Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:43:36.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Distribution of Tournai Fonts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2011

C. S. Drake
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In The Society's Journal of 1944, G. C. Dunning F.S.A. published a brief article, with a map, entitled ‘The distribution of black Tournai Fonts’. There has been no other view published since that occasion (at least not in Britain) and indeed J. R. Blatchly and Birkin Haward (1983), writing some forty years later on the font in St Peter's church, Ipswich, reproduced Dunning's map. The body of knowledge of Tournai fonts has advanced considerably since the war and this article offers a more up to date picture. As discoveries of fragments of fonts continue to be made, it does not claim to be exhaustive, though it is most unlikely that there are any more complete bowls to be found (see map fig. 1). In fact further research may show that the list published here may need to be reduced by three or four examples, which are discussed below.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 73 , September 1993 , pp. 11 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J.R. 1894. ‘Fonts of the Winchester type’, J. Brit. Archaeol. Assoc, 50, 17–27Google Scholar
Allen, J.R., 1898. ‘The font at Zedelghem, near Bruges’, The Reliquary and Illustrated Archaelogist, new ser. 4, 259–68Google Scholar
Blatchly, J. and Ha Ward, B. 1983. The Toumai Font in St Peter, Ipswich,Ipswich Historic Churches TrustGoogle Scholar
Bond, F. 1985. Fonts and Font-covers, 2nd edition, LondonGoogle Scholar
Cahn, W. 1977. ‘Romanesque sculpture in American collections. XVI. The Academy of the New Church, Bryn Athyn, Pa.’ Gesta, 16, pt. 2. 69–70Google Scholar
Cautley, H.M. 1954. Suffolk Churches and their Treasures, 3rd edition, IpswichGoogle Scholar
Cloquet, L. 1895. ‘Fonts de baptême romans de Tournai’, Revue de I'Art Chrétien, 308–20Google Scholar
Cox, J.C. and Harvey, A. 1907. English Church Furniture, LondonGoogle Scholar
Dunning, G.C. 1944. ‘The distribution of black Tournai fonts’, Antiq.J., 24, 66–8Google Scholar
Eden, C.H. 1909. Black Toumai Fonts in England, LondonGoogle Scholar
Enlart, C. 1895. Monuments religieux romans et de transition de la région Picarde, Amiens and ParisGoogle Scholar
Enlart, C., 1902. Manuel d'Archéologie Française: I. Architecture Religieuse, ParisGoogle Scholar
Fowler, J.T. 1923. ‘Note on Boulge font’, Antiq.J., 3, 154–5Google Scholar
Kitchin, G.W. 1894. ‘The history of the cathedral font, Winchester’ J. Brit. Archaeol. Assoc, 50, 6–16Google Scholar
Nesfield, W.E. 1862. Specimens of Medieval Architecture chiefly selected from examples of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries in Spain and France, LondonGoogle Scholar
Pevsner, N., revised by Radcliffe, E. 1974. The Buildings of England. Suffolk, 2nd edition, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
Pudelko, G. 1932. Romanische Taufsteine, Berlin Lankowitz,Google Scholar
RCHM. 1939. An Inventory of the Historical Monuments in the City of Oxford, LondonGoogle Scholar
Rolland, P. 1924. ‘L'expansion tournaisienne aux XI et XII siècles: art et commerce de la pierre’, Annales de I'Académie Royale d'Archeologie de Bruxelles, 72, 175–219Google Scholar
Rolland, P., 1925. ‘Les fonts romans tournaisiens’, La Revue de I'Art, 26, 41–50Google Scholar
Sherwood, J. and Pesvner, N. 1974. The Buildings of England. Oxfordshire, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
Soil De Moriamé, E.J. 1912. ‘Les anciennes industries d'art tournaisiennes à l'exposition de 1911’, Annales de la Société Historique et Archéologique de Tournai, 15Google Scholar
Trouvelot, J. 1936. ‘Remarques sur la technique des sculpteurs du Moyen-Age’ Bulletin Monumental, 95, 103–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar