Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:22:30.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Central Gaulish Samian Mould Fragments: (Third Series)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

Extract

A further selection of twenty-eight fragments of samian moulds, originally found by Plicque at Lezoux and formerly belonging to the Oswald–Plicque Collection, is discussed in this paper; like their predecessors, all these fragments are now preserved in the Birley Collection, at the Department of Archaeology, University of Durham.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 60 note 2 I am again greatly indebted to Professor Eric Birley, F.S.A., for allowing me to study and publish these fragments.

page 60 note 3 Stanfield, J. A. and Simpson, Grace, Central Gaulish Potters, London, 1958, fig. 30, p. 196Google Scholar. (Hereafter abbreviated to CGP.)

page 60 note 4 D. followed by a number = Déchelette, J., Les Vases céramiques ernés de la Gaule romaine, Paris, 1904Google Scholar, ii; O. followed by a number = Oswald, F., Index of Figure-types on Terra Sigillata (Samian Ware), Liverpool, 19361937, iivGoogle Scholar.

page 60 note 5 CGP.pl. 104/4.

page 60 note 6 CGP, pl. 104/2.

page 60 note 7 CGP, pl. 104/5.

page 60 note 8 CGP, pl. 105/12.

page 60 note 9 CGP, pl. 108/36.

page 60 note 10 Karnitsch, P., Die Reliefsigillata von Ovilava (Wels, Oberösterreich), Linz, 1959, Taf. 46/3Google Scholar. (Hereafter abbreviated to Wels)

page 60 note 11 CGP, pl. 104/4.

page 60 note 12 F. Oswald, Index, 22.

page 60 note 13 CGP, pl. 105/15.

page 60 note 14 Wels, Taf. 48/1.

page 60 note 15 CGP, pl. 123/39.

page 60 note 16 CGP, pl. 123/35.

page 60 note 17 CGP, pl. 123/37.

page 60 note 18 e.g. CGP, pl. 123/35.

page 62 note 1 CGP, pl. 119/7.

page 62 note 2 Wels, Taf. 54/2.

page 62 note 3 CW 2, lxv (1965), 96Google Scholar, and fig. 3, no. 16.

page 62 note 4 CGP, fig. 36, p. 221.

page 62 note 5 CGP, pl. 125/4.

page 62 note 6 CGP, pl. 125/2.

page 62 note 7 CGP, pl. 126/14.

page 62 note 8 CGP, fig. 27, p. 184.

page 62 note 9 CGP, pl. 98/8.

page 62 note 10 CGP, pl. 99/20.

page 62 note 11 CGP, pl. 100/24.

page 63 note 1 CGP, fig. 30, p. 196.

page 63 note 2 CGP, 194.

page 63 note 3 CGP, pl. 104/4.

page 63 note 4 CGP, fig. 35, p. 216.

page 63 note 5 CGP, pl. 122/24.

page 63 note 6 CGP, pl. 121/13.

page 63 note 7 CGP, fig. 13, p. 55.

page 63 note 8 Wels, Taf. 33/4.

page 63 note 9 CGP, pl. 61/686.

page 63 note 10 F. Oswald, Index, 22.

page 63 note 11 CGP, pl. 58/657.

page 63 note 12 CGP, pl. 58/660.

page 63 note 13 CGP, fig. 47, p. 267.

page 63 note 14 Wels, Taf. 66/1 and 2.

page 63 note 15 CGP, pl. 160/35.

page 63 note 16 CGP, pl. 161/47.

page 65 note 1 CGP, fig. 30, p. 196.

page 65 note 2 CGP, pl. 105/17.

page 65 note 3 CGP.pl. 104/4.

page 65 note 4 CGP, pl. 104/8.

page 65 note 5 CGP, pl. 105/12.

page 65 note 6 Wels, Taf. 46/1.

page 65 note 7 CGP.pl. 107/31.

page 65 note 8 CGP, pl. 105/15.

page 65 note 9 CGP, pl. 59/672.

page 65 note 10 CGP, pl. 58/660.

page 65 note 11 Bushe-Fox, J. P., Fourth Report on the Excavations of the Roman Fort at Richborough, Kent, London, 1949, pl. LXXXII, no. 56Google Scholar.

page 65 note 12 CGP, pl. 120/6.

page 65 note 13 Antiq. Journ., xlii (1962), 31Google Scholar, fig. 1, no. 6.

page 65 note 14 F. Oswald, Index, 102.

page 65 note 15 CGP, pl. 106/22.

page 65 note 16 CGP, pl. 123/35.

page 65 note 17 CGP, pl. 123/41 and 42.

page 65 note 18 CGP, fig. 13, p. 55.

page 65 note 19 CGP, fig. 35, p. 216.

page 65 note 20 CGP, fig. 25, p. 180.

page 65 note 21 CGP, pl. 95/14.

page 66 note 1 CGP, pl. 128/4.

page 66 note 2 CGP, fig. 37, p. 224.

page 66 note 3 CGP, pl. 126/11.

page 66 note 4 CGP, fig. 44, p. 253.

page 66 note 5 F. Oswald, Index, 54.

page 66 note 6 CGP, fig. 13, p. 55.

page 66 note 7 CGP, fig. 12, p. 49.

page 66 note 8 F. Oswald, Index, 145.

page 66 note 9 CGP, pl. 104/4 and 6.

page 66 note 10 CGP, fig. 30, p. 196.

page 66 note 11 CGP, pl. 106/22.

page 66 note 12 CGP, pl. 106/25.

page 66 note 13 CGP, pl. 106/20.

page 66 note 14 Wels, Taf. 52/3.

page 68 note 1 CGP, pl. 52/613.

page 68 note 2 CGP, pl. 54/636.

page 68 note 3 CGP, pl. 55/inv. 57.

page 68 note 4 CGP, 190.

page 68 note 5 Wels, Taf. 44/4.

page 68 note 6 CGP, pl. 101/1.

page 68 note 7 CGP, pl. 53/618.

page 68 note 8 CGP, fig. 12, p. 49.

page 68 note 9 CGP, pl. 55/inv. 50.

page 68 note 10 CGP, pl. 55/646.

page 68 note 11 F. Oswald, Index, 31.

page 68 note 12 CGP, pl. 51/601.

page 68 note 13 F. Oswald, Index, 88.

page 68 note 14 ibid. p. 73.

page 68 note 15 CGP, pl. 159/26.

page 68 note 16 CGP, pl. 158/21 and 163/74.

page 68 note 17 CGP, pl. 163/66 and 70.

page 69 note 1 Arch. Cant., xviii (1889), 14Google Scholar.

page 69 note 2 CGP, fig. 30, p. 196.

page 69 note 3 CGP, pl. 54/634.

page 69 note 4 F. Oswald, Index, 57.

page 69 note 5 CGP, fig. 12, p.49.

page 69 note 6 CGP, pl. 51/601.

page 69 note 7 CGP, pl. 54/634.