Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:05:24.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Archaeology: the loss of isolation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Christopher Tilley*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology/Institute of Archaeology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, England

Extract

It is interesting to reflect that only nine years separate David Clarke’s paper ‘Archaeology: the loss of innocence’ and the publication of Symbolic and structural archaeology (Hodder 1982), which may be taken to mark the beginning of a ‘post-processual’ archaeology. Many of the ideas put forward in that book were being discussed and developed at Cambridge from around 1978. David’s paper, and its publication in ANTIQUITY, may be taken as representing the highwater mark of ‘new’ or processual archaeology in the academy. Almost as soon as the ideas had been presented, and not really very well developed in the practice of doing archaeology, they were under fire and being replaced. Yet David was still attacking ‘traditional’ archaeology, fighting for his own position in the 1973 paper, and putting foward an agenda for the future of archaeology. It was a manifesto for future work. New Archaeology was then 11 years old and had already achieved a certain hegemony in Anglo-American archaeology, at least among younger academics more interested in ideas than recovering and describing evidence. In 1998 what is labelled ‘post-processual’ archaeology differs fundamentally from many of the ideas presented in the Hodder volume and it is doubtful whether anyone would still wish to follow David’s agenda or advocate early ‘post-processual’ ideas. The pace of thinking has inexorably heated up. Both David’s paper and the Hodder book are now primarily of historical interest in the development of a disciplinary consciousness in which archaeology is becoming increasingly self-reflexive, critically interrogating its intellectual presuppositions, procedures and practices.

Type
Special section: David Clarke's ‘Archaeology: the loss of innocence’ (1973) 25 years after
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hodder, I. (ed.). 1982. Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. 1973. Concluding address, in Renfre, C. (ed.), The explanation of culture change: 76171. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar