Article contents
The Dover rune brooch
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 November 2011
Abstract
- Type
- Notes
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1964
References
page 242 note 1 Supervised by the author. The processes of cleaning, preservation and drawing of the objects have been delayed, but when this work is completed it will be possible to publish the report.
page 243 note 1 Stephens, G., Old Northern Runic Monuments, iv (1901), pp. 55–57Google Scholar; Victoria County History, Kent, i, p. 340; Archiv. Stud. neuren Sprachen, clxiv (1933), pp. 250–2; R. Jessup, Anglo-Saxon Jewellery (1950), p. 111, pl. xix, 6.
page 243 note 2 Bruce-Mitford, R. L. S., ‘Late Saxon Disc Brooches’, Dark Age Britain, ed. Harden, D. B., (1956), pp. 193–8Google Scholar, fig. 38, pls. xxviii and xxix A. R. I. Page, ‘The Inscriptions’, in D. M. Wilson, Anglo-Saxon ornamental metalwork, 700–1100 (1964), pp. 88–89, No. 83, fig. 34.
page 243 note 3 Kuhn, H., Die germanischen Bügelfibeln der Völkerwanderungszeit in der Rheinprovinz (1940), p. 198Google Scholar, Taf. 83. 20, 14; cf. also Taf. 82. 18, 13 and 19, 10.
page 243 note 4 Kendrick, T. D., ‘Polychrome Jewellery in Kent’, Antiquity, vii, 429 ff.Google Scholar, pl. 1, 1–3, 8–10.
page 243 note 5 Leeds, E. T., Early Anglo-Saxon Art and Archaeology (1936), p. 117Google Scholar, pl. xxxiii, 1–3.
page 243 note 6 Clarke, R. Rainbird, East Anglia (1960), p. 137Google Scholar, fig. 43; Wrenn, C. L., ‘Saxons and Celts in South-west Britain’, Trans. Hon. Soc. of Cymmrodorion (1959), pp. 40–41Google Scholar; Wrenn, C. L. ‘Magic in an Anglo-Saxon Cemetery’, English and Medieval Studies presented to J. R. R. Tolkien (1962), ed. Davis, N. and Wrenn, C. L., pp. 306–20.Google Scholar
page 243 note 7 The Shell Magazine, Sept. 1962, pp. 266–8; Illustrated London News (1963), no. 6474, vol. ccxliii, pp. 320–1.
page 244 note 1 Brown, G. Baldwin, The Arts in Early England, vol. iv, pl. cxlvi, 4.Google Scholar
page 244 note 2 Cf. quatrefoil cloisons on a fifth-century Frankish buckle found in Kent, T. D. Kendrick, op. cit., fig. 7.
page 244 note 3 Arntz, H. und Zeiss, H., Die einheimischen Runendenkmäler des Festlandes (1939), pp. 120–33Google Scholar, Taf. vi, 7, xxxix, 7.
page 244 note 4 Ibid., pp. 307–19, Taf. xxiii; xli, 26.
page 244 note 5 Ibid., pp. 167–72, Taf. ix; Werner, J., Das alamannische Gräberfeld von Bülach (1953), pp. 10–11Google Scholar, 123, fig. 249, pl. 1, 10, 10 a.
page 244 note 6 Arntz und Zeiss, op. cit., pp. 232–5, Taf. xiv.
page 244 note 7 Ibid., pp. 344–50, Taf. xxviii.
page 244 note 8 Elliott, R. W. V., Runes (1959), p. 79, pl. iii, fig. 7Google Scholar. D. M. Wilson, op. cit., No. 36.
page 244 note 9 Bruce-Dickins, , ‘The Inscriptions upon the Coffin’, The Relics of St. Cuthbert (1956), ed. Battiscombe, C. F., pp. 305–7.Google Scholar
page 245 note 1 Ibid., p. 306.
page 245 note 2 Arntz und Zeiss, op. cit., p. 159.
page 245 note 3 Elliott, op. cit., p. 24.
page 245 note 4 According to my reading, Antiq. Journ. xl (1960), 243–4.
page 245 note 5 Kendrick, op. cit., pl. 1, 9.
page 245 note 6 Cf. Elliott, op. cit., p. 34: ‘We may assume then that the Anglo-Saxon settlers brought with them from the Continent a modified version of the older Germanic fuþark.’
page 245 note 7 Urn No. 60/201, The Shell Magazine, Sept. 1962, pp. 266–7; Illustrated London News (1963), no. 6474, vol. ccxliii, pp. 320–1.
- 6
- Cited by