Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:15:02.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law and Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

H. J. Randall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 10 , Issue 38 , June 1936 , pp. 154 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The textual study of the Old Testament and of other authorities was then in a quite unadvanced condition. It is possible that Maine inferred the early admixture of retigion, law and morality from the Ten Commandments.

2 For example, the king sitting in the gate to determine disputes.

3 The most accessible work in English is the volume entitled General Survey in the Continental Legal History series. There is an admirable chapter by Professor Hazeltine, H.D. entitled ‘Roman and Canon Law in the Middle Ages’ in the Cambdge Medieera1 History, vol. 5.Google Scholar