Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:39:55.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antlers, bone pins and flint blades: the Mesolithic cemeteries of Téviec and Hoëdic, Brittany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Rick J. Schulting
Rick J. Schulting*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Reading, Box 218, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AA, England. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The late Mesolithic sites of Téviec and Hoëdic, located on what are now small islands off the Breton coast, provide evidence for elaborate burial practices, and may be precursors of the megalithic tradition of Brittany and western Europe in general. This paper briefly summarizes what is known of the sites and examines patterning in the distribution of grave inclusions. Differences as well as similarities between the sites are found. When examined carefully and critically, older excavation reports can yield much new information.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 70 , Issue 268 , June 1996 , pp. 335 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrethsen, S. E. & Petersen, E. Brinch. 1976. Excavation of a Mesolithic cemetery at Vedbæk, Denmark, Acta Archaeo-logica 47: 1–28.Google Scholar
Bender, B. 1985. Prehistoric developments in the American Midcontinent and in Brittany, in Price, T. D. & Brown, J. A. (ed.), Prehistoric hunter-gatherers: the emergence of cultural complexity: 21–57. Madison (WI): Prehistory Press.Google Scholar
Bender, B. 1986. The archaeology of Brittany, Normandy and the Channel Islands. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1962. Archaeology as anthropology, American Antiquity 28: 217–25.Google Scholar
Boujot, C. & Cassen, S.. 1993. A pattern of evolution for the Neolithic funerary structures of the west of France, Antiquity 67: 477–91.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. 1981. The emergence of formal disposal areas and the ‘problem’ of megalithic tombs in prehistoric Europe, in Kinnes, I. et al. (ed.), The archaeology of death: 71–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, G. & Neeley, M.. 1987. Social differentiation in European Mesolithic burial data, in Rowley-Conwy, P. et al. (ed.), Mesolithic northwest Europe: recent trends: 121–7. Sheffield: Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, Sheffield University.Google Scholar
Delibrias, G., Guillier, M.-T. & Labeyrie, J.. 1966. Gif natural radiocarbon measurements II, Radiocarbon 8: 74–95.Google Scholar
Geddes, D. 1985. Mesolithic domesticated sheep in west Mediterranean Europe, Journal of Archaeological Science 12: 25–48.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L. G. 1980. Mississippian mortuary practices: a case study of two cemeteries in the Lower Illinois Valley. Evanston (IL): Northwestern Archaeological Program.Google Scholar
Hibbs, J. 1983. The Neolithic of Brittany and Normandy, in Scarre, C. (ed.), Ancient France: Neolithic societies and their landscapes 6000–2000 BC: 271–323. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, K. 1995. Returning to Oleni' ostrov: social, economic, and skeletal dimensions of a boreal forest Mesolithic cemetery, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 14: 359–403.Google Scholar
Kayser, O. 1986. Les amas coquilliers d'Armorique, Archeologia 218: 68–74.Google Scholar
Kayser, O. & Bernier, P.. 1988. Nouveaux objets décorés du Mésolithique Armoricain, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 85: 45–7.Google Scholar
Kinnes, I. 1982. Les Fouaillages and megalithic origins, Antiquity 56: 24–30.Google Scholar
Kirk, T. 1993. Space, subjectivity, power and hegemony: megaliths and long mounds in earlier Neolithic Brittany, in Tilley, (ed.): 181–223.Google Scholar
Larsson, L. (ed.). 1988. The Skateholm Project I: Man and environment. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. Acta Regiae Societatis Hurnaniorum Litterarum Ludensis 79.Google Scholar
Larsson, L. 1989. Late Mesolithic settlements and cemeteries at Skate-holm, southern Sweden, in Bonsall, C. (ed.), The Mesolithic in Europe: 367–78. Edinburgh: John Donald.Google Scholar
Leonard, R. D. & Jones, G. T. (ed.). 1989. Quantifying diversity in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, W. K. 1990. Investigating style: an exploratory analysis of some Plains burials, in Conkey, M. & Hastorf, C. (ed.), The uses of style in archaeology. 52–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marshack, A. 1972. The roots of civilization. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mohen, J.-P. 1990. The world of megaliths. New York (NY): Facts On File.Google Scholar
Newell, R. R. 1984. On the Mesolithic contribution to the social evolution of western European society, in Bintliff, J. (ed.), European social evolution: archaeological perspectives: 69–82. Bradford: Bradford University Press.Google Scholar
Newell, R. R. & Constandse-Westermann, T. S.. 1988. The significance of Skateholm I and Skateholm II to the Mesolithic of western Europe, in Larsson, (ed.): 164–74.Google Scholar
Newell, R. R. & Constandse-Westermann, T. S.. In preparation. The mortuary practices of the Mesolithic societies in western Europe I: The nine later Mesolithic cemeteries. Google Scholar
Newell, R. R., Constandse-Westermann, T. S. & Meiklejohn, C.. 1979. The skeletal remains of Mesolithic man in western Europe: an evaluative catalogue, Journal of Human Evolution 8: 1–228.Google Scholar
O'Shea, J. M. 1984. Mortuary variability: an archaeological investigation. Orlando (FL): Academic Press.Google Scholar
O'Shea, J.M. & Zvelebil, M.. 1984. Oleneostrovski mogilnik: reconstructing the social and economic organisation of prehistoric foragers in northern Russia, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 3: 1–40.Google Scholar
Paludan-Müller, C. 1978. High Atlantic food gathering in northwestern Zealand: ecological conditions and spatial representation, Studies in Scandinavian prehistory and early history 1: 120–57.Google Scholar
Patton, M. 1993. Statements in stone: monuments and society in Neolithic Brittany. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Péquart, M. & Péquart, S. J.. 1954. Hoëdic, deuxième station-nécropole du Mésolithique côtier Armoricain. Anvers: De Sikkel.Google Scholar
Péquart, M., Péquart, S.J., Boule, M. & Vallois, H.. 1937. Téviec, station-nécropole du Mésolithique du Morbihan. Paris: Archives de L'Institut de Paléontologie Humaine XVIII.Google Scholar
Persson, O. & Persson, E.. 1988. Anthropological report concerning the interred Mesolithic populations from Skateholm, southern Sweden: excavation seasons 1983–1984, in Larsson, (ed.): 89–105.Google Scholar
Poissonnier, B. & Kayser, O.. 1988. Les bois de cerfs Mésolithiques de Beg-er-Vil à Quiberon (Morbihan), Revue Archéologique de l'Ouest 5: 35–43.Google Scholar
Ravesloot, J. C. 1988. Mortuary practices and social differentiation at Casa Grandes, Chihuahua, Mexico. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1976. Megaliths, territories and populations, in De Laet, S. J. (ed.), Acculturation and continuity in Atlantic Europe: 198–220. Bruges: De Tempel.Google Scholar
Rothschild, N. A. 1990. Prehistoric dimensions of status: gender and age in eastern North America. New York (NY): Garland.Google Scholar
Rozoy, J.-G. 1978. Les derniers chasseurs: l'Épipaléolithique en France at en Belgique. Essai de synthèse. Charleville: Bulletin de la Société Archéologique Champenoise, J.-G. Rozoy.Google Scholar
Schulting, R. J. 1995a. Mortuary variability and status differentiation on the Columbia-Fraser Plateau. Burnaby: Archaeology Press, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Schulting, R. J. 1995b. Age and sex differences in burial inclusions on the Plateau. Paper presented at the 28th Meeting of the Canadian Archaeological Association, Kelowna, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. 1990. The genesis of megaliths: monumentality, ethnicity and social complexity in Neolithic northwest Europe, World Archaeology 22: 147–67.Google Scholar
Solberg, B. 1989. The Neolithic transition in southern Scandinavia: internal development or migration?, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 8: 261–96.Google Scholar
Taborin, Y. 1974. La parure en coquillage, Gallia Préhistoire 17: 101–79.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. & Tilley, C.. 1993. The axe and the torso: symbolic structures in the Neolithic of Brittany, in Tilley, (ed.): 225–324.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. (ed.). 1993. Interpretative archaeology. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Weiss, K. M. 1973. Demographic models for anthropology. Washington (DC): Society for American Archaeology. Memoir 27. Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. 1983. Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points, American Antiquity 48: 253–73.Google Scholar
Winters, H. D. 1968. Value systems and trade cycles of the Late Archaic in the Midwest, in Binford, S. R. & Binford, L. R. (ed.), New perspectives in archaeology. 175–221. Chicago (IL): Aldine.Google Scholar
Zilhāo, J. 1993. The spread of agro-pastoral economies across Mediterranean Europe: a view from the far west, Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 6: 5–63.Google Scholar