Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:25:18.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distance and decay: an uneasy relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Angela E. Close
Angela E. Close*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Box 353100, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195–3100, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

lithicsel-AdamEgyptPleistoceneNabta playaEl Gebal el Beid
Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 73 , Issue 279 , March 1999 , pp. 24 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Close, A.E. 1984. Report on Site E-80–4, in Wendorf, Schild & Close, : 325–49.Google Scholar
Close, A.E. 1992. Holocene occupation of the Eastern Sahara, in Klees, F. & Kuper, R. (ed.), New light on the Northeast African past: 155–83. Cologne: Heinrich-Barth Institut.Google Scholar
Close, A.E. 1995. Few and far between: early ceramics in North Africa, in Barnett, W.K. & Hoopes, J.W. (ed.), The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation in ancient societies: 23–37. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Close, A.E. 1996a. Carry that weight: the use and transportation of stone tools, Current Anthropology 37: 545–53.Google Scholar
Close, A.E. 1996b. Plus ca change: the Pleistocene—Holocene transition in northeastern Africa, in Straus, L.G. Eriksen, B.V. Erlandson, J.M. & Yesner, D.R. (ed.), Humans at the end of the Ice Age: the archaeology of the Pleistocene-Holocene tran- sition: 43–60. New York (NY): Plenum.Google Scholar
Close, A.E. & Sampson, C.G.. 1998. Recent backed microlith production in central South Africa, Lithic Technology 23: 5–19.Google Scholar
Close, A.E. & Wendorf, F.. 1992. The beginnings of food-production in the Eastern Sahara, in Gebauer, A.B. & Price, T.D. (ed.), Transitions to agriculture in prehistory. 63–72. Madison (WI): Prehistory Press.Google Scholar
Feder, K.L. 1980. Waste not, want not: differential lithic utilization and efficiency of use, North American Archaeologist 2: 193–205.Google Scholar
Hofman, J.L. 1991. Folsom land use: projectile point variability as a key to mobility, in Montet-White, A. & Holen, S. (ed.), Raw material economies among prehistoric huntergatherers: 335–55. Lawrence (KS): University of Kansas. Publications in Anthropology.Google Scholar
Nelson, M.C. 1991. The study of technological organization, in Schiffer, M.B. (ed.), Archaeological method and theory 3: 57–100. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Newman, J.R. 1994. The effects of distance on lithic material reduction, Journal of Field Archaeology 21: 491–501.Google Scholar
Perles, C. 1992. In search of lithic strategies: a cognitive approach to prehistoric chipped stone assemblages, in Gardin, J.-C. & Peebles, C.S. (ed.), Representations in archaeology. 223–47. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, J., Mitchell, D.R. & Shackley, M.S.. 1997. The social and economic contexts of lithic procurement: obsidian from classic-period Hohokam sites, American Antiquity 62: 231–59.Google Scholar
Wendorf, F. & Schild, R.. 1984. Conclusions, in Wendorf, Schild & Close, : 404–28.Google Scholar
Wendorf, F.,Schild, R. (assemblers) & Close, A.E. (ed.). 1984. Cattle-keepers of the Eastern Sahara: the Neolithic of Bir Kiseiba. Dallas (TX): Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University.Google Scholar