Antibiotic prescribing for older adults (aged ≥65 years) in outpatient settings accounts for a large proportion of antibiotic use, with a prescribing rate of 1,115 prescriptions per 1,000 persons in 2014. Reference Kabbani, Palms, Bartoces, Stone and Hicks1 A better understanding of patient characteristics associated with antibiotic prescribing is important to identify potential opportunities to improve prescribing practices and reduce inequities in patient care. We examined antibiotic prescribing by self-reported sociodemographic and health characteristics among Medicare Fee-for-Service (those enrolled in Part A and Part B) and Part D beneficiaries during 2007–2013 and 2016–2018.
Methods
Linked administrative claims data with data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a cross-sectional in-person national household survey of the US civilian, noninstitutionalized population, were used. 2 The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Research Ethics Review Board approved NHIS data collection and data linkage. The NCHS Data Linkage Program linked eligible NHIS respondents with the same individuals in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare enrollment and Part D prescription drug event (PDE) files during 2007–2018, based on the respondent providing consent and sufficient identifying information. Linkage-eligibility rates among respondents aged ≥65 years ranged from 48% to 88%, and match rates ranged from 90% to 96% for the study period. 3 Part D PDE files were not linked in 2014–2015, so these years are excluded from the analysis.
The binary outcome variable was defined as any filled antibiotic prescription (vs none) in the PDE file during the respondent’s NHIS interview year. Predictor variables included demographic (ie, sex, age group, race and ethnicity, marital status, and education), health-related (ie, health status and multiple chronic conditions [MCCs]), geographic (ie, urbanicity and region), and socioeconomic characteristics (ie, imputed income-to-poverty ratio, ability to afford prescription drugs in the past 12 months, Medicare and Medicaid dual eligibility, and low-income subsidy status), and survey year. All variables were self-reported except for dual eligibility, low-income subsidy status, and MCC; all were obtained from the CMS data. MCC included 15 conditions consistent with the Health and Human Services MCC list using an approach applied in the published literature. Reference Goodman, Posner, Huang, Parekh and Koh4
Analyses were limited to linked survey respondents aged >65 years at the time of their interview with complete data across all model variables and continuous enrollment for Part A, Part B, and Part D during the survey calendar year who had at least 1 PDE claim, so their full-year drug use could be observed. We excluded those without any claims because the Part D data do not differentiate between whether the beneficiary never received a prescription, chose not to fill, or filled their prescriptions in ways that were not captured in the data. 5 During 2007–2013 and 2016–2018, 60,918 adults aged >65 years were interviewed, 39,477 were matched with CMS data, 13,672 adults were continuously enrolled in Part D and Medicare fee-for-service, and 12,987 had any PDE claims (Fig. 1). All analyses accounted for the survey’s multistage, complex sampling design and used linkage-eligible adjusted weights. Survey sample weights were adjusted for linkage eligibility (nonresponse). 2
Figure 1. Flowchart of analytic sample among NHIS respondents with Medicare enrollment, 2007–2013 and 2016–2018. Note. CMS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; FFS, fee for service; PDE, prescription drug event. *Excludes NHIS data from 2014–2015 because these were not linked with PDE data files. †NHIS respondents aged >65 years and were enrolled continuously for 12 months in the Master Beneficiary Summary File for Part A and Part B during the calendar year of their survey interview. §NHIS respondents aged >65 years and were enrolled continuously for 12 months in Part D during the calendar year of their survey interview. SOURCE: National Center for Health Statistics, National Health Interview Survey, 2007–2013 and 2016–2018, linked to Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, 2007–2013 and 2016–2018.
We examined patients’ characteristics and assessed their associations with receiving an antibiotic prescription using a logistic regression model. We tested interaction terms between ability to afford prescription medications and race and ethnicity and ability to afford prescription medications and multiple chronic conditions because antibiotic prescribing may vary by these variables; these results were statistically insignificant and were not included. Reference Fleming-Dutra, Shapiro, Hicks, Gerber and Race6,Reference Haviland, Elliott, Weech-Maldonado, Hambarsoomian, Orr and Hays7 Due to multicollinearity, imputed income-to-poverty ratio and low-income subsidy variables were removed from the model. Analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) and SAS-callable SUDAAN version 11.0 software (RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC).
Results
Individual characteristics and adjusted odds ratios are shown in the Table 1. Part D beneficiaries with any PDE claims were overall more likely to live in urban areas, to be female, to be non-Hispanic White, to have self-reported excellent or very good/good health status, and to have ≤3 chronic conditions. Characteristics associated with any antibiotic prescribing included female versus male sex (1.31; 95% CI, 1.21–1.48), being married versus not married (1.18; 95% CI, 1.07–1.31), with fair or poor health status vs. excellent or very good/good (1.19; 95% CI, 1.05–1.34), >1 chronic condition versus 0 or 1 (2–3 conditions, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.16–1.49; 4–5 conditions, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.58–2.07; ≥6 conditions, 3.13; 95% CI, 2.62–3.74), reside in the Southern region versus the Northeast (1.18; 95% CI, 1.03–1.36), and unable to afford prescription drugs (1.41; 95% CI, 1.11–1.79). Non-Hispanic Black adults (0.61; 95% CI, 0.51–0.87) and non-Hispanic Asian adults (0.65; 95% CI, 0.49–0.87) were less likely to receive an antibiotic prescription compared to non-Hispanic White adults.
Table 1. Selected Characteristics of US Adults (aged >65 years) with Medicare Part D and Associations with Antibiotic Prescribing, United States, 2007–2013 and 2016–2018
Note. aOR, adjusted odds ratio; PDE, prescription drug event; Ref, referent category.
All variables are from NHIS except for dual eligibility, low-income subsidy, multiple chronic conditions, and outcomes, which are from the Medicare claims data.
Interaction terms were not statistically significant, so they were not included in the model (affordability and multiple chronic conditions, P = .058, affordability and race and ethnicity, P = .746).
Variables included in the model include those with corresponding aORs. Models also adjusted for survey year. SOURCE: National Center for Health Statistics, National Health Interview Survey, 2007–2013 and 2016–2018 linked to Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, 2007–2013 and 2016–2018.
a PDE for antibiotics versus none.
b Weighted estimates and adjusted for complex survey design.
c Complete case analysis was used for the logistic regression model, so sample size does not match the figure in the supplement.
d Includes separated, divorced, widowed, and never married.
e These included hypertension, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, cardiac arrhythmias, hyperlipidemia, stroke, arthritis, asthma, cancer (female breast cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer), chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, depression, diabetes, and osteoporosis.
Discussion
We used a unique data set with self-reported demographic and socioeconomic characteristics linked to claims data to characterize antibiotic prescribing among US older adults with Medicare Part D. Although the population had continuous healthcare coverage, this analysis shows variation in antibiotic prescribing among older adults by race and ethnicity, sex, geography, and health status. Prior research has shown that Black children were less likely to receive antibiotics than White children, Reference Fleming-Dutra, Shapiro, Hicks, Gerber and Race6 and similar findings have been described among older adults inappropriately prescribed an antibiotic for COVID-19. Reference Tsay, Bartoces, Gouin, Kabbani and Hicks8 This analysis shows that non-Hispanic Black older adults were less likely to receive antibiotics, which may represent a health inequity warranting further study. Women and people with MCCs were more likely to be prescribed antibiotics, which may reflect more need for antibiotics, healthcare-seeking behavior, or healthcare exposure. Higher antibiotic prescribing rates in the South have also been described in the literature and these geographic variations persisted after adjusting for other characteristics. Reference Zhang, Steinman and Kaplan9 The inability to afford prescription drugs was also associated with more prescribing, which may reflect delayed care or potential higher severity of illness.
Limitations include a small sample size, linkage eligibility, and pooled cross-sectional data limiting the evaluation of cumulative antibiotic prescribing, prescribing appropriateness, or trends over time. However, we used self-reported sociodemographic data often unavailable in other commonly used data sources. Although CMS administrative data include imputed race and ethnicity, analyses are often restricted to White and Black persons because of the low validity of other race and ethnicity categories. Reference Jarrín, Nyandege, Grafova, Dong and Lin10 We assumed that survey responses applied to the entire period, regardless of when the interview occurred; this may not reflect an individual’s situation, particularly if interviewed earlier in the calendar year. We included respondents with any claim but did not capture those who may have received a prescription that was not filled or was filled in ways not captured in the data. Only 5% of those fully enrolled in Part D did not have a claim. We did not analyze condition-specific prescribing by outpatient visits to observe overall associations of prescribing in the older adult population, limiting comparisons with other studies on condition-specific prescribing. Medicare claims data do not capture free and low-cost medications, 5 which may attenuate the effect of self-reported inability to afford prescription drugs. Our model used a control for dual eligibility, which may account for some confounding by socioeconomic status. Finally, our study population was limited to the civilian noninstitutionalized population with Part D coverage and may not be representative of all Medicare beneficiaries.
This analysis shows variation in antibiotic prescribing by patient characteristics in older adults with continuous access to health insurance and prescription drug coverage during the study period. Future analyses may consider the evaluation of prescribing appropriateness, and this data set could be used to explore complex health-equity questions for common health conditions in older adults. Efforts to improve antibiotic prescribing quality for older adults should incorporate a health-equity lens to ameliorate rather than exacerbate disparities.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Lindsey Black, Crescent Martin, Lisa Mirel, and Benjamin Zablotsky from the National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Financial support
No funding external to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was provided for this study.
Competing interests
All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
Open access
