Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:12:14.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Excavations at South Cadbury Castle, 1967: A Summary Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

Extract

The situation, character, and antiquarian history of South Cadbury Castle, Somerset, have already been described (Alcock (1967a); (1967b)). A reconnaissance excavation in 1966 hinted that occupation of the hilltop had begun in the Early Neolithic, and after a hiatus had been resumed sometime in the Late Bronze Age. It demonstrated that from early in the pre-Roman Iron Age there was a rich and intensive occupation, during which the defences were probably built. This appeared to have been ended by a sack at the hands of the Roman invaders c. A.D. 45. Late Roman pottery, metalwork, and coins showed that activity was renewed in the third-fourth centuries A.D. Imported pottery of well-known forms proved that the site was reused in the fifth—sixth centuries. Finally, it was refortified with a mortared stone wall as a Late Saxon burh. The reconnaissance also showed that on top of the hill (fig. 1, c) rock-cut pits and post-holes were readily discernible under the turf; that on the slopes within the defences (fig. 1, B) traces of buildings of various dates had survived many centuries of ploughing; and that in the rear of the inner rampart (fig. 1, A), a great depth of hill-wash and plough-soil overlay stratified levels of the Iron Age.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, M. J. 1963. ‘Magnetic location’ in Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (ed.), Science in Archaeology, pp. 555–68.Google Scholar
Alcock, L. 1967 a.By South Cadbury is that Camelot’, Antiquity, xli, 50–3.Google Scholar
Alcock, L. 1967 b.A reconnaissance excavation at South Cadbury Castle, Somerset, 1966’, Antiquaries Journ. xlvii, 70–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allcroft, A. H. 1908. Earthwork of England.Google Scholar
Clapham, A. W. 1930. English Romanesque architecture before the Conquest (Oxford).Google Scholar
Colani, C. 1966. ‘A new type of locating device’, Archaeometry, ix, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, P. 1898. Itinera hierosolymitana saeculi iiii–viii (= Corpus scriptorum ecclesiasticarum latinarum, xxxviiii) (Vienna).Google Scholar
Howell, M. 1966. ‘A soil conductivity meter’, Archaeometry, ix, 20–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krautheimer, R. 1965. Early Christian and Byzantine architecture.Google Scholar
Mortimer, J. R. 1905. Forty years' researches in British and Saxon burial mounds of East Yorkshire.Google Scholar
Puig I Cadafalch, J. 1961. L'art wisigothique et ses survivances.Google Scholar
von Uslar, R. 1964. Studien zu frühgeschichtlichen Befestigungen zwischen Nordsee und Alpen (Köln).Google Scholar
Williams-Freeman, J. P. 1915. An introduction to field archaeology.Google Scholar