^{page 188 note 1} No grave-goods have apparently survived from the finds at Holkham (TF 877450). The existence of Stukeley's drawing has been noted by several writers: Way, Albert, Catalogue of Antiquities … in the possession of the Society of Antiquaries of London (1847), p. 20Google Scholar; V.C.H. Norfolk, i, 337Google Scholar; Norfolk Archaeology, xxvii (1939), 222Google Scholar; and Meaney, A., A Gazetteer of Early Anglo-Saxon Burial Sites (1964), p. 175.Google Scholar

^{page 188 note 2} Minutes-books of the Society of Antiquaries of London, i, 68Google Scholar. Gough, quoting from the Minutes (W. Camden, Britannia, ed. and trans. R. Gough (1789), ii, 113) makes several alterations: notably, ‘many corpses’ become ‘several’, and Gough gives the date of discovery as 1721, whereas the Minutes merely say ‘lately’.

^{page 188 note 3} Åberg, Nils, The Anglo-Saxons in England (1926), pp. 39–42Google Scholar.

^{page 188 note 4} Brown, G. Baldwin, The Arts in Early England (1915), iii, pl. XLIII, 2.Google Scholar

^{page 188 note 5} Leeds, E. T., A Corpus of Early Anglo-Saxon Great Square-Headed Brooches (1949), pp. 34–45.Google Scholar

^{page 188 note 6} Ibid. no. 41.

^{page 188 note 7} Ibid. no. 45.

^{page 189 note 1} Ibid. no. 55.

^{page 189 note 2} Ibid. no. 51.

^{page 190 note 1} Leeds, op. cit. pp. 82–9.

^{page 190 note 2} Ibid. no. 138.

^{page 190 note 3} Ibid. no. 49.

^{page 190 note 4} Åberg, op. cit. fig. 86.

^{page 190 note 5} Leeds, op. cit. no. 131.

^{page 190 note 6} Ibid. no. 128.

^{page 190 note 7} Ibid. no. 127.

^{page 190 note 8} Ibid. pp. 111–13.

^{page 190 note 9} Ibid. pp. 30–1.

^{page 191 note 1} This total includes several examples additional to those listed by Leeds.

^{page 191 note 2} Ashmolean Museum: reg. no. 1909, 477.

^{page 191 note 3} For a discussion in this light of the later cruciforms, see the late Leeds, E. T. and Pocock, M., ‘A survey of the Anglo-Saxon cruciform brooches of florid type’, Medieval Archaeology, xv (1971), forthcoming.Google Scholar