Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:29:48.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chiefly lineages in Kofun-period Japan: political relations between centre and region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Hiroshi Tsude*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Letters, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan

Extract

Mounded tomb burial for the elite is the hallmark of Japan’s Kofun period (AD 280-700) This is also known to be the period of state formation, and the burials of the paramount chiefs or early kings are concentrated in the present-day prefectures of Nara and Osaka. This centre of power will be referred to in this article as the ‘central court’, in contrast to the surrounding regions of western Honshu such as Kyoto, Hyogo, and Okayama prefectures, which also have many mounded tomb burials. The central court in the 4th century is often called the Miwa Court and in the 5th century the Kawachi Court. The extent of influence or control of the central court over the regions in these centuries is an issue addressed in the following discussion.

Type
Special section
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amakasu, K. 1980. The rebellion of the Musashino Kuni-no-miyatsuko, in Sugihara, S. & Takeuchi, R. (ed.), Kodai no Nihon 7: 13453. Tokyo: Kadokawa. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Barnes, G.L. 1988. Protohistoric Yamato: archaeology of the first Japanese state. Ann Arbor: Center for Japanese Studies and Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondo, Y. 1983. The period of the keyhole tombs. Tokyo: Iwanami. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Morgan, L.H. 1877. Ancient Sociey: researches in the lines of human progress from savagery through barbarism. New York: Henry Holt Google Scholar
Nishikawa, H. 1964. The nature of political authority in Kibi, in Society of Archaeological Studies (ed.), Nihon Kokogaku no Shomondai: Kokogaku Kenkyukai Jushunen kinen ronbunshu: 14571. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Onoyama, S. 1970. The sumptuary restrictions on tomb mounds in the 5th century AD, Kokogaku Kenkyu 16.3: 7383. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Tsude, H. 1974. Social group relations on the eve of the advent of mounded tombs, Kokogaku Kenkyu 20.4: 2047. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Tsude, H. 1983. The Kofun period, in Muko City History 1: 117186. Kyoto: Muko Municipal Government. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Tsude, H. 1988. Continuities and discontinuities in Kofun-period chiefly lineages, Machikaneyama Ronso 22: 116. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Tsude, H. 1989. Research into the formative process of agricultural society in Japan. Tokyo: Iwanami. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Wada, S. 1980. The survey of the mound of Itsuka-hara Tomb, in Onoyama, S. (ed.), Oryo no Hikaku Kenkyu: 4963. Kyoto: Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Letters, Kyoto University (in Japanese.]Google Scholar
Yoshida, A. 1973. Topics in the history OF ancient state formation in Japan: focussing on the system OF kuni-no-miyatsuko. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar