Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:21:34.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Siting of Metalwork Hoards in the Bronze Age of South-East England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2010

David Yates*
Affiliation:
David Yates, 12 Nepcote, FindonBN14 0SD, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Richard Bradley*
Affiliation:
Richard Bradley, Department of Archaeology, University of Reading, PO Box 227, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AB, UK. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The paper discusses the siting of Middle and Late Bronze Age hoards in south Hampshire, Sussex and parts of Surrey and Kent. It presents the results of fieldwork at the findspots of a hundred metalwork deposits and discusses the most informative ways of studying them on the ground. On the coastal plain the hoards were not far from occupation sites, and can be associated with evidence of burnt mounds and occasionally with field systems. That was less common on the chalk. Throughout the study area these deposits were normally located along watercourses, with a special emphasis on small areas of ground beside, or overlooking springs and confluences. It seems as if the deposition of bronze metalwork was governed by certain conventions. For that reason it may be possible to predict the pattern of future discoveries.

Résumé

Cette communication traite de l’emplacement des trésors datant du milieu et de la fin de l’âge du bronze au sud du Hampshire, au Sussex et dans certaines parties du Surrey et du Kent. Elle présente les résultats du travail sur le terrain aux sites des découvertes d’une centaine de dépôts d’objets en métal et traite des méthodes les plus instructives pour les étudier sur le terrain. Sur la plaine côtière, les trésors n’étaient pas loin des sites d’occupation et peuvent être associés avec les indices de monticules brûlés et parfois avec des systèmes de champs. Ceci était moins commun sur la craie. Dans toute la zone de l’étude, ces dépôts étaient normalement situés le long de cours d’eau, et ce tout particulièrement dans de petites aires de terrain soit à côté soit en surplomb de sources et de confluences. C’est comme si le dépôt d’objets en bronze était gouverné par certaines conventions. C’est pour cette raison qu’il pourrait être possible de prédire le modèle de futures découvertes.

Zusammenfassung

In dieser Abhandlung werden die Fundstellen von Depots der mittleren und späten Bronzezeit in den Grafschaften Südhampshire, Sussex und Teilen von Surrey und Kent diskutiert. Die Resultate der Geländearbeiten bei denen hunderte von Metalldepots aufgezeichnet wurden, werden vorgelegt und die aufschlussreichsten Methoden diese vor Ort zu untersuchen werden diskutiert. In der Küstenebene waren die Depots nicht weit von Siedlungen entfernt und können mit Überresten von Brandhügeln und seltener auch mit Ackerbegrenzungen in Zusammenhang gebracht werden. Das war in der Kreidelandschaft seltener. Im gesamten Studiengebiet befanden sich diese Funde entlang von Wasserläufen, mit besonderem Schwerpunkt auf kleinere Stätten, die Quellen oder Flußeinmündungen überblicken. Es wird vermutet, daß die Verwahrung von Bronzemetallarbeiten besonderen Konventionen unterstellt war. Aus diesem Grund könnte es in Zukunft möglich sein, ein Verteilungsmuster für Fundstellen zu prognostizieren.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Barber, M 2003. Bronze and the Bronze Age, Stroud: TempusGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R 1990. The Passage of Arms: an archaeological analysis of prehistoric hoards and votive deposits, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R 2005. Ritual and Domestic Life in Prehistoric Europe, Abingdon: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R 2007. The Prehistory of Britain and Ireland, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, D, Brown, N Greenwood, P 1986. ‘Late Bronze Age hoards from the Chelmer valley’, Antiq J, 67, 248266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, P Taylor, T 1995. ‘The faerie smith meets the bronze industry: magic versus science in the interpretation of prehistoric metal-making’, World Archaeol, 27, 133143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, C 1968. ‘The later Bronze Age in the British Isles and north-western France’, Archaeol J, 125, 145Google Scholar
Burgess, C Coombs, D 1979. ‘Preface’, in Bronze Age Hoards: some finds old and new (eds C Burgess and D Coombs), BAR Brit Ser 67, ivii, Oxford: British Archaeological ReportsGoogle Scholar
Coombs, D 1975. ‘Bronze Age weapon hoards in Britain’, Archaeol Atlantica, 1, 4981Google Scholar
Cowie, T 2004. ‘Special places for special axes? Early Bronze Age metalwork from Scotland in its landscape setting’, in Scotland in Ancient Europe (eds I Shepherd and G Barclay), 247261, Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of ScotlandGoogle Scholar
Curwen, E C 1954. The Archaeology of Sussex, London: MethuenGoogle Scholar
Dickins, J 1996. ‘A remote analogy? From central Australian tjurunga to Irish Early Bronze Age axes’, Antiquity, 70, 161167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkin, D 2001. ‘Metalwork, burnt mounds and settlement on the West Sussex coastal plain: a contextual study’, Antiquity, 75, 261262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J 1881. Ancient Bronze Implements, Weapons and Ornaments of Great Britain and Ireland, London: Longman GreenGoogle Scholar
Fontijn, D 2003. ‘Sacrificial landscapes. Cultural biographies of persons, objects and natural places in the Bronze Age of the southern Netherlands c 2300–600 BC’, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, 33/34, 1392Google Scholar
Fox, C 1923. The Archaeology of the Cambridge Region, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Greatorex, C 2003. ‘Living on the margin? The Late Bronze Age landscape of the Willingdon Levels’, in The Archaeology of Sussex to AD 2000 (ed D Rudling), 89100, Brighton: University of Sussex Department of Continuing EducationGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, S Manley, J 2001. ‘Hillforts, monumentality and place: a chronological and topographic review of the first millennium BC hillforts of southern England’, European J Archaeol, 4, 742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, C 1939. ‘The pottery from Castle Hill, Newhaven’, Sussex Archaeol Collect, 80, 263292Google Scholar
Helms, M 1998. Access to Origins, Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar
Helms, M 2009. ‘The mastery of hard materials. Thoughts on technology, materiality and ideology occasioned by the Dover boat’, in Bronze Age Connections (ed P Clark), 149158, Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Holleyman, G Curwen, E C 1935. ‘Late Bronze Age lynchet-settlements at Plumpton Plain, Sussex’, Proc Prehist Soc, 1, 1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, N 2004. Later Iron Age Norfolk. Metalwork, landscape and society, BAR Brit Ser 361, Oxford: ArchaeopressGoogle Scholar
Keef, P 1953. ‘Two gold penannular ornaments from Harting Beacon Sussex’, Antiq J, 33, 204206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, J 1982. Social and Religious Organisation in Bronze Age Denmark: an analysis of ritual hoard finds, BAR Int Ser S124, Oxford: British Archaeological ReportsGoogle Scholar
Miles, D, Palmer, S, Lock, G, Gosden, C Cromarty, A M 2003. Uffington White Horse and its Landscape, Oxford: Oxford ArchaeologyGoogle Scholar
Montelius, O 1909. ‘The chronology of the British Bronze Age’, Archaeologia, 61, 97162Google Scholar
Needham, S 1990. The Petters Late Bronze Age Metalwork: an analytical study of Thames Valley metalworking in its settlement context, Brit Mus Occas Pap 70, London: British Museum PressGoogle Scholar
Needham, S 1996. ‘Chronology and periodisation in the British Bronze Age’, Acta Archaeologica, 67, 121140Google Scholar
Needham, S 2001. ‘When expediency broaches ritual intention: the flow of metal between systemic and buried domains’, J Roy Anthropol Inst, 7, 257278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, S 2007. ‘Bronze makes a Bronze Age? Connecting the systemic of Bronze Age metal use and the implications of selective deposition’, in Beyond Stonehenge (eds C Burgess, P Topping and F Lynch), 278287, Oxford: Oxbow BooksGoogle Scholar
Needham, S, Bronk Ramsay, C, Coombs, D, Cartwright, C Petitt, P 1997. ‘An independent chronology for British Bronze Age metalwork: the results of the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Programme’, Archaeol J, 154, 55107Google Scholar
Randsborg, K 2002. ‘Wetland hoards’, Oxford J Archaeol, 21, 415418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, B 2007. ‘Adorning the living but not the dead: understanding ornaments in Britain c 1400–1100 cal. BC’, Proc Prehist Soc, 73, 135167Google Scholar
Rowlands, M 1971. ‘The archaeological interpretation of prehistoric metalworking’, World Archaeol, 3, 210224Google Scholar
Rowlands, M 1976. The Production and Distribution of Metalwork in the Middle Bronze Age in Southern Britain, BAR Brit Ser 31, Oxford: British Archaeological ReportsGoogle Scholar
Scaife, R Burrin, P 1983. ‘Floodplain development in, and the vegetational history of the Sussex High Weald, and some archaeological implications’, Sussex Archaeol Collect, 121, 110Google Scholar
Scaife, R Burrin, P 1985. ‘The environmental impact of prehistoric man as recorded in the Upper Cuckmere Valley at Stream Farm, Chiddingly’, Sussex Archaeol Collect, 123, 2734Google Scholar
Taylor, R 1993. Hoards of the Bronze Age in Southern Britain: analysis and interpretation, BAR Brit Ser 228, Oxford: British Archaeological ReportsGoogle Scholar
Turner, L 1998. ‘A re-interpretation of the Late Bronze Age metalwork hoards of Essex and Kent’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of GlasgowGoogle Scholar
Yates, D 2007. Land, Power and Prestige. Bronze Age field systems in southern England, Oxford: Oxbow BooksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, D Bradley, R forthcoming. ‘Still water, hidden depths: the deposition of Bronze Age metalwork in the English Fenland’, AntiquityGoogle Scholar