No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 November 2011
A further selection of twenty-eight fragments of samian moulds, originally found by Plicque at Lezoux and formerly belonging to the Oswald–Plicque Collection, is discussed in this paper; like their predecessors, all these fragments are now preserved in the Birley Collection, at the Department of Archaeology, University of Durham.
page 60 note 2 I am again greatly indebted to Professor Eric Birley, F.S.A., for allowing me to study and publish these fragments.
page 60 note 3 Stanfield, J. A. and Simpson, Grace, Central Gaulish Potters, London, 1958, fig. 30, p. 196Google Scholar. (Hereafter abbreviated to CGP.)
page 60 note 4 D. followed by a number = Déchelette, J., Les Vases céramiques ernés de la Gaule romaine, Paris, 1904Google Scholar, ii; O. followed by a number = Oswald, F., Index of Figure-types on Terra Sigillata (Samian Ware), Liverpool, 1936–1937, i–ivGoogle Scholar.
page 60 note 5 CGP.pl. 104/4.
page 60 note 6 CGP, pl. 104/2.
page 60 note 7 CGP, pl. 104/5.
page 60 note 8 CGP, pl. 105/12.
page 60 note 9 CGP, pl. 108/36.
page 60 note 10 Karnitsch, P., Die Reliefsigillata von Ovilava (Wels, Oberösterreich), Linz, 1959, Taf. 46/3Google Scholar. (Hereafter abbreviated to Wels)
page 60 note 11 CGP, pl. 104/4.
page 60 note 12 F. Oswald, Index, 22.
page 60 note 13 CGP, pl. 105/15.
page 60 note 14 Wels, Taf. 48/1.
page 60 note 15 CGP, pl. 123/39.
page 60 note 16 CGP, pl. 123/35.
page 60 note 17 CGP, pl. 123/37.
page 60 note 18 e.g. CGP, pl. 123/35.
page 62 note 1 CGP, pl. 119/7.
page 62 note 2 Wels, Taf. 54/2.
page 62 note 3 CW 2, lxv (1965), 96Google Scholar, and fig. 3, no. 16.
page 62 note 4 CGP, fig. 36, p. 221.
page 62 note 5 CGP, pl. 125/4.
page 62 note 6 CGP, pl. 125/2.
page 62 note 7 CGP, pl. 126/14.
page 62 note 8 CGP, fig. 27, p. 184.
page 62 note 9 CGP, pl. 98/8.
page 62 note 10 CGP, pl. 99/20.
page 62 note 11 CGP, pl. 100/24.
page 63 note 1 CGP, fig. 30, p. 196.
page 63 note 2 CGP, 194.
page 63 note 3 CGP, pl. 104/4.
page 63 note 4 CGP, fig. 35, p. 216.
page 63 note 5 CGP, pl. 122/24.
page 63 note 6 CGP, pl. 121/13.
page 63 note 7 CGP, fig. 13, p. 55.
page 63 note 8 Wels, Taf. 33/4.
page 63 note 9 CGP, pl. 61/686.
page 63 note 10 F. Oswald, Index, 22.
page 63 note 11 CGP, pl. 58/657.
page 63 note 12 CGP, pl. 58/660.
page 63 note 13 CGP, fig. 47, p. 267.
page 63 note 14 Wels, Taf. 66/1 and 2.
page 63 note 15 CGP, pl. 160/35.
page 63 note 16 CGP, pl. 161/47.
page 65 note 1 CGP, fig. 30, p. 196.
page 65 note 2 CGP, pl. 105/17.
page 65 note 3 CGP.pl. 104/4.
page 65 note 4 CGP, pl. 104/8.
page 65 note 5 CGP, pl. 105/12.
page 65 note 6 Wels, Taf. 46/1.
page 65 note 7 CGP.pl. 107/31.
page 65 note 8 CGP, pl. 105/15.
page 65 note 9 CGP, pl. 59/672.
page 65 note 10 CGP, pl. 58/660.
page 65 note 11 Bushe-Fox, J. P., Fourth Report on the Excavations of the Roman Fort at Richborough, Kent, London, 1949, pl. LXXXII, no. 56Google Scholar.
page 65 note 12 CGP, pl. 120/6.
page 65 note 13 Antiq. Journ., xlii (1962), 31Google Scholar, fig. 1, no. 6.
page 65 note 14 F. Oswald, Index, 102.
page 65 note 15 CGP, pl. 106/22.
page 65 note 16 CGP, pl. 123/35.
page 65 note 17 CGP, pl. 123/41 and 42.
page 65 note 18 CGP, fig. 13, p. 55.
page 65 note 19 CGP, fig. 35, p. 216.
page 65 note 20 CGP, fig. 25, p. 180.
page 65 note 21 CGP, pl. 95/14.
page 66 note 1 CGP, pl. 128/4.
page 66 note 2 CGP, fig. 37, p. 224.
page 66 note 3 CGP, pl. 126/11.
page 66 note 4 CGP, fig. 44, p. 253.
page 66 note 5 F. Oswald, Index, 54.
page 66 note 6 CGP, fig. 13, p. 55.
page 66 note 7 CGP, fig. 12, p. 49.
page 66 note 8 F. Oswald, Index, 145.
page 66 note 9 CGP, pl. 104/4 and 6.
page 66 note 10 CGP, fig. 30, p. 196.
page 66 note 11 CGP, pl. 106/22.
page 66 note 12 CGP, pl. 106/25.
page 66 note 13 CGP, pl. 106/20.
page 66 note 14 Wels, Taf. 52/3.
page 68 note 1 CGP, pl. 52/613.
page 68 note 2 CGP, pl. 54/636.
page 68 note 3 CGP, pl. 55/inv. 57.
page 68 note 4 CGP, 190.
page 68 note 5 Wels, Taf. 44/4.
page 68 note 6 CGP, pl. 101/1.
page 68 note 7 CGP, pl. 53/618.
page 68 note 8 CGP, fig. 12, p. 49.
page 68 note 9 CGP, pl. 55/inv. 50.
page 68 note 10 CGP, pl. 55/646.
page 68 note 11 F. Oswald, Index, 31.
page 68 note 12 CGP, pl. 51/601.
page 68 note 13 F. Oswald, Index, 88.
page 68 note 14 ibid. p. 73.
page 68 note 15 CGP, pl. 159/26.
page 68 note 16 CGP, pl. 158/21 and 163/74.
page 68 note 17 CGP, pl. 163/66 and 70.
page 69 note 1 Arch. Cant., xviii (1889), 1–4Google Scholar.
page 69 note 2 CGP, fig. 30, p. 196.
page 69 note 3 CGP, pl. 54/634.
page 69 note 4 F. Oswald, Index, 57.
page 69 note 5 CGP, fig. 12, p.49.
page 69 note 6 CGP, pl. 51/601.
page 69 note 7 CGP, pl. 54/634.