Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:42:31.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Inscription of St. George of Baha

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Edward Ullendorff
Edward Ullendorff*
Affiliation:
Department of Oriental Languages, The University, St. Andrews
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Antiquity , Volume 29 , Issue 116 , December 1955 , pp. 237 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ANTIQUITY, 115, September 1955, 162-4.

2 C.S.C.O. 1907, 120 seqqGoogle Scholar. See also SirBudge's, E. A. Wallis History of Ethiopia, vol. 11, 359-75Google Scholar; Sabelli, Luca dei, Storia di Abissinia, vol. 11, 236-8Google Scholar; Guida dell'Africa Orientale Italiana, 539.

3 Cf. the present writer's forthcoming study on the ‘Hebraic-Jewish elements in Abyssinian (monophysite) Christianity’, especially the chapter on the Ark of the Covenant.

4 I have not got access to Cecchi's book at the time of writing and am therefore relying on Huntingford's reproduction.

5 Dengel (=Virgin) could here stand as the component element of either Sarsa Dengel or Za-Dengel (or Za-Maryam), the baptismal name of Badantcho, the chief of the Enarya (see Conti Rossini, loc. cit).

6 The covering of the tabot is the act of consecration, for it is the tabot and not the church building which is consecrated. Cecchi's gulo is an easily explicable ‘corruption’ of gäläwo and need not necessarily be due to faulty copying. For gäläwä in connexion with the Ark of the Covenant, see Dillmann, Lexicon Linguae Aethiopkae, col. 1140.

7 ‘House’ is supplied at the end of the line. The construction shows the influence of Amgharic syntax.

8 ‘Dengel’ is supplied, but the dots in Cecchi's copy (p. 164 in ANTIQUITY, 115) indicate an omission. The same applies to the end of the line.