Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:01:13.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

July 1878: Lukis and Dryden in Drente

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

J. A. Bakker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In 1878 the Society of Antiquaries, acknowledging the need for the protection of prehistoric monuments, delegated the Revd. W. C. Lukis and Sir Henry Dryden to the Netherlands to document the megalithic chamber tombs, or hunebedden, of Drente. In the face of well-meaning but erratic local ‘restoration’, Lukis and Dryden produced plans, descriptions and drawings of forty tombs and pottery from them. Although these remained unpublished, the copies sent to Assen helped to establish the high standard of A. E. van Giffen's Atlas and description of The Hunebeds in the Netherlands (1925, 1927).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , March 1979 , pp. 9 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, R. J. C, 1976. ‘Lukis, Dryden and the Carnac Megaliths’, in Megaw, J. V. S. (ed.), To Illustrate the Monuments: Essays on Archaeology presented to Stuart Piggott (London), pp. 111–24.Google Scholar
Daniel, G. E., 1963. The Megalith Builders of Western Europe (Harmondsworth).Google Scholar
De Bonstetten, A., 1865. Essai sur les dolmens (Geneva).Google Scholar
Evans, J., 1956. A History of the Society of Antiquaries (Oxford).Google Scholar
Fergusson, J., 1872. Rude Stone Monuments in all Countries, their Age and Usage (London).Google Scholar
Franks, A. W., 1872. ‘The megalithic monuments of the Netherlands and the means taken by the government of that country for their preservation’, Proc. Soc. Ant. Lond. 2nd ser. v (1870–3), 258–67.Google Scholar
Holwerda, J. H., 1914. ‘Das grosse Steingrab bei Emmen (Prov. Drente)’, Prähistorische Zeitschrift, vi, 57–67.Google Scholar
Janssen, L. J. F., 1848. Drenthsche Oudheden (Utrecht).Google Scholar
Kat-Van Hulten, J. C, 1947. ‘Het hunnebeddenaardewerk en zijn stijlen’, Een kwart eeuw oudheidkundig bodemonderzoek in Nederland, Gedenkboek A. E. van Giffen, ed. H. E. van, Gelderet al. (Meppel), pp. 203–21.Google Scholar
Kendrick, T. D., 1928. The Archaeology of the Channel Islands, 1 (London).Google Scholar
Lukis, W. C, 1875. On the Class of Rude Stone Monuments which are commonly called in England Cromlechs, and in France Dolmens, and are here shown to have been the Sepulchral Chambers of once-existing Mounds. Revealing errors on the subject refuted by a critical examination on the monuments referred to by the maintainers of these errors (Ripon).Google Scholar
Lukis, W. C. 1879. ‘Report on the hunebedden of Drenthe, Netherlands’, Proc. Soc. Ant. Lond. 2nd ser. viii (1879–81), 47–55.Google Scholar
Lukis, W. C. 1880. ‘Report on the prehistoric monuments of Devon and Cornwall’, Proc. Soc. Ant. Lond. 2nd ser. viii (1879–81), 285–92.Google Scholar
Lukis, W. C. 1882. ‘Report on the prehistoric monuments of Avebury and Stonehenge’, Proc. Soc. Ant. Lond. 2nd ser. ix (1881–3), 141–57.Google Scholar
Lukis, W. C. 1885. Prehistoric Stone Monuments of the British Isles: Cornwall (London: Society of Antiquaries).Google Scholar
Lukis, W. C. see the references to most of his other publications by Atkinson, 1976.Google Scholar
Oldenhuis Gratama, L., 1886. De Hunnebedden in Drenthe en aanverwante onderwerpen (Assen).Google Scholar
Pleyte, W., 1880–1883. Nederlandsche Oudheden van de vroegste tijden tot op Karel den Groote. Vol. Drente (Leiden).Google Scholar
Thompson, M. W., 1977. General Pitt-Rivers. Evolution and Archaeology in the Nineteenth Century (Bradford-on-Avon).Google Scholar
Van Giffen, A. E., 1925, 1927. De Hunebedden in Nederland 1, 1925; ii, 1927, Atlas, 1925–7 (Utrecht).Google Scholar
Van Giffen, A. E. 1927. The Hunebeds in the Netherlands. Translation of 1925, 1, with Atlas (Utrecht).Google Scholar
Van Giffen, A. E. 1956. ‘Zur Frage der Einheitlichkeit der Hunenbetten’, Zur Ur- und Frühgeschichte Nordwestdeutschlands, Jakob-Friesen, Festschrift, P., Zylmann (ed.) (Hildesheim), pp. 97–122.Google Scholar
Van Giffen, A. E., 1962. ‘Restauratie en na-onderzoek van het Langgraf (D43) te Emmen (Dr.)’, Heliniumun, ii, 104–14.Google Scholar
Worsaaë, J. J. A., 1845. The Primeval Antiquities of Denmark, trans, by Thorns, W. J. (Oxford).Google Scholar
Worsaaë, J. J. A., 1879. ‘On the preservation of National Antiquities and Monuments in Denmark’, trans, by A. W. Franks from Mém. Soc. Antiq. Nord, 1877, Proc. Soc. Ant. Land. 2nd ser. viii (1879–81), 56–68.Google Scholar