Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:24:25.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct dating of rock art at Laurie Creek (NT), Australia: a reply to Nelson

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2015

T. H. Loy
T. H. Loy*
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistory, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

D.E. Nelson (1993), in the last ANTIQUITY, declared doubts about an old date for rock art in northern Australia we published in 1990. T.H. Loy, another co-author of the original paper, confirms his continuing confidence in the determination.

Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 68 , Issue 258 , March 1994 , pp. 147 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Loy, T.H. 1993. On the dating of prehistoric organic residues, Artefact 16: 46–9.Google Scholar
Loy, T.H., Jones, R., Nelson, D.E., Meehan, B., Vogel, J., Southon, J. & Cosgrove, R. 1990. Accelerator radiocarbon dating of human blood proteins in pigments from Late Pleistocene art sites in Australia, Antiquity 64: 110–16.Google Scholar
Nelson, D.E. 1993. Second thoughts on a rock–art date, Antiquity 67: 893–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watchman, A., Sirois, J. & Cole, N. 1993. Mineralogical examination of aboriginal rock painting pigments near Laura, north Queensland in Fankhauser, B. & Bird, J.R.(ed.), Archaeometry: current Australasian research Canberra: Australian National University, Department of Prehistory, RSPacS. Occasional paper in prehistory 22.Google Scholar