Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T16:25:35.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Fragment of Medieval Painting Discovered Next to St Bartholomew the Great, Smithfield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2011

Extract

In 1985, excavations by the Department of Urban Archaeology in Kinghorn Street, adjacent to St Bartholomew the Great, resulted in the discovery of one of the most important pieces of medieval painting to have been found in the City of London (colour plate 1).

Discovered in two halves, the painted stone had been reused in a sixteenth- or seventeenth-century well construction immediately to the east of the church. The curved right edge of the stone probably derives from this secondary usage. When found, the two pieces were covered in lime mortar, to which, unfortunately, some of the paint layer transferred. The fragment is now in the Museum of London, where the two halves have been rejoined and other conservation work has been undertaken.

Type
Shorter Contributions
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Binski, P 1995. Westminster Abbey and the Plantagenets: Kingship and the Representation of Power, 1200–1400, New Haven and LondonGoogle Scholar
Coldstream, N 1994. The Decorated Style: Architecture and Ornament 1240–1360, LondonGoogle Scholar
Ganiaris, H 1994. ‘KHN 85: painted stone fragments’, unpublished Museum of London Department of Conservation reportGoogle Scholar
Julien, S 1995. ‘Technical report: accession number KHN 85 [+]II’, unpublished Museum of London Department of Conservation reportGoogle Scholar
Spooner, J 2000. ‘St Bartholomew the Great: scientific examination of the excavated painted fragment “KHN 85 [+]ii” now at the Museum of London’, unpublished report, Courtauld Institute of ArtGoogle Scholar