^{page 332 note 1} Wheeler, R.E.M., Y Cymmrodor, xxxiii (1923), 54–7Google Scholar, cf. fig. 17; ibid., 67–8 (in my opinion the lower or main filling, including the seam of earthy silt, is all contemporary).

^{page 332 note 2} Davies, R. W., ‘A Note on Lorictitis’, Bonner Jahrb. clxviii (1968), 163–5Google Scholar; Gamer, G., Germania, xlvi (1968), 53–66Google Scholar, and id., Kaiserztl. Bronzestatuen aus den Kastellen und Legionslägern am Rhein- u. Donaugrenze des röm. Imp. (Inaugural-Dissertation, 1969—no illus.).

^{page 332 note 3} Boon, G. C., Arch. Camb. cxix (1970), 31–2, 41–7.Google Scholar

^{page 332 note 4} Richmond, I. A., Antiq. Journ. xxiv (1944), 7–9Google Scholar

^{page 332 note 5} Boube-Piccot, C., Les Bronzes antiques du Maroc (1969), i, 33 ff., 40 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 332 note 6} Gamer, Germania, loc. cit., Taf. 15, 3 (see also Boon, loc. cit., fig. 11, 3).

^{page 332 note 7} e.g. Boube-Piccot, op. cit., pls. 38, 54. On the development of the kilt, see Richmond, loc. cit. and the corpus of statues assembled by Vermeule, C. C., Berytus, xiii, xv, and xvi (1959–1960, 1964, 1966).Google Scholar

^{page 332 note 8} Gamer, Germania, loc. cit., Taf. 10, 4; Boon, loc. cit., fig. 11, 1; Tudor, D., oltenia Romană (ed. 3, 1968), pp. 300–1, fig. 80.Google Scholar

^{page 333 note 1} e.g. Boube-Piccot, op. cit., pls. 41, 44.

^{page 333 note 2} Wheeler, loc. cit., pp. 54–6 (I believe the cement rendering was original and not a secondary covering).

^{page 333 note 3} Tudor, op. cit., p. 301.

^{page 333 note 4} Boon, loc. cit., pp. 31–2.

^{page 333 note 5} R.I.B., i, no. 429. The other material, Wheeler, loc. cit., pp. 68, 80.

^{page 333 note 6} These are not likely to have been coined after c. 340 when a different type was issued from the mints. Indeed Constantinopolis probably ceased to be issued in 335; but was counterfeited in the period c. 337–40 in Somerset (White Woman's Hole).