Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:19:11.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Saxon and Norman Pottery from Colchester Castle Park

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

Extract

The pottery is divided into four groups according to the stratigraphical evidence, which is given in detail in the descriptions of the pottery on pp. 66–67. With one exception (group 1, no. 1), which is a stray of earlier date, all the pottery may be regarded as contemporary, since even the latest, group 4 from pit C1, was sealed by the old turf-line over the Norman Bank. There is no historical evidence for the construction of this Bank, but since it is not in alignment with the Castle Keep, built c. 1076–86, it is believed to be slightly later in date. It may be said at once that no appreciable difference in date can be detected between the pottery of groups 2, 3, and 4. Comparison with dated material found elsewhere in England suggests that the pottery is not later than the early part of the twelfth century, but closer dating is provided by comparison with material from Colchester Castle itself. This consists of four sherds, including the angle of a sagging base, obtained from the foundation trench of the Castle Keep in 1931–2, which Mr. Hull kindly sent to me for examination. Although so few in number, the ware of these sherds is consistent and agrees precisely with that of groups 2, 3, and 4 as described below. The date of these groups, and therefore of the Norman Bank, is thus as close to the date of the Keep as the sequence of construction will allow. On balance, the available evidence points to a date within the period c. 1080–1100 for the Norman Bank.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 62 note 1 e.g. Little Wilbraham, Cambs., Lethbridge, T. C., Recent Excavations in Anglo-Saxon cemeteries in Cambridgeshire and Suffolk (1931)Google Scholar, pl. vi. Hut on the Car Dyke at Waterbeach, Antiq. Journ. vii, 143, fig. 3. Hut-site at Tye, Bulmer, Essex, Medieval Archaeology, iii (1959), 282, fig. 99Google Scholar.

page 62 note 2 Hurst, J. G., ‘Saxo-Norman Pottery in East Anglia’, Proc. Cambridge Antiq. Soc. xlix (1956)Google Scholar, 43 ff., 1 (1957), 29 ff., and li (1958), 37 ff.

page 62 note 3 Proc. Cambridge Antiq. Soc. li (1958), 62–63.

page 63 note 1 Two sources have been suggested for the shell, either fresh-water mussels from streams or the shell-marls of the districts. See remarks by Mr. Jope, E. M. in Oxoniensia, xxiii (1958), 49Google Scholar, and Antiq. Journ. xxxix, 245.

page 63 note 2 Proc. Cambridge Antiq. Soc. 1 (1957), 46, fig. 6, 1–2.

page 63 note 3 Medieval Archaeology, iii (1959), 39, fig. 15, 2.

page 63 note 4 Proc. Cambridge Antiq. Soc. xlix (1956), 58 ff., figs. 4, 7, and 8.

page 64 note 1 Antiq. Journ. xv, 174.

page 64 note 2 Oxoniensia, xvii–xviii (1952–3), 77 ff.

page 64 note 3 Medieval Archaeology, iii (1959), 34, fig. 11.

page 66 note 1 Medieval Archaeology, iii (1959), 44.

page 66 note 2 Information from Group-Captain G. M. Knocker.

page 66 note 3 Proc. Cambridge Antiq. Soc. 1 (1957), 53, fig. 8.