No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Excavation of the Roman Earthwork at Winterslow, Wilts
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 November 2011
Extract
Originally thought to be a Neolithic long barrow, this site was proved by excavation to be the downhill half of a circular Roman earthwork, possibly an amphitheatre. It was excavated by the writer, assisted by her husband, Major H. L. Vatcher, on behalf of the Ministry of Works from April to July 1959.
Ploughing over the area as a whole for many years had considerably blurred the outlines of the earthwork, almost levelling the uphill half of the circle which was visible only at certain times and in certain lights, and had caused a great deal of hill-wash to accumulate in the hollow central part, while the bank of the excavated half had also been considerably spread and reduced in height.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1963
References
page 197 note 1 The writer wishes to thank Mr. F. K. Annable and Mr. Graham Webster for reports on the Roman pottery and iron spike. Thanks are due to the Ministry of Public Building and Works for a grant towards the cost of publication.
page 207 note 1 Excavations, vol. i, p. 13, pi. 11 and iv.
page 207 note 2 Country Gentlemen's Estate Magazine, lxi (Oct. 1961), 430Google Scholar.
page 207 note 3 Allcroft, The Circle and The Cross (1927), 172–214.
page 207 note 4 Proc. Som. Arch., & Nat. Hist. Soc. lv (1909), 118–37Google Scholar.
page 208 note 1 Excavations, vol. i, 23–24, pi. III.
page 208 note 2 Arch. Journ. xxxi (1874), 319–26.
page 208 note 3 Archaeologia, xxi (1827), 40Google Scholar; Arch. Journ. xxxi (1874), 320Google Scholar.
page 208 note 4 Archaeologia, lix (1904), 104–5Google Scholar, pl. 10.
page 208 note 5 Excavations at Wroxeter (1914), 20–21, pl. xxix.
page 208 note 6 Oxoniensia, xiv (1949), 1–45.
page 208 note 7 Journ. of Soil Science, xiii (1962), no. 2, 254–8Google Scholar
page 208 note 8 The term ‘clay’ has been used as being descriptive of consistency, but chemical analysis has shown that ‘chalk silt’ is a more correct term. Dr. Forbes of the Sedgewick Museum, has suggested that the origin of the bank material might be Combe Rock in some nearby valley.
page 209 note 1 P.P.S. xxv (1959). 40Google Scholar.
page 209 note 2 P.P.S. xxvi (1960), 228Google Scholar; fig. 21, no. P22.
page 210 note 1 P.P.S. xx (1954), pt. 2, 225Google Scholar, fig. 6, no. 28.
page 210 note 2 P.P.S. xxvii (1961), 175Google Scholar, fig. 1.
page 210 note 3 P.P.S. xxvii (1961), 166Google Scholar, fig. 6.
page 211 note 1 P.P.S. xxiii (1957), 45–6Google Scholar, fig. 3, no. 4.
page 211 note 2 Antlq. Journ. ii (1922), 222–36Google Scholar, figs. 2 and 3.
page 211 note 3 P.P.S. xxvi (1960), 278–83Google Scholar, fig. 7, nos. P6 and P7.
page 211 note 4 W.A.M. lviii (1962), 128Google Scholar, fig. 11, no. 18.
page 213 note 1 Saalburg, L. Jacobi, Das Römerkastell Saalburg (1897), Taf. xxxviii, no. 10; Unterboebingen, Der Obergermanisch-Raetische Limes, Taf. 2, fig. 2c; Pfünz, O-R.L. 14, Taf. xv, no. 34, etc.
page 213 note 2 Newstead, Curie, J., A Roman Frontier Post and its People (1911)Google Scholar, pi. lviii, nos. 6 and 11; Urspring, O-R.L., Taf. iv, no. 14; Hofheim, , Annalen des Vereins für Nassauische Altertumskunde und Geschichtsforschung (1912)Google Scholar, Taf. xvii, nos. 69–77, etc.
page 213 note 3 Cleere, , ‘Roman Domestic Ironwork, as illustrated by the Brading, Isle of Wight, Villa’, Bull, of the Inst. of Arch., London, i (1958), 67Google Scholar, and fig. 10 c–h.
page 213 note 4 Ashcroft, , ‘Report on the Roman Villa at Engleton, near Brewood’, Staffs. Record Soc. (1938), pl. xviii, no. 14Google Scholar.
page 213 note 5 Perkins, Ward, ‘The Roman Villa at Lockleys, Welwyn’, Antiq. Journ. xviii (1938), fig. 3, no. 5Google Scholar.
page 213 note 6 Verulamium, A Belgic and Two Roman Cities (1936), 218, pl. LXIV, no. 1, where it appears erroneously described as ‘part of a pilum’. From the photograph it seems that it is complete with its point and had it been a pilum it would have been at least another 10 inches longer and the soft iron shank is unlikely to have survived in this excellent state.