Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T17:16:50.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The making and meaning of a Mississippian axe-head cache

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

Timothy R. Pauketat  and
Susan M. Alt
Timothy R. Pauketat
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Department of Anthropology, 109 Davenport Hall, MC-148, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
Susan M. Alt
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Department of Anthropology, 109 Davenport Hall, MC-148, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recent discovery of a cache of 70 groundstone axe-heads at the Grossmann site, near Cahokia, in the Mississippi valley prompts a new interpretation of the commemorative and ritual value of such deposits. The makers of these axe-heads seem to belong to a community of specialists who had a contributory role in the foundation of the Cahokia polity.

Keywords

MississipianCahokiaaxe-heads
Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 78 , Issue 302 , December 2004 , pp. 779 - 797
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldenderfer, M. S. & Blashfield, R. K.. 1984. Cluster Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, S. M. 1999. Spindle whorls and fiber production at early Cahokian settlements. Southeastern Archaeology 18:124–133.Google Scholar
Alt, S. M. 2001. Cahokian change and the authority of tradition, in Pauketat, T. R. (ed.), The Archaeology of Traditions: Agency and History Before and After Columbus: 141–156. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Alt, S. M. 2002. The Knoebel Site: Tradition and Change in the Cahokian Suburbs. Unpublished Masters thesis, Department of Anthropology. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Alt, S. M. 2003. More than mounds: Mississippian ritual in the Cahokian uplands. Paper presented at the 68th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, April 9–13, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Amos, D. H. & Desborough, G. A.. 1970. Mafic Intrusive Rocks of Precambrian Age in Southeast Missouri. Report of Investigations Number 47. Rolla: Missouri Geological Survey and Water Resources.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 2000. An Archaeology of Natural Places. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brouk, M. 1978. A Middle Mississippian crematory burial. Central States Archaeological Journal 25:122–128.Google Scholar
Brown, J. A. 1996. The Spiro Ceremonial Center: The Archaeology of Arkansas Valley Caddoan Culture in Eastern Oklahoma. Museum of Anthropology, Memoirs Number 29. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
CSAJ. 1979. Untitled photo. Central States Archaeological Journal 26:160.Google Scholar
CSAJ. 1995. Untitled photo. Central States Archaeological Journal 42:66.Google Scholar
Cobb, C. R. 2000. From Quarry to Cornfield: The Political Economy of Mississippian Hoe Production. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Connerton, P. 1989. How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobres, M.-A. 2000. Technology and Social Agency. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Emerson, T. E. 1997a. Cahokia and the Archaeology of Power. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, T. E. 1997b. Cahokian elite ideology and the Mississippian cosmos, in Pauketat, T. R. and Emerson, T. E. (eds.), Cahokia: Domination and Ideology in the Mississippian World: 190–228. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, T. E. 2003. Cahokia and the evidence for late pre-Columbian warfare in the North American mid-continent. Paper presented at the 102nd annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Emerson, T. E. & Hughes, R. E.. 2000. Figurines, flint clay sourcing, the Ozark highlands, and Cahokian acquisition. American Antiquity 65:79–101.Google Scholar
Esarey, D. & Pauketat, T. R.. 1992. The Lohmann Site: An Early Mississippian Center in the American Bottom. American Bottom Archaeology, FAI-270 Site Reports, Volume 25. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, M. L., Rose, J., Vander Leest, B., & Ahler, S. A.. 1999. The Mound 72 Area: Dedicated and Sacred Space in Early Cahokia. Reports of Investigations, No. 54. Springfield: Illinois State Museum.Google Scholar
Gums, B. L. 1993. Groundstone Tools, Modified Rocks, and Exotic Materials from the Cahokia Mounds ICT-II. The Archaeology of the Cahokia Mounds ICT-II: Testing and Lithics, Part III, Illinois Cultural Resources Study No. 9. Springfield: Illinois Historic Preservation Agency.Google Scholar
Holley, G. R., Parker, K. E., Watters, H. W. Jr., Skele, M., & Ringering, J. E.. 2001. The Lembke Locality, Scott Joint-Use Archaeological Project: 259–444. Office of Contract Archaeology. Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Ives, D. J. 1984. The Crescent Hills Prehistoric Quarrying Area: More than Just Rocks, in Butler, B. M. and May, E.E. (eds.), Prehistoric Chert Exploitation: Studies from the Midcontinent: 187–195. Occasional Paper 2, Center for Archaeological Investigations. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. A. 2000. Gender and Power in Prehispanic Mesoamerica. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Koldehoff, B. 1990. Household Specialization: The Organization of Mississippian Chipped-Stone-Tool Production. Unpublished Masters thesis. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Koldehoff, B. & Carr, P. J.. 2001. Chipped stone technology: patterns of procurement, production, and consumption, in Wesler, K. (ed.), Excavations at Wickliffe Mounds, chapter 10 (CD-ROM). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Mason, R. J. & Perino, G.. 1961. Microblades at Cahokia, Illinois. American Antiquity 26:553–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorehead, W. K. 1922. The Cahokia Mounds: A Preliminary Report. University of Illinois Bulletin, Volume 19 (35). n.d. Untitled manuscript in the possession of Kenneth Farnsworth (personal communication, 2001).Google Scholar
Muller, J. 1997. Mississippian Political Economy. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R. 1993. Temples for Cahokia Lords: Preston Holder’s 1955–1956 Excavations of Kunnemann Mound. Museum of Anthropology, Memoir No. 26. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R. 1994. The Ascent of Chiefs: Cahokia and Mississippian Politics in Native North America. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R. 1997a. Cahokian Political Economy, in Pauketat, T. R. and Emerson, T. E. (eds.), Cahokia: Domination and Ideology in the Mississippian World: 30–51. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R. 1997b. Specialization, political symbols, and the crafty elite of Cahokia. Southeastern Archaeology 16:1–15.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R. 1998a. The Archaeology of Downtown Cahokia: The Tract 15A and Dunham Tract Excavations. Illinois Transportation Archaeological Research Program, Studies in Archaeology 1. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R. 1998b. Refiguring the archaeology of greater Cahokia. Journal of Archaeological Research 6:45–89.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R. 2000. The tragedy of the commoners, in Dobres, M.-A. and Robb, J. (eds.), Agency in Archaeology: 113–129. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R. 2003. Resettled farmers and the making of a Mississippian polity. American Antiquity 68:39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauketat, T. R. 2004a. Ancient Cahokia and the Mississippians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (in press).Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R. 2004b. The economy of the moment: cultural practices and Mississippian chiefdoms, in Feinman, G. M. & Nicholas, L. M. (eds.), The Economy of Chiefdoms and States: 25–39. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R. (ed.). 2004. The Archaeology of the East St. Louis Mound Center: Southside Excavations. Illinois Transportation Archaeological Research Program, Report of Investigations. Urbana: University of Illinois (in press).Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R. & Alt, S. M.. 2003. Mounds, Memory, and Contested Mississippian History, in Van Dyke, R. and Alcock, S. (eds.), Archaeologies of Memory: 151–179. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauketat, T. R., Kelly, L. S., Fritz, G. J., Lopinot, N. H., Elias, S., and Hargrave, E.. 2002. The residues of feasting and public ritual at early Cahokia. American Antiquity 67:257–279.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R. & Koldehoff, B.. 1998. The Becker collection, in Pauketat, T. R., Rees, M. A., & Pauketat, S. L., An Archaeological Survey of the Horseshoe Lake State Park, Madison County, Illinois. Reports of Investigations, No. 55: 107–112. Springfield: Illinois State Museum.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R., Kruchten, J., & Alt, S. M.. 2002. Phase II Cultural Resource Evaluation and Testing of the TRDS Property, Shiloh, Illinois. Report on file, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R., Rees, M. A., & Pauketat, S. L.. 1998. An Archaeological Survey of the Horseshoe Lake State Park, Madison County, Illinois. Reports of Investigations, No. 55. Springfield: Illinois State Museum.Google Scholar
Pauketat, T. R., & Woods, W. I.. 1986. Middle Mississippian structure analysis: The Lawrence Primas site (11-Ms-895) in the American Bottom. Wisconsin Archeologist 67:104–127.Google Scholar
Peterson, Haraold L. 1965. American Indian Tomahawks. Contributions from the Heye Foundation, volume 19. New York: Museum of the American Indian.Google Scholar
Porter, J. W. 1974. Cahokia Archaeology as Viewed from the Mitchell Site: A Satellite Community at A.D. 1150–1200. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Rau, C. 1869. A deposit of agricultural flint implements in southern Illinois. Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution for the Year 1868: 401–407. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Tolman, C. F. & Robertson, F.. 1969. Exposed Precambrian Rocks in Southeast Missouri. Rolla: Missouri Geological Survey and Water Resources, Report of Investigations 44.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, R. & Alcock, S. (eds.). 2003. Archaeologies of Memory. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, E. E. 1985. Archaeological Testing of the Bauman Site (23STG158), Ste. Genevieve County, Missouri. St. Louis District Cultural Resource Management Report No. 23. St. Louis: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.Google Scholar
Weiner, A. 1994. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping While Giving Away. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weller, S. & St. Clair, S.. 1928. Geology of Ste. Genevieve County, Missouri. Rolla: Missouri Bureau of Geology and Mines, volume 22 (second series).Google Scholar
Yerkes, R. W. 1991. Specialization in shell artefact production at Cahokia, in Stoltman, J. B. (ed.), New Perspectives on Cahokia: Views from the Periphery: 49–64. Madison, Wisconsin: Prehistory Press.Google Scholar