Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:20:01.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Outpatient treatment and clinical outcomes of bacteriuria in veterans: A retrospective cohort analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2022

Suzette A. Rovelsky
Affiliation:
Pharmacy Service, Boise Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, Boise, Idaho Pharmacy Service, White River Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont
Michelle Vu
Affiliation:
Center for Medication Safety (VA MedSAFE), Hines Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois Optum Life Sciences-HEOR, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Alexis K. Barrett
Affiliation:
Center for Medication Safety (VA MedSAFE), Hines Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Kenneth Bukowski
Affiliation:
Center for Medication Safety (VA MedSAFE), Hines Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Xiangming Wei
Affiliation:
Center for Medication Safety (VA MedSAFE), Hines Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Muriel Burk
Affiliation:
Center for Medication Safety (VA MedSAFE), Hines Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Makoto Jones
Affiliation:
George E. Wahlen Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
Kelly Echevarria
Affiliation:
Veterans’ Affairs Pharmacy Benefits Management, Hines Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Katie J Suda
Affiliation:
Pittsburgh Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Francesca Cunningham
Affiliation:
Center for Medication Safety (VA MedSAFE), Hines Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Karl J Madaras-Kelly*
Affiliation:
Pharmacy Service, Boise Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, Boise, Idaho College of Pharmacy, Idaho State University, Meridian, Idaho
*
Author for correspondence: Karl J Madaras-Kelly, Pharmacy Service, Boise Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center, T111, 500 W Fort St, Boise, ID83702. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

To conduct a contemporary detailed assessment of outpatient antibiotic prescribing and outcomes for positive urine cultures in a mixed-sex cohort.

Design:

Multicenter retrospective cohort review.

Setting:

The study was conducted using data from 31 Veterans’ Affairs medical centers.

Patients:

Outpatient adults with positive urine cultures.

Methods:

From 2016 to 2019, data were extracted through a nationwide database and manual chart review. Positive urine cultures were reviewed at the chart, clinician, and aggregate levels. Cases were classified as cystitis, pyelonephritis, or asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) based upon documented signs and symptoms. Preferred therapy definitions were applied for subdiagnoses: ASB (no antibiotics), cystitis (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, nitrofurantoin, β-lactams), and pyelonephritis (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, fluoroquinolone). Outcomes included 30-day clinical failure or hospitalization. Odds ratios for outcomes between treatments were estimated using logistic regression.

Results:

Of 3,255 cases reviewed, ASB was identified in 1,628 cases (50%), cystitis was identified in 1,156 cases (36%), and pyelonephritis was identified in 471 cases (15%). Of all 2,831 cases, 1,298 (46%) received preferred therapy selection and duration for cases where it could be defined. The most common antibiotic class prescribed was a fluoroquinolone (34%). Patients prescribed preferred therapy had lower odds of clinical failure: preferred (8%) versus nonpreferred (10%) (unadjusted OR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–0.95; P = .018). They also had lower odds of 30-day hospitalization: preferred therapy (3%) versus nonpreferred therapy (5%) (unadjusted OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37–0.81; P = .002). Odds of clinical treatment failure or hospitalization was higher for β-lactams relative to ciprofloxacin (unadjusted OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.23–2.90; P = .002).

Conclusions:

Clinicians prescribed preferred therapy 46% of the time. Those prescribed preferred therapy had lower odds of clinical failure and of being hospitalized.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© Veterans Health Administration, 2022

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common diagnosis for which antibiotics are prescribed. Reference Simmering and Tang1 Increasing antibiotic resistance has made conservation of treatment options a priority. 2,3 Optimizing antibiotic use through diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship will help curtail the development of antibiotic resistance.

The Veterans’ Healthcare Administration (VA) has developed robust inpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs. Reference Kelly, Jones and Echevarria4 Recent efforts have focused on improving stewardship in outpatient settings, where 75% of antibiotics are prescribed. Reference Suda, Hicks and Roberts5,Reference Sanchez, Fleming-Dutra and Roberts6 The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for UTI management in female patients are undergoing revision, and minimal guidance is available for treating UTIs in male patients. Reference Gupta, Hooton and Naber7Reference Hooton and Gupta10 With calls to reduce fluoroquinolone prescriptions for cystitis, recent literature indicates changes in the prescription of antibiotic classes for uncomplicated UTI treatment. Reference Gupta, Hooton and Naber7,Reference Hooton9Reference Kulchavenya14 Furthermore, unnecessary antibiotic treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is common, but it is hard to identify without chart review. Reference Spivak, Burk and Zhang15

A systematic, criteria-based quality improvement analysis of UTI management in VA outpatients was conducted by the VA Antimicrobial Stewardship Task Force (ASTF) and VA MedSAFE. Reference Kelly, Jones and Echevarria4 To facilitate quality improvement, the primary objectives of this analysis included (1) comparison of clinical outcomes and safety events for patients treated with preferred and non-preferred therapy of ASB and UTI and (2) comparison of provider-level, database-derived measures of UTI management and their association with chart-level indicators of preferred management.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of outpatients with positive urine cultures with monomicrobial growth (≥105 CFU/mL) collected during fiscal years 2016–2019 was created. Polymicrobial cultures were excluded to reduce misinterpretation of infection versus contamination. Reference Xu, Deebel and Casals16 Data were obtained from the Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW). A manual electronic health record (EHR) review was conducted by local antimicrobial stewards within VA medical centers (VAMCs) from November 2019 to April 2020. Completion of data abstraction was facilitated by monthly webinar calls with VA MedSAFE.

The cohort was constructed by randomly selecting 5–10 outpatient clinicians from each VAMC who ordered ≥15 urine cultures. Urine cultures ordered by those clinicians were randomly selected for further review. Each urine culture that met the criteria was classified as a case. Clinicians were selected from emergency departments, primary care, or specialty clinics (ie, geriatric, women’s health, or home-based primary care). The following exclusions were applied: complicated cases (eg, prostatitis, prior hospitalization within 7 days, spinal cord injury, hospital admission within 24 hours), urine cultures ordered by urology, urine cultures ordered from locations without on-site pharmacies, or urine cultures ordered when ASB treatment was appropriate (ie, pregnancy, scheduled invasive urologic procedures) (Supplementary Material). The maximum number of records reviewed per VAMC was 200 (ie, 10 clinicians with 20 positive urine cultures). Cases that met CDW-based criteria underwent further screening at the EHR-level to ensure that all criteria were met.

Chart abstraction was conducted if cases met all inclusion and no exclusion criteria. Extracted data included patient demographics (eg, urologic comorbidities), visit characteristics, signs and symptoms, antibiotic resistance risk factors, treatment rationale, laboratory results, antibiotic selection and duration, adverse drug events (ADEs), and UTI-related outcomes. Manual EHR review was employed to retrieve documentation difficult to extract within the CDW. ADEs were assessed when a patient had a return outpatient visit within 30 days with symptoms consistent with an ADE. (Training was provided on the use of the Liverpool Causation Tool.) Reference Gallagher, Kirkham and Mason17

Additional CDW data were extracted for ordering clinicians. These data included provider-level demographics, diagnostic test-ordering patterns, bacterial susceptibilities, and select clinical outcomes (Supplementary Material).

Diagnostic subgroups of UTI were classified by chart-documented signs and symptoms. Reference Gupta, Hooton and Naber7Reference Hooton and Gupta10,Reference Spivak, Burk and Zhang15,Reference Gallagher, Kirkham and Mason17 The diagnostic definitions were based on published guidelines and were vetted in an iterative process within an ASTF workgroup. Reference Gupta, Hooton and Naber7Reference Hooton and Gupta10,Reference Spivak, Burk and Zhang15,Reference Gallagher, Kirkham and Mason17 Acute simple cystitis (ie, cystitis) was defined as dysuria, frequency, urgency, or suprapubic pain without flank pain, costovertebral angle (CVA) tenderness, rigors, fevers (≤37.3°C), or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Acute pyelonephritis (ie, pyelonephritis) was defined by ≥1 symptom of cystitis plus either flank pain, CVA tenderness, rigors, fevers (>37.3°C), or SIRS criteria. ASB was defined as a lack of documentation of any of these signs or symptoms.

Preferred therapy was classified for cases based on the initial treatment received per clinical guidelines and updated guidance Reference Gupta, Hooton and Naber7Reference Kulchavenya14,Reference Rubin, Shapiro and Vincent18Reference Langner, Chiang and Stafford20 (Supplementary Material). For cystitis, preferred therapy was defined as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), β-lactams (ie, cephalosporins or aminopenicillins), or nitrofurantoin. Fluoroquinolones were defined as preferred therapy only if an allergy or contraindication was documented for other preferred therapies. For pyelonephritis, preferred therapy was defined as TMP-SMX, ciprofloxacin, or levofloxacin unless antibiotic resistance risk factors were present within the past 3 months (ie, culture of gram-negative bacteria resistant to ceftriaxone, TMP-SMX or fluoroquinolones; prescription of TMP-SMX, third- or later-generation cephalosporin, or fluoroquinolone; inpatient or skilled nursing facility stay; or travel abroad). Reference Gupta, Hooton and Naber7,Reference Hooton and Gupta10Reference Fox, Melia, Same, Conley and Tamma12,Reference Langner, Chiang and Stafford20Reference Johnson, Sabel and Burman25 If a patient had an antibiotic-resistance risk factor, initial oral preferred therapy choices were similar; however, an intravenous or intramuscular dose of carbapenem or aminoglycoside was required. Reference Langner, Chiang and Stafford20Reference Johnson, Sabel and Burman25 Any therapy to which a patient had an allergy documentation, contraindication, nonsusceptibility to the antibiotic prescribed within the prior 3 months was nonpreferred. ASB preferred therapy was defined as no antibiotic prescribed. Reference Nicolle, Gupta and Bradley8

For female patients with cystitis, the preferred treatment duration was consistent with IDSA guideline recommendations, except β-lactam duration was 7 days. Reference Gupta, Hooton and Naber7 For male patients with cystitis, duration was preferred if the antibiotic was prescribed for 7 days (5 days for levofloxacin). Reference Hooton9 For both male and female patients with pyelonephritis, preferred therapy duration was defined as ciprofloxacin for 7 days or levofloxacin for 5 days, TMP-SMX for 14 days, and β-lactam therapy for 10–14 days. Reference Gupta, Hooton and Naber7,Reference Hooton and Gupta10 The preferred ASB antibiotic duration was 0 days.

Outcomes extracted through chart review included return visits within 30 days for any urinary tract–related complaint, clinical treatment failure (ie, presence of new, unresolved, or worsening UTI symptoms), and ADE. Outcomes extracted from the CDW included 30-day hospitalization and 60-day new-onset Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI).

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographics and visit data. Outcomes were compared for preferred and nonpreferred antibiotic selection and antibiotic class. Subgroup analyses using a composite outcome defined as failure (ie, clinical failure plus 30-day hospitalization) were conducted for diagnoses, treatment selection, or duration by diagnoses and sex. Unadjusted odds ratios for outcomes were estimated using logistic regression. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant. Linear regression was used to assess the correlation between chart review–generated measures of UTI management with CDW database–derived measures for each clinician. EHR-derived measures of UTI management included the proportion of ASB cases prescribed antibiotics and the frequency of preferred therapy prescription and duration. Database-derived measures were constructed for frequency of urinary laboratory tests ordered, International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10)–coded UTI diagnoses, antibiotic selection, and duration (Supplementary Material).

This analysis was deemed a quality improvement study by the Edward Hines, Jr, VA Hospital Institutional Review Board. 27 Data use agreements were signed for all VAMCs.

Results

In total, 4,531 urine cultures were reviewed within 31 VAMCs. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, the final cohort included 3,255 cases (Fig. 1). Common reasons for exclusion were subsequent hospitalizations or death. Overall, 259 clinicians ordered urine cultures: 191 physicians (74%) and 68 advanced-care practitioners (26%). Among them, 162 clinicians practiced in ambulatory care and 97 clinicians practiced in the emergency department. The mean patient age was 70 years (SD, ±14), and 2,490 (76%) of these 3,255 were male (Table 1). Also, 44% had ≥1 relevant comorbidity: benign prostatic hyperplasia (33%), urinary flow obstruction (8%), and nephrolithiasis (4%). Most patients were afebrile (99%). Furthermore, 12% had urinary catheterization within 7 days prior to culture collection, and 822 (25%) had no physical visit within a 6-day period (−1 to +5 days) surrounding urine-culture collection. Among these patients, 43% were prescribed an antibiotic.

Fig. 1. Flow diagram of outpatient UTI treatment medication utilization review. (A) Criteria are not mutually exclusive. (B) Preferred duration was further identified in 2,831 cases (eg, externally filled prescriptions with only antibiotic selection identified).

Table 1. Characteristics of Patient Cases Meeting Utilization Review Criteria

Note. SD, standard deviation; BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; MDRO, multidrug-resistant organism; TMP-SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; SNF, skilled nursing facility.

a Antibiotic-resistant Enterobacterales included resistance to fluoroquinolone, ceftriaxone, or carbapenem cultured from any source.

b Antibiotics included fluoroquinolone, TMP-SMX, or third- or fourth-generation cephalosporin.

c Inpatient stay includes hospitalization or skilled nursing facility residence.

d Excluded travel abroad.

Moreover, ASB was identified in 1,628 cases (50%), cystitis was identified in 1,156 cases (36%), and pyelonephritis was identified in 471 cases (15%). Overall, 40% of cases with ASB were prescribed antibiotics, which was more likely if the urinalysis had pyuria [present (42%) vs absent (32%); P = .002], leukocyte esterase [positive (41%) vs negative (34%); P = .011], or microscopic hematuria [present (43%) vs absent (37%); P = .008].

Preferred antibiotics were selected in 1,774 (55%) of 3,211 cases (including ASB) for which preferred therapy could be defined. For cystitis and pyelonephritis, 791 (49%) of 1,600 cases received preferred antibiotic selection. Preferred duration was prescribed for 1,494 (53%) of 2,831 cases (including ASB); 1,138 (40%) of 2,831 cases received a longer duration; and 199 (7%) of 2,831 cases received a shorter duration when preferred duration could be defined (Supplementary Material). A composite of both preferred antibiotic selection and duration was identified in 1,298 (46%) of 2,831 cases.

Fluoroquinolones (34%) were the most prescribed antibiotic class. Of 312 fluoroquinolone prescriptions for cystitis, another preferred antibiotic could have been prescribed for 83%. For cases with pyelonephritis symptoms, 69 (15%) of 471 cases were treated with nitrofurantoin.

Of 471 pyelonephritis cases, 92 (20%) had at least 1 antibiotic-resistance risk factor; no case received a dose of an aminoglycoside or carbapenem. Escherichia coli was the most identified organism (n = 1,287 cases). Outpatient antibiotic susceptibilities for E. coli were ciprofloxacin-levofloxacin (80%), TMP-SMX (80%), nitrofurantoin (96%), ceftriaxone (94%), cefazolin (88%), amoxicillin-clavulanate (82%), gentamicin (94%), and ertapenem (100%). Additional susceptibilities are reported in the Supplementary Material.

The overall urinary symptom-related return-visit rate was 12.9% (420 of 3,255 cases). Clinical treatment failure was the predominant reason for these visits (69%). The all-cause 30-day hospitalization rate was 3.6% (117 of 3,255 cases). The overall prevalence of new-onset CDI was 0.1% (3 cases), and the documented ADE rate was 0.6% (13 of 2,028 cases).

Clinical treatment failure was lower for those who received preferred therapy than those who received nonpreferred therapy (8% vs 10%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–0.95; P = .018) (Table 2). Hospitalization rates were lower among patients who received preferred antibiotic therapies versus those who received nonpreferred antibiotic therapies (3% vs 5%, respectively; OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37–0.81; P = .002). Female patients had a lower rate of return visits than male patients (9% vs 14%, respectively; OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49–0.85; P = .001) and a lower rate of hospitalizations (2% vs 4%, respectively; OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18–0.67; P < .001). There were no differences in the frequency of ADE or CDI based on therapy selection.

Table 2. Clinical Outcomes for Patients Who Received Preferred or Nonpreferred Outpatient UTI Treatment

Note. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence intervals; UTI, urinary tract infection. Bold indicates statistical significance.

a Fisher exact test.

In patients with cystitis and pyelonephritis, the composite outcome of clinical failure or hospitalization was higher for β-lactams relative to ciprofloxacin (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.23–2.90; P = .002) and TMP-SMX (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.00–2.26; P = .050). In particular, advanced-generation cephalosporins had a higher composite failure rate (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.63–4.85; P < .001) relative to ciprofloxacin. Composite failure was also higher for nitrofurantoin (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.01–2.44; P = .040) relative to ciprofloxacin (Table 3).

Table 3. Clinical Outcomes for Patient Cases with Acute Cystitis and Pyelonephritis by Antibiotic Class

Note. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; TMP-SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Bold indicates statistical significance.

a Clinical treatment failure is defined as a return visit with new, unresolved, or worsening UTI symptoms.

b Ciprofloxacin was the reference group for all individual antibiotics and antibiotic classes.

c First-generation cephalosporins included cephalexin.

d Advanced generation cephalosporins included cefuroxime, cefdinir, cefpodoxime, cefaclor, cefditoren.

e Other included doxycycline, fosfomycin, moxifloxacin, tetracycline, and unspecified.

Sex differences by drug class were also observed: female patients were more likely to have treatment failure with β-lactams (25%) than ciprofloxacin (4%) or TMP-SMX (9%): β-lactams versus ciprofloxacin (P = .003) and β-lactams versus TMP-SMX (P = .014). Male patients experienced higher composite treatment failure with β-lactams (23%) compared to ciprofloxacin (15%) but not TMP-SMX (21%): β-lactams versus ciprofloxacin (P = .022) and β-lactams versus TMP-SMX (P = .530) (Supplementary Material). Antibiotic treatment of ASB exhibited higher composite treatment failure than withholding antibiotics (12% vs 6%, respectively; OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.51–3.24; P < .001) (Supplementary Material).

For cystitis and pyelonephritis, longer duration compared to preferred duration was associated with a lower composite outcome rate (13% vs 19%, respectively; OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46–0.93; P = .017). There was no difference in composite treatment failure based on duration of therapy for female patients; however, in male patients a longer duration compared to preferred duration was associated with a lower composite failure rate (15% vs 21%, respectively; OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44–0.98; P = .031). The decreased composite failure rate associated with a longer duration of therapy relative to preferred duration was observed exclusively in male patients with cystitis treated with ciprofloxacin (6% vs 23%, respectively; OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07–0.88; P = .001) (Supplementary Material).

We conducted 14 statistically significant regression analyses that compared clinician-level EHR-generated measures of UTI management and database-derived measures (Supplementary Material). No measures exhibited a strong correlation (ie, R2 ≥ 0.75) with clinical end points of interest. Reference Moore, Notz and Flinger28 We identified 4 moderately positive (ie, R2 ≥0.25 to <0.75) correlations of database-derived measures with ASB treatment: (1) proportion of urinalyses ordered with antibiotics prescribed (R2 = 0.30; P < .001); (2) proportion of urine cultures ordered with antibiotics prescribed (R2 = 0.31; P < .001); (3) proportion of UTI diagnostic codes (excluding pyelonephritis) per 100 visits (R2 = 0.27; P < .001); and (4) UTI diagnostic codes (excluding pyelonephritis) with antibiotics prescribed per 100 visits (R2 = 0.27; P < .001) (Supplementary Material). A database-derived measure demonstrating moderate correlation with clinician prescribing of fluoroquinolones for cystitis was the proportion of UTI diagnostic codes (excluding pyelonephritis) treated with a fluoroquinolone (R2 = 0.27; P < .001).

Discussion

In this retrospective cohort of outpatients with positive urine culture, half had no documented UTI-related signs or symptoms. Of these, 40% were treated with antibiotics. Patients with ASB treated with antibiotics returned more frequently than those not treated. Overall, 46% of the cohort received preferred treatment selection and duration based on historical guidelines and contemporary tertiary references. Despite cautions against prescribing fluoroquinolones for cystitis, ciprofloxacin was the most prescribed antibiotic. However, symptomatic cases prescribed β-lactams experienced UTI-related return visits and hospitalization more frequently than those treated with ciprofloxacin. Treatment failure with nitrofurantoin was also higher than with ciprofloxacin; however, a quarter of these cases had symptoms of pyelonephritis, suggesting poor identification of patients for whom nitrofurantoin is indicated. Antibiotic-resistance risk factors were identified in 20% of the pyelonephritis cases, and empirical broad-spectrum intravenous or intramuscular therapy was not initiated in any patient. Finally, no database-derived measure exhibited strong correlation with provider-level treatment of ASB or overprescribing of fluoroquinolones, but several measures demonstrated moderate correlation. Refinement of these measures may guide development of metrics to track quality improvement for UTI management over time.

The strengths of this study include the standardized data collection protocol with detailed diagnostic and treatment definitions, the ability to confirm database findings with EHR-level review, and inclusion of a relatively high proportion (24%) of female veterans, which allowed evaluation of both sexes. The premise for the cystitis preferred therapy definition was based on a fluoroquinolone-sparing approach with preference given to TMP-SMX, nitrofurantoin, or β-lactams. EHR abstraction was critical to identifying (1) patient exclusion criteria not otherwise obtainable, (2) signs and symptoms of UTI, and (3) undesirable UTI management end points.

This study also had several limitations. We relied on EHR documentation to identify the anatomical source of infection, which could have contributed to classification bias. Some cases classified as having ASB could have had UTIs; however, those with documented ASB and treatment had higher return rates than those who did not receive treatment. These findings suggest that alternative noninfectious conditions may have been misdiagnosed and undertreated. A 2-tiered approach to exclude prostatitis was used via diagnostic coding and EHR-level review, but it is possible that some cases had undocumented prostatitis. The culture time frame did not fit every clinical scenario; some cases may have had antibiotics prescribed outside the 6-day window. Although is important to recognize that the population consisted of predominantly older veterans when generalizing the findings, patients with early subsequent hospitalization and mortality were excluded. This analysis was conducted as a quality improvement project, and the outcome analyses were not risk-adjusted but stratified, which limits causal interpretations. Assessment of the association between index culture antibiotic sensitivity and treatment outcome is beyond the scope of our quality improvement project. To minimize the burden on chart abstractors, susceptibility data were extracted from the CDW. Only 17% of patients with cystitis or pyelonephritis treated with antibiotics had a reported sensitivity interpretation to the prescribed antibiotic. These findings are likely due to individual facility variability on sensitivity reporting (ie, manual EHR entry). In cases for whom sensitivities could be interpreted, only 2.3% of these cases were resistant to a preferred therapy. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by removing discordant treatment-susceptibility cases, which did not alter the statistical significance of the findings. Finally, although regression analyses were limited to clinicians with ≥15 urine cultures, the accuracy to identify metrics focusing specifically on clinician-level management of ASB or cystitis was limited.

Our findings support recommendations to withhold ASB treatment in cases without indications for prophylaxis, and prudent assessment of symptoms is essential to appropriate treatment. Reference Hooton9 Compared to a similar VHA inpatient UTI analysis conducted in 2013–2014, ASB was seen almost as frequently in the outpatient setting but was treated less often than in the inpatient setting. Reference Spivak, Burk and Zhang15 Clinician awareness and outpatient antibiotic stewardship may have led to reduced ASB treatment over time; however, minimal change in outpatient ASB treatment by cohort year (43% in 2016 vs 38% in 2019) was observed. US prescribing data suggest that fluoroquinolone use has decreased by half between 2015 and 2019. Reference Moore, Notz and Flinger28 However, our data suggest that in contrast to FDA warnings, clinicians still frequently prescribe fluoroquinolone antibiotics for cystitis. We also identified a significant number of cases of oral antibiotics with reduced systemic concentrations (ie, nitrofurantoin, β-lactams) prescribed for pyelonephritis when fluoroquinolones may have been preferred. Contemporary tertiary references suggest that men with cystitis and an absence of prostatitis symptoms may be treated with 7 days of antibiotics. Reference Hooton9 A recent randomized controlled noninferiority trial of TMP-SMX and ciprofloxacin for afebrile UTI in men with limited comorbid complications found no difference in clinical failure rates between 7 and 14 days of therapy; further analysis of the preferred duration in male patients is needed. Reference Hooton9,Reference Germanos, Trautner and Zoorob29,Reference Drekonja, Trautner, Amundson, Kuskowski and Johnson30 The transition away from fluoroquinolone to non–fluoroquinolone-based UTI treatment, especially toward β-lactams, has been well documented. 13,Reference Kulchavenya14,Reference Buehrle, Wagener and Clancy31 However, sufficiently powered clinical efficacy studies are lacking in many patient populations for β-lactams; particularly for advanced-generation cephalosporins. Some studies have found diminished efficacy of advanced-generation cephalosporins relative to ciprofloxacin in women. Reference Hooton, Roberts and Stapleton32

Recent studies have identified antibiotic-resistance risk factors for UTIs, and well-established references recommend utilizing broad-spectrum coverage with a carbapenem or aminoglycoside in addition to oral therapy for these cases. Reference Hooton9,Reference Hooton and Gupta10,Reference Langner, Chiang and Stafford20Reference Johnson, Sabel and Burman25 Utilizing parenteral antibiotics may prove necessary in areas with reduced TMP-SMX and fluoroquinolone susceptibilities. Further validation of treatment outcomes based on these risk factors is needed.

Future work includes development of an interventional strategy to mitigate the findings. Academic detailing campaigns have been successful at improving management of other infectious syndrome-based conditions within the VHA, and a clinician-directed academic detailing campaign for UTIs is under development. Reference Madaras-Kelly, Hostler and Townsend33 Additional work is needed to develop and validate EHR-based metrics to capture UTI diagnosis and management, which may facilitate continuous, systematic quality review. With the heterogeneity of genitourinary tract presentations, an aging population, and the large shift in treatment away from fluoroquinolone treatment, research is needed to determine the role of β-lactam treatment for UTIs. Finally, incorporation and validation of antibiotic risk-factor identification into treatment algorithms and their impact on clinical outcomes is needed.

In conclusion, this analysis demonstrated that the preferred treatment in a cohort of veterans with positive urine cultures was prescribed less than half the time. Those who received preferred therapy had a lower odds of clinical failure and being hospitalized with no significant impact on adverse events. Clinicians should carefully differentiate upper- and lower-tract UTI symptoms to aid in selection of preferred therapy. Clinicians should also assess when to use specific antimicrobials, including the use of fluoroquinolones, on a case-by-case basis. These findings suggest clinicians could benefit from educational and interventional strategies that target appropriate selection and duration of therapy.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.285.

Acknowledgments

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA). The authors acknowledge members of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Task Force and Antimicrobial Stewardship Taskforce Implementation Work Group.

Financial support

This work was supported by the resources of the Department of Veterans’ Affairs. As a quality improvement project, no grant funding was used to support this work.

Conflicts of interest

M.V. completed this work as a Medication Safety and Pharmacy Outcomes Fellow with the Department of Veterans’ Affairs. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Research transparency and reproducibility

Data have been retained in accordance with VA and VHA policy including the following: VA Handbook 5011/5, Chapter 4 (Alternative Workplace Arrangements); VA Directive and Handbook 6500, Information Security Program; VA Directive and Handbook 6502, Privacy Program; VHA Directive 1605 Privacy Program, VHA Handbook 1605.1 and 1605.2 and VHA Handbook 1200.12, Use of Data and Data Repositories in VHA Research. None of the VHA data, any data extracted or derived from this report, or other data files provided by the VHA, can be released to any other organization or individual external to your organization without the appropriate approval of the transferring VHA office.

Footnotes

a

Collaborators in the Management of Outpatient Urinary Tract Infections Medication Use Evaluation Group: Sioux Falls VA: Andrea Aylward, PharmD, BCPS, Nikki Carr, PharmD Candidate, Sean Curley, PharmD Candidate; Augusta VA: Patrick Tu, PharmD, Melanie Siv, PharmD, Angelia Walton, PharmD; Bay Pines VA: Joseph Hong, PharmD, Nicole Storm Miller, PharmD, Alexander Branton, PharmD; Boston VA: Muhammad Dhanani, MD, Judith Strymish, MD; Bronx VA: Kirsten Vest, PharmD, Mei Chang, PharmD, Troy Kish, PharmD; Butler VA: Alyssa Bowser, PharmD; Chicago VA: Kaylee Caniff, PharmD, Andrea Beshalske, PharmD, Lisa Young, PharmD; West Palm Beach VA: Marisel Segarra-Newnham, PharmD; Detroit VA: Ryan Kuhn, PharmD; Veterans’ HCS of the Ozarks: Michele Walker, PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP, Kandise Buie, PharmD, Michelle Rushano, PharmD; Leavenworth VA: Emily Potter, PharmD; Las Vegas VA: Ashafq Shafiq, PharmD, Ashley Juan, PharmD; Lexington VA: Kelly Davis, PharmD, Jacob Matano, PharmD; Memphis VA: Jessica Bennett, PharmD, Tommie Jo Guidry, PharmD; New Orleans VA: Brian LeBaron, PharmD, Angelia Hamilton, PharmD; Omaha VA: Pamela Foral, PharmD, BCPS, Ashleigh Grammar, PharmD, Andrew Mitchell-Bueso, PharmD, Kelly Baxter, PharmD, Whitney Specht, PharmD; VA Central Iowa HCS: Jenny Phabmixay, PharmD, BCPS, Anna Marceau, PharmD, Jessica Berei, PharmD; Asheville VA: Tim Burns, PharmD, Kara Harris, PharmD, Margaret Lowery, PharmD; Philadelphia VA: Namrata Patel, PharmD, Himayapsill Batista Quevedo, PharmD, Adina Klingman, PharmD; Portland VA: Kimberly MacKay, PharmD, Jason Doctor, PharmD Candidate, Kenny Duong, PharmD Candidate; Roseburg VA: Kristen Bossert, PharmD, Julie Rodgers, PharmD, Brielle Meeds, PharmD Candidate; Reno VA: Kimberly Jacques, PharmD, Steve Flynn, PharmD, Nhien Nguyen, PharmD; Saginaw VA: Jim Lile, PharmD, Iva Keene, PharmD; St. Cloud VA: Jessica Trompeter, PharmD, McKenzie Moore, PharmD; St. Louis VA: Danielle Skouby, PharmD; San Francisco VA: Kandise Buie, PharmD, Michele Walker, PharmD, Jana Shults, PharmD, Michelle Rushano, PharmD, Theora Canonica, PharmD; San Antonio VA: Lindsey Lu, PharmD, Manuel Escobar, PharmD; Tampa VA: Amanda Mercurio, PharmD, John Toney, MD, Marissa Sodhi, RN; West Haven VA: Ann Freeland Fisher, MD, Brian Kotansky, PharmD, Kristin Carr, PharmD; White City VA: Thy Vu, PharmD; Wilkes Barre VA: Jill O’Donnell, PharmD, BCPS, Carina Shults, PharmD. Collaborators are listed by VA membership at the time of participation, and some collaborators may no longer be practicing at affiliated locations.

References

Simmering, JE, Tang, F, Cavanaugh, et al. The increase in hospitalizations for urinary tract infections and the associated costs in the United States, 1998–2011. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017;4:ofw281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/threats-report/2019-ar-threats-report-508.pdf. Published 2019. Accessed September 19, 2022.Google Scholar
Healthy people 2030. US Department of Health and Human Services Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion website. https://health.gov/healthypeople. Published August 2020. Accessed August 20, 2021.Google Scholar
Kelly, AA, Jones, MM, Echevarria, KL, et al. A report of the efforts of the Veterans’ Health Administration National Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiative. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:513520.Google Scholar
Suda, KJ, Hicks, LA, Roberts, RM, et al. Antibiotic expenditures by medication, class, and healthcare setting in the United States, 2010–2015. Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:185190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez, GV, Fleming-Dutra, KE, Roberts, RM, et al. Core elements of outpatient antibiotic stewardship. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65(6):112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, K, Hooton, TM, Naber, KG, et al. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: a 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:e103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolle, LE, Gupta, K, Bradley, SF, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria: 2019 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2019;68:16111615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooton, TM. Acute simple cystitis in men. UpToDate website. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/acute-simple-cystitis-in-men. Updated July 20, 2020. Accessed June 22, 2021.Google Scholar
Hooton, TM, Gupta, K. Acute complicated urinary tract infection (including pyelonephritis) in adults. UpToDate website. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/acute-complicated-urinary-tract-infection-including-pyelonephritis-in-adults. Updated March 19, 2021. Accessed June 22, 2021.Google Scholar
Fosse, PE, Brinkman, KM, Brink, HM, Conner, CE, Aden, JK, Giancola, SE. Comparing outcomes among outpatients treated for pyelonephritis with oral cephalosporins versus first-line agents. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2022;59:106560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, MT, Melia, MT, Same, RG, Conley, AT, Tamma, PD. A seven-day course of TMP-SMX may be as effective as a seven-day course of ciprofloxacin for the treatment of pyelonephritis. Am J Med 2017;130:842845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA updates warnings for oral and injectable fluoroquinolone antibiotics due to disabling side effects. US Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-fda-updates-warnings-oral-and-injectable-fluoroquinolone-antibiotics. Updated December 20, 2018. Accessed June 21, 2021.Google Scholar
Kulchavenya, E. The best rules for antimicrobial stewardship in urogenital tract infections. Curr Opin Urol 2020;30:838844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spivak, ES, Burk, M, Zhang, R, et al. Management of bacteriuria in Veterans’ Affairs hospitals. Clin Infect Dis 2017;65:910917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, R, Deebel, N, Casals, R, et al. A new gold rush: a review of current and developing diagnostic tools for urinary tract infections. Diagnostics 2021;11:479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, RM, Kirkham, JJ, Mason, JR, et al. Development and interrater reliability of the Liverpool adverse drug reaction causality assessment tool. PLoS One 2011;6:e28096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, RH, Shapiro, ED, Vincent, TA, et al. Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of urinary tract infection. Clin Infect Dis 1992;15:S216S227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piraux, A, Faure, S, Naber, KG, Alidjanov, JF, Ramond-Roquin, A. Changes in the management of urinary tract infections in women: impact of the new recommendations on antibiotic prescribing behavior in France, between 2014 and 2019. BMC Health Serv Res 2021;21:612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langner, JL, Chiang, KF, Stafford, RS. Current prescribing practices and guideline concordance for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;225:272.e1272.e11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talan, DA, Takhar, SS, Krishnadasan, A, et al. Emergence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase urinary tract infections among hospitalized emergency department patients in the United States. Ann Emerg Med 2021;77:3243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linsenmeyer, K, Strymish, J, Gupta, K. Two simple rules for improving the accuracy of empiric treatment of multidrug-resistant urinary tract infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015;59:75937596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, K, Bhadelia, N. Management of urinary tract infections from multidrug-resistant organisms. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2014;28:4959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foxman, B. Editorial commentary: extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Escherichia coli in the United States: time to rethink empirical treatment for suspected E. coli infections? Clin Infect Dis 2013;56:649651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, L, Sabel, A, Burman, WJ, et al. Emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in outpatient urinary Escherichia coli isolates. Am J Med 2008;121:876884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colgan, R, Johnson, JR, Kuskowski, M, Gupta, K. Risk factors for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance in patients with acute uncomplicated cystitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52:846851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VHA Handbook 1058.05, VHA operations activities that may constitute research. Veterans’ Health Administration website. www.research.va.gov/resources/policies/oro-120811.cfm. Accessed June 4, 2021.Google Scholar
Moore, DS, Notz, WI, Flinger, MA. The Basic Practice of Statistics, Sixth Edition. New York: WH Freeman; 2013:138.Google Scholar
Germanos, GJ, Trautner, BW, Zoorob, RJ, et al. No clinical benefit to treating male urinary tract infection longer than seven days: an outpatient database study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2019;6:ofz216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drekonja, DM, Trautner, B, Amundson, C, Kuskowski, M, Johnson, JR. Effect of 7 vs 14 days of antibiotic therapy on resolution of symptoms among afebrile men with urinary tract infection: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;326:324331.Google ScholarPubMed
Buehrle, DJ, Wagener, MM, Clancy, CJ. Outpatient fluoroquinolone prescription fills in the United States, 2014 to 2020: assessing the impact of Food and Drug Administration safety warnings. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2021;65:e0015121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooton, TM, Roberts, PL, Stapleton, AE. Cefpodoxime vs ciprofloxacin for short-course treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis: a randomized trial. JAMA 2012;307:583589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madaras-Kelly, K, Hostler, C, Townsend, M, et al. Impact of implementation of the core elements of outpatient antibiotic stewardship within Veterans’ Health Administration Emergency Department and Primary Care Clinics on Antibiotic Prescribing and Patient Outcomes. Clin Infect Dis 2021;73:e1126e1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Flow diagram of outpatient UTI treatment medication utilization review. (A) Criteria are not mutually exclusive. (B) Preferred duration was further identified in 2,831 cases (eg, externally filled prescriptions with only antibiotic selection identified).

Figure 1

Table 1. Characteristics of Patient Cases Meeting Utilization Review Criteria

Figure 2

Table 2. Clinical Outcomes for Patients Who Received Preferred or Nonpreferred Outpatient UTI Treatment

Figure 3

Table 3. Clinical Outcomes for Patient Cases with Acute Cystitis and Pyelonephritis by Antibiotic Class

Supplementary material: File

Rovelsky et al. supplementary material

Rovelsky et al. supplementary material

Download Rovelsky et al. supplementary material(File)
File 318.8 KB