^{page 1 note 1} B.M.Q. iii (1929), 4, pp. 97–9Google Scholar , pl. l, li.

^{page 2 note 1} Pârvan, V., Getica, Bucarest, 1926, pp. 1–40Google Scholar , and Dacia, Cambridge, 1928, 34–73.Google ScholarFettich, N., ‘La Trouvaille Scythe de Zöldhalompuszta près de Miskolc, Hongrie’, in Arckaeologia Hungarica, III, Budapest (1928), pp. 37–42Google Scholar ; Childe, V. G., The Danube in Prehistory, Oxford (1929), pp. 394–7Google Scholar.

^{page 2 note 2} Filov, B., Bulletin (Izvestiya) de l'institut Arch. Bulgare, IV (1927), pp. 27–60.Google Scholar

^{page 3 note 1} Altai-Iran, p. 122.

^{page 4 note 1} M.A.R. 34 (1914)Google Scholar , ‘The Archaic Period in South Russia’.

^{page 4 note 2} First in Turán, 05 1918, p. 273.Google Scholar

^{page 6 note 1} Materialy po Etnografii, IV, 2 (1929), pp. 41–60.Google Scholar

^{page 7 note 1} ‘Antiquities of Katanda, Altai’, J. R.A.I. lv (1926), pp. 37–57Google Scholar ; ci. his ‘Ancient Wood and Bone Work from the Altai’, Ant. Jour. vi (1926), p. 410Google Scholar.

^{page 8 note 1} Besides the Russian report see Yetts, , Burlington Magazine, 04 1926Google Scholar ; J. R. A. S. 1929, p. 229Google Scholar ; new pieces in Ausstellung Chinesischer Kunst, Berlin, 1929Google Scholar.

^{page 8 note 2} For Tangut see Devéria, , L'Écriture du Royaume de Si-hia ou Tangout, Paris, 1898Google Scholar ; the writings of A. I. Ivanov, the chief authority, are inaccessible to me, but see Journal Asiatique, 1920, p. 107Google Scholar ; there is a new bilingual, Stein, , Innermost Asia, pl. cxxxiv.Google ScholarOm mani padmi hum, see Bushell, , Chinese Art, i, p. 36 and fig. 25Google Scholar.

^{page 12 note 1} Cf. Report of Japanese Investigations in South Corea, vol. ii (Daisho II = 1923), Pl. 9, 10, 12.Google Scholar

^{page 12 note 2} Documents, i, p. 19.

^{page 12 note 3} Professor Pelliot, , Documents, i, p. 11Google Scholar , is a little hard on me for rash remarks on mirrors made fifteen years ago: I long ago had observed that I had misunderstood what Professor Giles told me orally about the writing of the Chinese words.

^{page 13 note 1} Pelliot, P., Jades Archaïques de la Chine, Paris, 1925, pl. xxx.Google Scholar

^{page 16 note 1} Minns, p. 178, f. 73 = Smêla, III. x. 2.

^{page 17 note 1} Borovka, 8 A, C, cf. B: Minns, p. 209, fig. 109, and Rostovtsev, passim.

^{page 17 note 2} Borovka, 11 G; Minns, p. 267, fig. 184.

^{page 17 note 3} Smêla, III, xviii, II.

^{page 17 note 4} Revue des Arts Asiatiques, 1924, 3, p. 14Google Scholar , fig. 2; Documents, i, p. 21.

^{page 18 note 1} Animal Style, pp. 42 and 58, pl. xii, 1, 2; Σκυθικά. Α', p. 16, and pls. v, vi, 22-30.

^{page 18 note 2} Animal Style, pl. xxviii, 6.

^{page 20 note 1} Mater, for Arch. Cauc. (M.A.K.) viii, xcii, 13.

^{page 20 note 2} e. g. K. T. R., fig. 472, fig. 425 = Chantre, III, vi, 7 ; C.R. Arch. Com. 1904, p. 132Google Scholar , fig. 244, from Audi, Echedit, Daghestan.

^{page 20 note 3} e. g. Aspelin, one-headed, 700, 982, two-headed, 677, 701, 984, etc., see Tallgren, , E. S. A., iii, p. 86Google Scholar.

^{page 20 note 4} Such as Chantre, 11, xxvi, 2, lvii, 1, 2, 3.

^{page 21 note 1} M. A. K., viii, lxix, 1, 2, Stepan Tsminda; lxxxix, 4, Kumbulta; cxviii, 26, Komunta; p. 353, fig. 278, Racha; cf. Chantre, 11, lviii, 1-5; III, iii, 7, v, 1. A new example particularly like pl. iv, 4, is a deer of cast bronze about 9 cm. long with a loop below, from Dzherakh in Daghestan, , Bulletin (Izvestiya) of the Ingush Scientific Institute for Local Lore, I, Vladikavkaz, 1928, pp. 194, 195Google Scholar , Semënov, L. P., ‘Arch, and Ethn. Researches in Ingushia’, 1925–7.Google Scholar The development of these Institutes of Local Lore (Kraevedenie) in modern Russia is remarkable.

^{page 21 note 2} Our knowledge of Chinese mirrors confirms A. D. dates, see Jolly, , Praeh. Zeitschrift, xix (1928), 3, 4Google Scholar.