Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more: https://www.cambridge.org/universitypress/about-us/news-and-blogs/cambridge-university-press-publishing-update-following-technical-disruption
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 November 2011
This paper is intended to examine in detail certain problems concerning the binding of the Victor Codex (MS. Bonifatianus I)in the Landesbibliothek at Fulda (pl. xxxv). It is hoped to show that the metal mounts of the binding are of Northumbrian manufacture; that, in all probability, the leather binding was executed at the same time and in the same area, and that the binding is of late-seventh or eighth-century date.
page 199 note 1 Munster, S., Cosmographiae universalis (Basileae, 1550), pp. 706–7Google Scholar.
page 199 note 2 For a reasonable complete bibliography of this controversy, see Scherer, C., ‘Die Codices Bonifatiani in der Landesbibliothek zu Fulda’, Festgabezum Bonifatius-Jubiläum 1905 (Fulda, 1905), no. 2, pp. 5 fGoogle Scholar.
page 200 note 1 For a discussion of the palaeography of the manuscript, cf. Lowe, E. A., Codices Latini Antiquiores, viii (Oxford, 1959), 49 (no. 1196)Google Scholar.
page 200 note 2 The full text is printed, with critical apparatus, by Ranke, E., Codex Fuldensis, Novum Testamentum Latine Interprete Hieronymo (Marburgi/Lipsiae, 1868)Google Scholar. For the canon tables cf. McGurk, P., ‘The Canon Tables in the Book of Lindisfarne and in the Codex Fuldensis of St. Victor of Capua’, The Journal of Theological Studies, vi (1955), 192–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page 200 note 3 Scherer, op. cit., p. 7, n. 2, describes the makeup of the gatherings.
page 200 note 4 Ranke, op. cit., pp. viii f.
page 203 note 1 Theele, J., ‘Der Einband des Cod. Bonifat. 1 zu Fulda’, Archiv für Buchbinderei, xxix (1929), 52Google Scholar, described the material as a copper-gold alloy: this is quite clearly incorrect, there are not even any traces of gilding,
page 207 note 1 Op. cit., pp. 51–52.
page 207 note 2 Endres, H., ‘Zum Einband des Victor Codex in der Landesbibliothek zu Fulda’, Archiv für Buchbinderei, xlii (1942), 15–16Google Scholar; see also van Regemorter, B., ‘La reliure des manuscrits de S. Cuthbert et de S. Boniface’, Scriptorium, iii (1949), 49Google Scholar.
page 207 note 3 Idem. ‘Évolution de la technique de la reliure du viiie au xiie siècle’, Scriptorium, ii (1948), 275–85.
page 208 note 1 I owe this information to Dr. F. Pieper of the Landesbibliothek in Fulda.
page 208 note 2 B. van Regemorter, op. cit. (1949), 49, states that the loops indicate that the book belonged to a chained library, saying that this would convince her that the book was bound when it came into the possession of St. Boniface. I must disagree with this assertion as there was normally only one loop, usually of iron, on the top edge of a chained book (for description of normal chaining in medieval libraries see Myres, J. N. L. in Wormald, F. and Wright, C. E., The English Library (London, 1958), p. 236Google Scholar). Secondly, there is no evidence that Anglo-Saxon libraries were chained (in fact there is no evidence that they were chained before the twelfth century); thirdly, the other two Boniface codices are not chained and, fourthly, there is no reason why the loops should not be secondary.
page 210 note 1 Reginaldi monachi dunelmensis libellus de admirandis beati cuthberti virtutibus quoe novellis patratae sunt temporibus (Surtees Society, vol. 1), cap. xci, p. 198.
page 210 note 2 Acta Sanctorum, Martii, iii, 141.
page 210 note 3 These two references are quoted by Brown, G. Baldwin, The Arts in Early England, vi, i (London, 1930), 5 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 210 note 4 Raftery, J., Christian Art in Ancient Ireland, ii (Dublin, 1941), 59 fGoogle Scholar.
page 210 note 5 Cf. ibid., pp. 55 f.
page 210 note 6 Cf. Proc. Soc. Antiq. London, xxxi, 220, figs. 2, 9, 11, &c, for a literary reference to this practice, cf. Eddius Stephanus, Vita Wilfredi, cap. xxxiv.
page 210 note 7 Fulda Landesbibliothek, MS. 8°B.i3. Printed in extended form by Richter, G., ‘Ein Reliquien-verzeichnis der Fuldaer Stiftskirche aus dem XV. Jahrhundert’, Quellen.und Abhandlung zur Geschichte der Abtei und der Diözese Fulda, iv (1907), 63Google Scholar.
page 211 note 1 Adamson, J., ‘An Account of the discovery at Hexham, in the County of Northumberland, of a Brass Vessel containing a Number of Anglo-Saxon Coins called Stycas’, Archaeologia, xxv (1834), pl. 33Google Scholar.
page 211 note 2 Peers, C. and Radford, C. A. R., ‘The Saxon Monastery of Whitby’, Archaeologia, lxxxix (1943), fig. 15, 7Google Scholar.
page 211 note 3 Brøndsted, J., Early English Ornament (London/Copenhagen, 1924)Google Scholar, figs. 72 and 73.
page 211 note 4 Battiscombe, C. F. (ed.), The Relics of St.Cuthbert (Oxford, 1956), pp. 326 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 211 note 5 Jankuhn, H., Haithabu, Eine germanische Stadt der Frühzeit (Neumünster, 1937)Google Scholar, fig. 132. The object is wrongly described (p. 119) as gold: it is actually parcel-gilt silver.
page 211 note 6 British Museum, A Guide to Anglo-Saxon and Foreign Teutonic Antiquities (London, 1923), p. 106Google Scholar, fig. 128.
page 211 note 7 Grierson, P., ‘The Dating of the Sutton Hoo Coins’, Antiquity, xxvi (1952), 83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page 211 note 8 The Sutton Hoo Ship Burial, a provisional guide (London, British Museum, 5th impression 1956), 28, fig. 9Google Scholar.
page 212 note 1 Cf. Peers and Radford, op. cit., fig. 10, 2; pl. xxvi, a and b.
page 212 note 2 Best illustrated by Haseloff, G., ‘Fragments of a Hanging-Bowl from Bekesbourne, Kent, and Some Ornamental Problems’, Medieval Archaeology, ii (1958), pl. 8, jGoogle Scholar.
page 212 note 3 Jankuhn, loc. cit.
page 212 note 4 For example, Zimmermann, E. H., Vorkarolingische Miniaturen (Berlin, 1916), pl. 242Google Scholar.
page 212 note 5 Victoria County History, Cambridgeshire, i, pl. xii, g and i and p. 323.
page 212 note 6 For example, ibid., 323 and pi. xii, h.
page 212 note 7 Roes, A., ‘A Strap-end in the Yorkshire Museum and its Continental Counterparts’, Antiq. Journ., xxxviii (1958), 94–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page 212 note 8 Cf., for example, Peers and Radford, op. cit., p. 52.
page 212 note 9 Ibid. 50 f.
page 212 note 10 Loc. cit.
page 213 note 1 Zimmermann, op. cit, pl. 255 a.
page 213 note 2 Ibid., pl. 202.
page 213 note 3 Haseloff, G., Der Tassilokelch (München 1951)Google Scholar.
page 213 note 4 Van Regemorter, op. cit. (1948), 277 f. Mile van Regemorter will shortly publish an extended account of the occurrence of this particular feature.
page 213 note 5 Cf. Marçais, G. and Poinssot, L., Objets Kairouanais, IXe au XIIIe siècle (Tunis 1948)Google Scholar (notes et documents du direction des antiquityés ct arts, xi, fasc. 1), fig. 2.
page 214 note 1 Battiscombe, op. cit., pp. 356 ff.
page 214 note 2 Loubier, H., Der Bucheinband von seinen Anfängen bis zum Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts (Leipzig 1926)Google Scholar, fig. 65; Scherer, op. cit., fig. 4.
page 214 note 3 The exception is the rosette pattern, which is paralleled in the Book of Kells. Alton, E. H. and Meyer, P., Evangeliorum Quattuor Codex Cennanensis, i (Bernae 1950)Google Scholar, 8V, 9r, etc.
page 214 note 4 One of the few recent attempts to tackle the problem of the chronology of Coptic bookbinding is to be found in Petersen, T. C., ‘Early Islamic Bookbindings and their Coptic Relations’, Ars Orientalis, i (1954), 41 ffGoogle Scholar. Petersen quotes here at least one bookbinding with blind stamps which is earlier than 700.
page 215 note 1 T. J. Brown in Codex Lindisfarnensis, ii and Lausanne 1960), 86.
page 215 note 2 Although we know that they existed, they are portrayed in manuscripts, e.g. Echternach Gospels, fol. 18b; Zimmermann, pl. 255.
page 215 note 3 Walters Art Gallery, The History of Bookbinding, 525–1950 A.D. (Baltimore 1957)Google Scholar, pls. xxxii and xxxiii.
page 215 note 4 I must thank Dr. David Wright for this identification.
page 215 note 5 Lowe, op. cit. i (1934), p. xi; ii (1935), p. viii; Thompson, E. M., An Introduction to Greek and Latin Palaeography (Oxford 1912), 31.Google Scholar
page 216 note 1 Lowe, op. cit. viii, 49 (no. 1196).
page 216 note 2 Quoted by Hobson, G. D., ‘Some Early Bindings and Binder's Tools’, Tie Library, 1938, p. 216Google Scholar.
page 216 note 3 Schnitzler, H., Rheinische Schatzkammer, Tafelband (Düsseldorf 1957)Google Scholar, pl. 100. For a discussion of this class see Walters Art Gallery, op. cit. pp. 1 ff.
page 216 note 4 Op. cit., p. vi.
page 216 note 5 Loc. cit.
page 216 note 6 Lowe, op. cit. viii, 49.
page 217 note 1 Boniface's requests for books are conveniently listed by Greenaway, G. W., Saint Boniface (London, 1955), pp. 64 fGoogle Scholar.
page 217 note 2 Loc. cit.
