Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:33:09.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Imperial Bronze Statue at Segontium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 332 note 1 Wheeler, R.E.M., Y Cymmrodor, xxxiii (1923), 54–7Google Scholar, cf. fig. 17; ibid., 67–8 (in my opinion the lower or main filling, including the seam of earthy silt, is all contemporary).

page 332 note 2 Davies, R. W., ‘A Note on Lorictitis, Bonner Jahrb. clxviii (1968), 163–5Google Scholar; Gamer, G., Germania, xlvi (1968), 5366Google Scholar, and id., Kaiserztl. Bronzestatuen aus den Kastellen und Legionslägern am Rhein- u. Donaugrenze des röm. Imp. (Inaugural-Dissertation, 1969—no illus.).

page 332 note 3 Boon, G. C., Arch. Camb. cxix (1970), 31–2, 41–7.Google Scholar

page 332 note 4 Richmond, I. A., Antiq. Journ. xxiv (1944), 79Google Scholar

page 332 note 5 Boube-Piccot, C., Les Bronzes antiques du Maroc (1969), i, 33 ff., 40 ff.Google Scholar

page 332 note 6 Gamer, Germania, loc. cit., Taf. 15, 3 (see also Boon, loc. cit., fig. 11, 3).

page 332 note 7 e.g. Boube-Piccot, op. cit., pls. 38, 54. On the development of the kilt, see Richmond, loc. cit. and the corpus of statues assembled by Vermeule, C. C., Berytus, xiii, xv, and xvi (19591960, 1964, 1966).Google Scholar

page 332 note 8 Gamer, Germania, loc. cit., Taf. 10, 4; Boon, loc. cit., fig. 11, 1; Tudor, D., oltenia Romană (ed. 3, 1968), pp. 300–1, fig. 80.Google Scholar

page 333 note 1 e.g. Boube-Piccot, op. cit., pls. 41, 44.

page 333 note 2 Wheeler, loc. cit., pp. 54–6 (I believe the cement rendering was original and not a secondary covering).

page 333 note 3 Tudor, op. cit., p. 301.

page 333 note 4 Boon, loc. cit., pp. 31–2.

page 333 note 5 R.I.B., i, no. 429. The other material, Wheeler, loc. cit., pp. 68, 80.

page 333 note 6 These are not likely to have been coined after c. 340 when a different type was issued from the mints. Indeed Constantinopolis probably ceased to be issued in 335; but was counterfeited in the period c. 337–40 in Somerset (White Woman's Hole).