^{page 116 note 2} Arch. Cant, xxvi, 9 seqq.; Antiq. Journ. x, 166–7.

^{page 116 note 3} , Jessup, op. cit. 132, 134Google Scholar.

^{page 116 note 4} Arch. Journ. lxxxvii, 240 seqq., esp. 255.

^{page 116 note 5} Antiq. Journ. viii, 84.

^{page 116 note 6} Antiq. Journ. iv, 352–3, fig.3 (with fig. 9); Archaeologia, lxxvi, 19–21.

^{page 116 note 7} Antiq. Journ. viii, 453–8.

^{page 116 note 8} Prof. Ward Perkins's excavations are to be published in the forthcoming number of Archaeologia Canttana

^{page 118 note 1} In a paper on the pottery from the Caburn, near Lewes, and its implications, read before the Society on 9 March 1939 in conjunction with Dr.Curwen, E. Cecil, F.S.A. This is to appear in full in Sussex Archaeological Collections, vol. lxxxGoogle Scholar.

^{page 118 note 2} The same method has been employed in repuWishing the Park Brow pieces in the forthcoming Caburn paper.

^{page 118 note 3} Cf. with Mr. Smith's fig. 15, a-e, the bases Arch, lxxvi, 19, fig.10 A-B (Park Brow) and Antiq. Journ. viii, 455–6, figs, qd and Si (Findon Park).

^{page 118 note 4} Cf., Morel, La Champagne Souterraine, album, pl. 41, no. 22Google Scholar: the incisions were perhaps, as there, filled with colouring matter.

^{page 118 note 5} Cf. Morel, ibid., pl. 4, nos. 4, 12; pl. 5, no. 6; pl. 20, one from right in central group, and middle bottom; pl. 41, 17.

^{page 119 note 1} Cf. Morel, ibid. pl. 32, nos. 6 and 8.

^{page 118 note 2} I have to thank Mr. Clarke for allowing me to read this in typescript; it is hoped that it will appear in the Archaeological Journal during 1940.

^{page 118 note 3} Arch. Camb. 06 1927, 67–112Google Scholar.

^{page 120 note 1} Viollier, D., Les Sépultures du Second Åge du Fer sur le Plateau Suisse (1916)Google Scholar.

^{page 120 note 2} Findo n Park: Arch, lxxvi, 11, fig. G (bropch) found in same pit as the two pots (21) figs. 11–12., Swallowcliffe: Wilts. Arch. Mag. xliii, 82, pl. xi, c. 36 (brooch)Google Scholar; pottery, e.g. 71, pl. iv, 4, 6 (cf. from Fifield Bavant, ibid, xlii, 477, pl. vn, 1–4). The glass beads from Swallowcliffe (xliii, 30–1, pl. vn, F 1–4) require the same context.

^{page 120 note 1} 3 Fox's list no. 34;, Greenwell, British Barrows, 209, fig. 111Google Scholar;, Evans, Ancient Bronze Implements, 400, fig. 498Google Scholar.

^{page 120 note 4} This is in any case certainly true of Scotland:, Childe, Antiq. Journ. xi, 281–2Google Scholar; Prehistory of Scotland, 231, 236.

^{page 120 note 5} Fox's list nos. 5 8–9; Cunnington, All Cannings Cross, pl. xvm, figs. 12–13.

^{page 120 note 6} This dating is discussed in the Caburn paper referred to above (p. 118, n. 1).