Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T15:49:12.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making posthumanist kin in the past

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2021

Rachel J. Crellin
Rachel J. Crellin*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, University of Leicester, UK (✉ [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 95 , Issue 379 , February 2021 , pp. 238 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brück, J. 2021. Ancient DNA, kinship and relational identities in Bronze Age Britain. Antiquity 95: 228–37. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2020.216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crellin, R.J. & Harris, O.J.T.. 2020. Beyond binaries: interrogating ancient DNA. Archaeological Dialogues 27: 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203820000082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaan, L. & Nijland, S.. 2002. King & king. Berkeley (CA): Tricycle.Google Scholar
Dehaan, L. & Nijland, S.. 2004. King & king & family. Berkeley (CA): Tricycle.Google Scholar
Ferrando, F. 2019. Posthumanist philosophy. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D.J. 2008. When species meet. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, D.J. 2016. Staying with the trouble: making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knipper, C. et al. 2017. Female exogamy and gene pool diversification at the transition from the Final Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age in Central Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 114: 10083–88. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706355114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mittnik, A. et al. 2019. Kinship-based social inequality in Bronze Age Europe. Science 366: 731–34. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax6219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, C. & Jones, R. (ed.). 2016. The development of Neolithic house societies in Orkney. Havertown (PA): Windgather. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv13gvg8mCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, D.W. & Peel, E.. 2016. Critical kinship studies: an introduction to the field. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50505-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjögren, K.-G. et al. 2020. Kinship and social organization in Copper Age Europe: a cross-disciplinary analysis of archaeology, DNA, isotopes, and anthropology from two Bell Beaker cemeteries. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/863944Google ScholarPubMed
Tallbear, K. 2017. Beyond the life/not life binary: a feminist indigenous reading of cryopreservation, interspecies thinking and the new materialisms, in Radin, J. & Kowal, E. (ed.) Cryopolitics: 179–202. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tallbear, K. 2018. Making love and relations beyond settler sexuality, in Haraway, D. & Clark, A. (ed.) Make kin, not babies: 145–64. Chicago (IL): Prickly Paradigm.Google Scholar
Tallbear, K. 2019. Caretaking relations, not American dreaming. Journal of Comparative and Relational Ethnic Studies 6: 24–41.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 2013. The birth of Neolithic Britain: an interpretive account. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199681969.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, V. 2013. Indigenous place-thought and agency amongst humans and non-humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education and Society 2: 20–34.Google Scholar