^{page 35 note 1} Paston Letters, ii, 339. The references throughout are to The Paston Letters 1422-1509 edited by Gairdner, James, 4 vols., Westminster; Constable & Co. Ltd., 1901Google Scholar, reprint Edinburgh; John Grant, 1910. The volume and page are given, NOT the number of the letter.

^{page 35 note 2} Tanner, Bishop, Notitia Monastica, ed. 1744, f. 369.Google Scholar

^{page 35 note 3} P.L. i, 447.

^{page 35 note 4} Ibid, i, 452, 454.

^{page 35 note 5} Ancient Indictments, 128: Norfolk West Flegg.Google Scholar

^{page 35 note 6} B.M. Add. Ch. 14597; P.L. i, 6.

^{page 35 note 7} Sketch of the History of Caister Castle, 1842.Google Scholar

^{page 36 note 1} In Norf. Arch, xxx, pt. 3.

^{page 36 note 2} P.L. iii, 442.

^{page 36 note 3} Simpson, W. Douglas, Arch. Journ. xcix, 110.Google Scholar

^{page 36 note 4} P.L. Intro, cxxxvii, i, 245, 250, 252.

^{page 36 note 5} Ibid. Intro, ccclxxx.

^{page 36 note 6} Rymer, xi, 44; P.L. Intro, cxxxv.

^{page 36 note 7} P.L. i, 43.

^{page 36 note 8} Ibid, i, 187.

^{page 36 note 9} Ibid, i, 486; Archaeologia, xxi, 232-80.

^{page 36 note 10} Ibid, i, 92, n. 3.

^{page 36 note 11} Ibid, i, 427.

^{page 36 note 12} Anstis, , Order of the Garter, i, 141 (London, 1724).Google Scholar

^{page 36 note 13} P.L. i, 447-8.

^{page 37 note 1} Ibid, ii, 350; but see P.L. iii, 92, 119-20.

^{page 37 note 2} Blomefield, , History of Norfolk, xi, 207.Google Scholar

^{page 37 note 3} Brackley's, FriarBook of Arms, c, 1450Google Scholar; Rye Bequest, Norwich Public Library.

^{page 37 note 4} Norf. Arch, xiv, 63–69.

^{page 38 note 1} Brit. Mus. Add. MSS. 39848, folios 71–74. See pi. XVII.

^{page 38 note 1} At least, so it is assumed for convenience in description. The correct orientation is shown on our plan (fig. i).

^{page 42 note 1} The three northmost windows are now built up.

^{page 43 note 1} See Journ. Brit. Archaeol. Assoc., N.S., xl, 188.

^{page 43 note 2} Archaeologia, xxi, 232–80; P.L. i, 480–90.

^{page 43 note 3} B.M. Add. MS. 39848, f. 54.

^{page 43 note 4} Itinerary, ed. Nasmith, , p. 332.Google Scholar

^{page 43 note 5} P.L. iii, 208.

^{page 44 note 1} A good German instance of the same tendency may be seen in the town walls of Budingen.

^{page 44 note 2} See Renard, Edmund, Rheinische Wasserburgen, Bonn, 1922, with bibliography.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 45 note 1} As was the case at Caister: see P.L. ii, 313; iii, 442.

^{page 46 note 1} Lechenich, like Kempen, was built by the prince-archbishops of Cologne, who in the latter part of the fourteenth century carried out extensive castle works for the security of their ecclesiastical domain.

^{page 46 note 2} On this subject see Archaeol. Cambrensis, xcv, 161–3.

^{page 47 note 1} See Schulz, F., Die Hanse und England von Eduards III bis auf Heinrichs VIII Zeit (Abhandlungen zur Verkehrs- und Seegeschichte, vol. v, 1911)Google Scholar, also Darnell, E., Die Blüte-Zeit der deutschen Hanse, 1905–1906, i, 57–76,Google Scholar and ii, 1–53; Kentgen, F., Die Beziehungen der Hanse zur England im letzten Drittel des vierzehnten Jahrhunderts, 1890Google Scholar.

^{page 47 note 2} Rotuli Parliamentarian, v, 424a.

^{page 48 note 1} Dehio, Georg, Geschichte der deutschen Kunst, Abbildungen, Bd. ii, Taf. 412.Google Scholar

^{page 49 note 1} For all this, see Evans, Joan, English Art, 1307–1461, pp. 53–54Google Scholar, 98–99, 142–3.

^{page 48 note 2} The Tattershall building accounts will shortly be published by the Lincoln Record Society.

^{page 48 note 3} Cal. Pat. Rolls, 1429–36, pp. 560, 565–7, 582, 587.

^{page 48 note 4} R.C.H.M., Essex (SE.), p. 167.

^{page 48 note 5} R.C.H.M., Middlesex, p. 86.

^{page 49 note 1} Journ. Brit. Archaeol. Assoc, 3rd ser., vi, 85.

^{page 49 note 2} See Journ. Brit. Archaeol. Assoc, 2nd ser., xli, 8–23, and specially fig. 10.