Scholar
Roberts, N., Boyer, P. & Parish, R.. 1996. Preliminary results of geoarchaeological investigations at Çatalhöyük, in Hodder 1996: 19–39.Google Scholar
Stuckreth, R. & Lawn, B.. 1969. University of Pennsylvania Radiocarbon Dates XI, Radiocarbon 11: 1150–62.Google Scholar
Stuckreth, R. & Ralph, E.K.. 1965. University of Pennsylvania Radiocarbon Dates VIII, Radiocarbon 7: 187–99.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., Reimer, P.J., Bard, E., Beck, J.W., Burr, G.S., Hughen, K.A., Kromer, B., McCormac, G., Plight, J. van der & Spurk, M.. 1998. INTCAL98 Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 24000–0 cal B.P, Radiocarbon 40.3: 1041–83.Google Scholar
Yakar, J. 1991. Prehistoric Anatolia. The Neolithic transformation and the Early Chalcolithic Period. Tel Aviv: University of Tel Aviv, Institute of Archaeology. Monograph 9.Google Scholar
Yakar, J. 1994. Prehistoric Anatolia: the Neolithic transformation and the early Chalcolithic period. Supplement 1. Tel Aviv: University of Tel Aviv, Institute of Archaeology. Monograph 9a.Google Scholar