^{page 281 note 1} A correction is needed in Dr. Fox's list. That scheduled under Berks., Drayton, should be under Oxon., Drayton St. Leonard (see Archaeologia, lxxi, 241). Also the Wytham example, mentioned as doubtful, is, though only a fragment, unquestionably part of a beaker of a fairly large size. In form and decoration it is not unlike the new Eynsham beaker, but there are no signs of a handle.

^{page 281 note 2} Arch. Cambr., 1927, pp. 67 ff.

^{page 281 note 3} Antiquity, v, pp. 60 ff.

^{page 281 note 4} Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., xxxiii (1898), p. 18.Google Scholar

^{page 282 note 1} 282Déchelette, Manuel, ii, p. 988; there are examples as far north as the Departments of Nord and Aisne, and Namur in Belgium.

^{page 282 note 2} Trans. Birm. Arch. Soc. iii, p. 282.

^{page 282 note 3} Trans. Bute Arch. Soc, 1925, p. 59, and figs. 43–4.