^{page 178 note 5} Museum index numbers: bow-brooch, 1.47.1; penannular, 1.47.2.

^{page 179 note 1} Thos. Wright, Essays on Archaeological Subjects, i, 24, figs. 1 and 2. There is no record of any other material from this barrow. The brooches are now in the Ashmolean Museum, with whose permission they are here reproduced.

^{page 180 note 1} The transverse section of the tongue forming the sliding-rings of the Huntow penannulars is itself curved, the concave face being on the inside. In casting the pin element the tongue intended for the sliding ring was probably given some degree of longitudinal curvature, the gap left in the half-formed sliding-ring being just enough to allow it to be placed on the penannular ring.

^{page 180 note 2} Arch. Camb. 1927, 67 ff.

^{page 180 note 3} Op. cit., p. 91.

^{page 180 note 4} Op. cit., p. 92, and Devizes Mus. Cat. pt. ii, p. 126.

^{page 180 note 5} e.g. Fox, op. cit. 74, fig. 5 and 82, fig. 13.

^{page 180 note 6} Antiq. Journ. xxvi, 187 ff.

^{page 180 note 7} e.g. Jacobsthal, Early Celtic Art, pl. 156, no. 303.

^{page 181 note 1} Proc. Hants F.C., xiii, pt. i, 18 and 35.

^{page 181 note 2} Sussex Arch. Coll., lxxx (1939), 230.

^{page 181 note 3} Proc. Prehist. soc., vi (1940), 103, f.n. ii.

^{page 181 note 4} Glastonbury, i, pl. xliv, no. E259.

^{page 181 note 5} The Hod Hill penannulars with zoomorphic terminals resemble that from Maiden Castle illu-strated as number 8 in fig. 86 of the report with the addition of transverse grooves on either side of the ‘pinched’ portion.

^{page 181 note 6} Pič, Le Hradischt de Stradonitz, pl. xxviii, no. 3.

^{page 181 note 7} Maiden Castle, fig. 86, no. 5.

^{page 181 note 8} Devizes Mus. Cat., pt. ii, 121, fig. 8.

^{page 182 note 1} Maiden Castle, fig. 86, no. 8.

^{page 182 note 2} Op. cit., fig. 86, no. 2.

^{page 182 note 3} Proc. S. A. Scot., 1, 28, fig. 23, no. 1.