^{page 269 note 1} An interim report appeared in Antiq. Journ., xlviii (1968), 210–30Google Scholar.

^{page 270 note 1} V.C.H. Northants. I, 1902, 244-5, fig. 9; Fox, C., The Archaeology of the Cambridge Region, 1923, 253, pl. XXXVI, 10Google Scholar.

^{page 270 note 2} B.R.O.B. 19, 1969, 166-7, fig. 4, 6 (Great Chesterford, Essex) with further references.

^{page 270 note 3} Champollion, J. F., Lettre à M. Dacier relative l'alphabet des hiéroglyphes phonétiques (Paris, 1822)Google Scholar.

^{page 270 note 4} [Edwards, E.], Descriptive Catalogue of the Medals Struck in France … in the British Museum (London, 1837), no. 595Google Scholar.

^{page 270 note 5} Head, Barclay V., A Guide to the Principal Coins of the Greeks from circ. 700 B.C. to A.D. 270 (London, 1959), pl. 46, no. 12, and p. 84Google Scholar.

^{page 270 note 6} Sauzet, A., Desaix, le ‘Sultan Juste1 (Paris, 1954), p. 308Google Scholar.

^{page 270 note 7} Edwards, E., The Napoleon Medals (London, 1837), p. 141Google Scholar.

^{page 271 note 1} Dawson, Warren R. and Uphill, Eric P., Who Was Who in Egyptology (2nd edn. rev. London, 1972), p. 36Google Scholar.

^{page 271 note 2} Wallis-Budge, E. A., The Rosetta Stone (London, 1922), p. 2Google Scholar.

^{page 271 note 3} Archaeologia xvi (1812), 212–14Google Scholar.

^{page 271 note 4} Vetusta Monumenta iv (1803), pls. 5–7Google Scholar.

^{page 273 note 1} Cf. Toynbee, J. M. C., Art in Britain under Romans (Oxford, 1964), p. 367Google Scholar, with references cited. I am much indebted to Mr. Henig for supplying a specialist report on the two pendants, on which the description given is based.

^{page 273 note 2} Hagen, W., ‘Kaiserzeitliche Gagatarbeiten aus dem rheinischen Germanien’, Bonner Jahrbiicher cxlii (1937), 140 and pl. xl, no. J9.Google Scholar

^{page 273 note 3} Ibid., 139-40, pl. xxxvii, 1, nos. J7 (Speyer) and J8 (Trier).

^{page 274 note 1} Surrey Arch. Coll. xxxvii (1926), 144–63Google Scholar; xxxviii (1930), 1-17 and 132-48.

^{page 274 note 2} ‘The Roman “Chimney-pots” from Ashtead and parallel examples from other sites’, S.A.C xlii (1934), 61–6Google Scholar.

^{page 274 note 3} Britannia iii (1972), 146–7 and fig. 20.Google Scholar

^{page 274 note 4} The two from Mr. Colville's collection are previously unpublished. The two presented to the British Museum in 1921 are in the Department of Prehistoric and Romano-British Antiquities, where they are numbered 1921, 6-28, 1, and 1921, 6-28, 2. The latter two were presented by our Fellow Louis C. G. Clarke, as a mark of recognition on the retirement of our former President, Sir Hercules Read. They are published in Anon, (the Friends of Sir Hercules Read), Charles Hercules Read. A tribute on his retirementfrom the British Museum and a record of the chief additions to the Department of British and Mediaeval Antiquities and Ethnography during his Keepership, 1896-1921 (London, 1921), pl. XXXIIGoogle Scholar; and in Smith, R. A., A Guide to the Antiquities of the Early Iron Age in the Department of British and Mediaeval Antiquities (British Museum, 1925), p. 84, pl. VIIGoogle Scholar.

^{page 275 note 1} A brief note on recent archaeological work by Professor Lortkipanidze himself is to be found in Gorbunova, K. S., ‘Archaeological Investigations on the Northern Shore of the Black Sea in the Territory of the Soviet Union, 1965-70’, in Archaeological Reports for 1971-72, No. 18, 1972, p. 58 issued with Journal of Hellenic Studies xcii (1972)Google Scholar.

^{page 275 note 2} MacCormick, A. G., Trans. Thoroton Soc. of Notts, lxii (1968), 14–31.Google Scholar

^{page 275 note 3} Cowen, J. D., Proc. Prekist. Soc. xxxiii (1967), 44. 4, nos. 192 and 193.Google Scholar

^{page 275 note 4} Op. cit., note 2, pp. 18-19.

^{page 276 note 1} Curie, J., A Roman Frontier Post and its People, (1911), p. 294Google Scholar

^{page 276 note 2} Piggott, Stuart, Proc. Prehist. Soc. xv (1949), 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 276 note 3} Brewster, T. C. M., Antiquity xlv (1971), 289–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 276 note 4} The wood identification was undertaken in A. M. Laboratory by Mr. G. Morgan. He was also responsible for the greater part of the conservation.

^{page 276 note 5} Mr. Anstee made a detailed examination of the wheel soon after it was received by A.M. Laboratory and we are indebted to him for his various observations.

^{page 277 note 1} Warburton, Eliot, Memoirs and Correspondence of Prince Rupert and the Cavaliers (1849), ii, p. 332.Google Scholar

^{page 278 note 1} In a letter to Lowther dated 13th September 1962.

^{page 278 note 2} Arch. Journ. cxxix (1969), 197 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 279 note 1} Guide to the Antiquities of Roman Britain (2nd edn. 1958)Google Scholar, fig. 5, no. 6. Acc. no. 1907, 10-24, 3.

^{page 279 note 2} Archaeologia, xxvi (1836), 466–7Google Scholar.

^{page 279 note 3} Norfolk Arch, v (1859), 271–6Google Scholar; V.C.H. Norfolk, 1, p. 292, fig. 10.

^{page 279 note 4} Maiuri, A., La Casa del Mendandro e il suo Tesora di Argenteria (Rome, 1932), p. 350, no. 15, fig. 135-6, pls. XLVII-XLVIII.Google ScholarMaiuri, A., Ori e Argenti dell’ Italia Antica (Torino, 1961), p. 198, no. 665, pl. LXXII.Google ScholarStrong, D., Greek and Roman Gold and Silver Plate (London, 1966), p. 158, pl. 37AGoogle Scholar.

^{page 280 note 1} Petrie, Flinders, Objects of Daily Use (London, 1927), p. 32, pl. XXIXGoogle Scholar.

^{page 280 note 2} Disc mirror from Cumae now in Mus. Arch. Naz., Naples, found in a toilet box; rectangular mirror 54228, Reserve Colin. R.G. Mus., Cologne, from Cologne (had fragments of wood adhering to back with traces of fabric on edge and reflecting side); rectangular mirror CC147, frag. 3, Rijks-museum G.M. Kam, Nijmegen, with wooden backing for frame still in situ.

^{page 280 note 3} Down, A. and Rule, M., Chichester Excavations i (1971), grave 60, obj. LGoogle Scholar.

^{page 280 note 4} Eastern Daily Press 26. 7. 1950Google Scholar; Arch. News Letter iii (1950), 70Google Scholar; J.R.S. xli (1951), 136Google Scholar.

^{page 281 note 1} Akerman, J. Y., Remains of Pagan Saxondom (1855), pl. XXXVIGoogle Scholar; Archaeologia, xxxv (1855), pl. xi, 2Google Scholar.

^{page 281 note 2} Bohner, K., Die fränkischen Altertiimer des trierer Landes (1958), pp. 214 ff.Google Scholar; Hawkes, S. Chadwick, ‘The Dating and Social Significance of the Burials in the Polhill Cemetery’, Excavations in West Kent 1960-70, ed. Philp, B., 1973, p. 199Google Scholar.

^{page 281 note 3} Finglesham, Kent, grave 203; unpublished.

^{page 283 note 1} With hump-backed combs in Burwell, Cambs., graves 76 and 83: Lethbridge, T. C., Recent Excavations in Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries in Cambridgeshire and Suffolk (Cambridge Antiq. Soc. 4to publ., N.S., iii, 1931), pp. 61 ff., figs. 31-3.Google Scholar With thread boxes in Drive, Marina, Dunstable, Beds., grave E.2: Beds. Arch. Journ. i (1962), 31, fig. 4, 5Google Scholar; Polhill, Kent, grave 43 and Finglesham, Kent, grave 8 (dated c. 675): Hawkes, op. cit., 1973 pp. 196–8.

^{page 283 note 2} ‘An Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Holborough, Kent’, Arch. Cant, lxx (1956), 92 fGoogle Scholar.

^{page 283 note 3} Hurd, H., Some Notes on Recent Archaeological Discoveries at Broadstairs (1913), pp. 18 ff., figs. 11-12Google Scholar; Rigold, S., ‘The Two Primary Series of Sceattas’, British Numismatic Journal, xxx, 46Google Scholar.

^{page 283 note 4} ‘Two Bronze Spiral-headed Pins’, Excavations at Skakenoak III (Brodribb, A. C. C. et al., 1972), pp. 84 f., figs. 34-5Google Scholar.

^{page 283 note 5} Leeds, E. T., Antiq. Journ. xiii (1933), 249Google Scholar; Donovan, H. E. and Dunning, G. C., ‘Iron Age Pottery and Saxon Burials at Foxcote Manor, Andoversford, Gloucestershire’, Trans. Bristol and Glos. Arch. Soc. lviii (1936), 167 ff., figs. 9, 11Google Scholar.

^{page 283 note 6} Hollingsworth, E. J. and O'Reilly, M. M., The Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Girton College, Cambridge (1925), Table F, grave 25, pi. IV, ibGoogle Scholar.

^{page 283 note 7} The two pins from Shakenoak come from sectors of Ditch F which have a predominantly seventh-century infilling: A. C. C. Brodribb et al., op. cit. (1972), pp. 26 ff, figs. 9, and 31, nos, 156-7. The pins from Broadwell, Stow-on-the-Wold, and Bourton-on-the-Water, Glos., grave 7, come from small groups of graves which can be dated to the latter part of the seventh century by their diagnostically late hump-backed knives: Donovan and Dunning, op. cit. (1936), fig. 10; O'Neil, H. E., ‘Saxon Burials in the Fosse Way at Bourton-on-the-Water, Glos.’, Proceedings of the Cotteswold Naturalists’ Field Club, xxxiii (1960-1961), pp. 166–9.Google Scholar The pin from Winkelbury Hill, Wilts., came from grave 2 in yet another such late Anglo-Saxon cemetery: Rivers, Pitt, Excavations in Cranborne Chase, ii (1888), p. 266, pl. CL, no. 30.Google Scholar The pair of pins from the unpublished Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Worthy Park, Kingsworthy, Hampshire, came from the grave 62, which is dated stratigraphically to some time in the seventh century.

^{page 283 note 8} Though the spiral-headed pin from Bidford-on-Avon is unfortunately not mentioned in the published inventory of the Anglo-Saxon graves, Mrs. Pretty associates it with the single union pin, with garnet-set head, from grave 96. If she has not simply been misled by the fact that the two pins are figured together in Archaeologia, lxxiii (1923), fig. 7,Google Scholar but has independent information that authenticates the grave association, then here is a further case of a spiral-headed pin worn as part of a linked set, and indeed as a replacement for the lost twin to the garnet-set pin. Her dating of this to the sixth century is of course incorrect. The late seventh century dating of the linked pins is now well established: Hyslop, Miranda, ‘Two Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries at Chamberlains Barn, Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire’, Arch. Journ. cxx (1963), 198Google Scholar; Meaney, Audrey L. and Hawkes, Sonia Chadwick, Two Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries at Winnall (Society for Medieval Archaeology, Monograph Series, no. 4, 1970), pp. 36 f. and 47 ffGoogle Scholar.

^{page 283 note 1} The former from my own excavation, the latter from that of Professor B. W. Cunliffe.

^{page 283 note 2} Hyslop, op. cit. (1963), pp. 189 ff.

^{page 283 note 1} Wilde, W., A Descriptive Catalogue of the Antiquities in the Museum of the Royal Irish Academy (1857), p. 559, fig. 453Google Scholar; Armstrong, E. C. R., ‘Irish Pins of the Christian Period’, Archaeologia, lxxii (1922), p. 82Google Scholar; Smith, R. A., A Guide to the Anglo-Saxon and Foreign Teutonic Antiquities (British Museum, 1923), p. 137, fig. 183, dGoogle Scholar; Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland, xc (1960), p. 29, fig. 13 on p. 21Google Scholar.

^{page 283 note 2} By Mrs. Judy Startin, Oxford University Institute of Archaeology.

^{page 286 note 1} The so-called ‘Kennard Brooch’ in the Fitzwilliam Museum at Cambridge: Kendrick, T. D., ‘Style in Early Anglo-Saxon Ornament’, IPEK, ix (1934), pl. XXVIII, 11Google Scholar; Anglo-Saxon Art to A.D. 900 (1938), fig. 19Google Scholar.

^{page 286 note 2} Smith, op. cit. (1923), fig. 6; Aberg, N., The Anglo-Saxons in England (1926), fig. 311, 1Google Scholar; Kendrick, op. cit. (1938), pl. XXXVII, 4.

^{page 286 note 3} Proc. Soc. Antiq., 2 ser., xiv (1893), 314Google Scholar; Aberg, op. cit. (1926), fig. 222; Kendrick, op. cit. (1934), pl. XXVIII, 12, showing the cleaned back with engraving.

^{page 286 note 4} Meaney and Hawkes, op. cit. (1970), p. 42.

^{page 286 note 5} Proc. Soc. Antiq., 1 ser., iv (1857), 93Google Scholar with fig.

^{page 286 note 6} Smith, op. cit. (1923), fig. 42.

^{page 286 note 7} Lethbridge, T. C., ‘Anglo-Saxon Cambridgeshire’, V.C.H. i (1938), pp. 312 fGoogle Scholar.

^{page 286 note 8} Aberg, op. cit. (1926), fig. 287; Meaney and Hawkes, op. cit. (1970), pl. iii, A.

^{page 287 note 1} Evison, V. I., ‘A Viking Grave at Sonning, Berks.’, Antiq. Journ. xlix (1969), 340.Google Scholar

^{page 287 note 2} Shetelig, H., Viking Antiquities (1940), pp. 37–9.Google Scholar

^{page 287 note 3} Antiq. Journ. xxx (1950), 75.Google Scholar

^{page 287 note 4} Wilson, D. M., Anglo-Saxon Ornamental Metalwork (1964), pp. 144–5.Google Scholar

^{page 287 note 5} Berks. Arch. J. lxi (1963-1964), 28–36.Google Scholar

^{page 288 note 1} I am grateful to my colleague, Mr. Brian McWilliams, Natural History Dept., Norwich Museums, for identifying the ivory.

^{page 288 note 2} I am grateful to Messrs. P. A. Faulkner and A. B. Whittingham for this information.

^{page 288 note 3} I am grateful to Mr. John Beckwith, Victoria & Albert Museum for permission to quote from his forthcoming article and to my colleague, Mr. W. F. Milligan for the drawings.

^{page 288 note 4} Beckwith, John, The Adoration of the Magi in Whalebone, Victoria & Albert Museum, 1966Google Scholar; idem, Ivory Carvings in Early Medieval England, London, 1972, cat. no. 63Google Scholar.

^{page 288 note 5} Beckwith, 1972, passim.

^{page 288 note 6} Beckwith, 1972, cat. no. 54; for the door-knocker, ibid., fig. 154.

^{page 289 note 1} Beckwith, 1972, pp. 77 ff.

^{page 289 note 2} Cf. Gourvest, J., ‘Éléments pour servir à l'étude de la céramique médiévale du Midi de la France’, Cahiers Ligures de Préstoire et d'Archéologie x (1961), 150–60Google Scholar and Gagnière, S., ‘Les sépultures à inhumation du III^e au XIII^e siècle de notre ère dans la Basse Vallée du Rhône’, Cahiers Rhodaniens, xii (1965), 85–101Google Scholar.