¹ The findspot can be fairly closely located from Stukeley's description, at NGR SK 446365.

² Haverfield, F., ‘Roman silver in Northumberland’, J. Roman Stud. iv (1914), 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brendel, O., ‘The Corbridge Lanx’, J. Roman Stud. xxxi (1941), 100CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³ Curle, Alexander, The Treasure of Traprain (Glasgow, 1923).Google Scholar

⁴ Painter, K. S., The Mildenhall Treasure (British Museum Publ., 1977).Google Scholar

⁵ Painter, K. S., The Water Newton Early Christian Silver (British Museum Publ., 1977).Google Scholar

⁶ In particular, the very large silver treasure found in 1962 at Kaiseraugst, Switzerland. Full publication of this material is in progress, but a basic catalogue is available, Laur-Belart, R., Der spätrömische Silberschatz von Kaiseraugst (Augst, 1963)Google Scholar, and a number of the major pieces are described and illustrated in a British Museum exhibition catalogue, Kent, J. P. C. and Painter, K. S. (eds.), Wealth of the Roman World (British Museum Publ., 1977)Google Scholar.

⁷ Stukeley, William, An Account of a Large Silver Plate of antique basso relievo, Roman workmanship, found in Derbyshire, 1729 (London, 1736).Google Scholar

⁸ Though the printed version gives the date 8th April 1736, the Minute Book of the Society of Antiquaries of London gives the date as 7th April, which seems more likely to be correct.

⁹ Morin, G., ‘Le Missorium de Saint Exupère’, Milanges d'Archéologie et d'Histoire, xviii (1898), 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁰ The Family Memoirs of the Rev. William Stukeley, M.D., ii (Surtees Society, lxxvi, 1883), 113Google Scholar: the date of the letter is given there as 18th December 1729, whereas in the copy of the text in the Society of Antiquaries Minute Book, Vol. II, 106, it is 2nd December. I have followed the text of the latter copy, which differs in some small respects from the printed version, but is essentially the same.

¹¹ The printed version of the letter, followed by Morin, gives Boojcensi, the Society of Antiquaries copy, Boojeensi.

¹² The word-order of this sentence differs slightly in the two versions, but appears to be incomplete in both.

¹³ In the published version, Meldunensis.

¹⁴ The Family Memoirs of the Rev. William Stukeley, M.D., i (Surtees Society, lxxiii, 1880), 226.Google Scholar

¹⁵ British Library shelfmark 457.g.10. This copy contains the Risley Park engraving and the de la Rue note, but not the engraving of the Corbridge lanx. The latter is present in the British Library's Grenville Library copy, shelfmark G.2643.

¹⁶ Rue, G. de la (translated Douce, F.), ‘Memoir on the celebrated Tapestry of Bayeux’, Archaeologia, xvii (1814), 91–2.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Daniel, and Lysons, Samuel, Magna Britannia (London, 1806–22)Google Scholar: Derbyshire, Vol. V (1817), ccvii.

¹⁸ Cabrol, F., Leclercq, H., Dictionnaire d'archéologie chrétienne et de liturgie (Paris, Vol. IV, 1921)Google Scholar, (I), cols. 1180–1182. The entry for the Risley Park lanx in this work, rather surprisingly to be found under the heading “Disque”, uses Morin's drawing, taken from the Stukeley engraving, and follows Morin's conclusions very closely. The dimensions of the vessel are given as 12 x 80 in., a misprint for Gale's incorrect 12 x 8 in.

¹⁹ V.C.H. Derbyshire, vol. I (1905), p. 261.Google Scholar

²⁰ Dohrn, T., “Spätantikes Silber aus Britannien”, Mitteilungen des deutschen archäologischen Instituts (1949), 117–18.Google Scholar

²¹ Strong, Donald, Greek and Roman Gold and Silver Plate (London, 1966), pp. 19, 185, 198.Google Scholar

²² Morin, , op. cit. (n. 9 above).Google Scholar

²³ Society of Antiquaries, Drawings, Vol. II, 304Google Scholar. Below the sketch, in Stukeley's hand, is written, “A piece of the Roman silver plate, found in Derbyshire in Lady Gray's park, A^o 1726. Stukeley f.” This is the only time that the date differs from the accepted one of 1729, and it is surely simply a careless error here.

²⁴ Morin, , op. cit., 373.Google Scholar

²⁵ In Drexel's typology ( Drexel, F., “Alexandrinische Silbergefässe der Kaiserzeit”, Bonner Jahrbücher, 118 (1909), 176Google Scholar ), the form is no. 1, and the Risley Park vessel is discussed on pp. 183–4. Drexel bases the form solely on the profile, making no distinction between circular, rectangular or other shapes.

²⁶ Hilgers, W., Lateinische Gefässnamen (Düsseldorf, 1969), pp. 206–9.Google Scholar

²⁷ e.g. Cabrol, loc. cit.

²⁸ Strong, , op. cit., p. 194.Google Scholar

²⁹ Laur-Belart, , op. cit., no. 1.Google ScholarKent, & Painter, op. cit. in note 6 above, no. 80Google Scholar.

³⁰ Curie, , op. cit. (n. 3), no. 88, p. 61.Google Scholar

³¹ Grünhagen, W., Der Schatzfund von Gross Bodungen (Römisch-germanische Forschungen, Band 21, Berlin, 1954), 39–49.Google Scholar

³² Laur-Belart, , op. cit., no. 3.Google Scholar

³³ Hayes, John, Late Roman Pottery, (London, 1972), pp. 284–5.Google Scholar

³⁴ Salomonson, J. W., “Late-Roman Earthen-ware with relief decoration found in northern Africa and Egypt”, Oudheidkundige Mededelingen, xliii (1962), 24Google ScholarWace, Alan, “Late Roman Pottery & Plate”, Bull. de la Soc. Royale d'Archéologie d'Alexandria, xxxvii (1948), 11.Google Scholar

³⁵ Salomonson, , op. cit., 74–81Google Scholar, fig. 6 and pl. XXIV, 2.

³⁶ For a summary of this myth in art, see Daltrop, G., Die kalydonische Jagd in der Antike (Hamburg, 1966)Google Scholar; for an example on silver-ware considerably later than the Risley Park lanx, see Kent, & Painter, , op. cit, no. 160 (7th century A.D.)Google Scholar.

³⁷ Furtwängler, A., Die antiken Gemmen, Vol. iii (Berlin/Leipzig, 1900), pp. 364–5.Google ScholarDelbrueck, R., Spätantike Kaiserporträts (Berlin/Leipzig, 1933), p. 152Google Scholar and Taf. 74.

³⁸ Kent, & Painter, , op. cit., no. 99.Google Scholar

³⁹ Painter, , op. cit. in note 4, no. 7, fig. 20.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Morin, , op. cit., 364.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Strong, , op cit., pl. 47 A.Google Scholar

⁴² Stanfield, J. S. & Simpson, Grace, Central Gaulish Potters (Oxford, 1958), pl. 52; pp. 605, 606.Google Scholar

⁴³ e.g. Strong, , op. cit., pl. 51 B.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Painter, , op. cit. in n.4, nos. 7–10.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ For the Carthage Treasure generally, with references, see Kent, & Painter, , op. cit., p. 50Google Scholar.

⁴⁶ Ibid., no. 88.

⁴⁷ Dohrn, , op. cit., 117.Google Scholar‘… die Weihinschrift auf der Unterseite des breiten Randes …‘

⁴⁸ Morin, , op. cit., 374.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ I am greatly indebted to Professor A. L. F. Rivet for all the material in this paragraph. Professor Rivet considers that the readings suggesting Bayeux may be discounted, and one should therefore return to Bogiensi or a different misreading based upon it.

⁵⁰ Dép. Indre, 25 km. north of Chateauroux and 50 km. west of Bourges.

⁵¹ Dauzat, A., Dictionnaire étymologique des noms de lieux en France (Paris, 1963).Google Scholar

⁵² Holder, A., Alt-celtischer Sprachschatz, Vol. I (Leipzig, 1896), p. 462Google Scholar, and Evans, D. Ellis, Gaulish Personal Names (Oxford, 1967), p. 152Google Scholar (Bogio-). The graffito BOGI … on a vessel from London, recorded both by Holder and in CIL vii, 1336 as being in the British Museum collection should be in the Department of Prehistoric & Romano-British Antiquities. Unfortunately, the writer has so far failed to locate it: the information given in the references is too slight to enable a proper search to be made.

⁵³ My colleague Patsy Vanags has suggested a link here with the Bodeni of the inscription on the Thruxton (Hants) mosaic pavement (Hinks, R. P., Catalogue of the Greek, Etruscan and Roman Paintings and Mosaics in the British Museum, (London, 1933), M. 35, p.101).Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Ausonius, , Prof. XVIIGoogle Scholar, and Jones, A. H. M., Martindale, J. R. and Morris, J., The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire (Cambridge, 1971), p. 321Google Scholar.

⁵⁵ in litt. I am very much indebted to Dr. Martindale for his help on this problem.

⁵⁶ Dohrn, , op. cit., 118.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ For a very brief survey of the range and quantity of late Roman silver from Britain, see Johns, C., “Les somptueux tréors d'argenterie”, in Les Romains en Grande Bretagne, Dossiers de l'Archéologie, no. 37 (Sept. 1979), 51Google Scholar.

⁵⁸ Dorchester (Oxfordshire): Franks, , Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London, 2nd Series, V (1870-1873), 321Google Scholar; Dorchester (Dorset): Dalton, , Antiquaries Journal, ii (1922), 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Great Horwood: Waugh, , Antiquaries Journal, xlvi (1966), 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Canterbury: Painter, , Journal of the British Archaeological Association, xxviii (1965), 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Biddulph: Painter, , Antiquaries Journal, lv (1975), 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁵⁹ Burnett, A. & Johns, C., in Carson, R. A. G. & Burnett, A. (editors), Recent Coin Hoards from Roman Britain (British Museum Occasional Paper no. 5, 1979), p. 110.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Curle, , op. cit. Mattingly, H.et al., Antiquity, xi (1937), 39Google Scholar(Coleraine), and Kent, & Painter, , op. cit., p. 125Google Scholar.

⁶¹ Painter, , op cit. in note 5 above.Google Scholar

⁶² Ibid., nos. 8 and 9.