Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T14:18:17.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Two Faces of Parrhêsia: Free Speech and Self-Expression in Ancient Greece*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

David Konstan
David Konstan*
Affiliation:
New York State State University/Brown University, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Parrhêsia has been understood as a right under the Athenian democracy, roughly equivalent to the right of free speech in modern democracies, including the privilege of speaking in the assembly. In this paper, I argue that the notion of ‘rights’ is anachronistic in this connection; more particularly, parrhêsia was less a right than an expectation, the idea that one might freely express even unpopular opinions without fear of repression. But unpopular opinions might run athwart notions of public decency, and free expression might tilt over into license or shamelessness. Examples are given of how Athenian discourse, in tragedy (especially Euripides' Phoenician Women) and oratory, negotiated the delicate balance between forthrightness and insolence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 46 , 2012 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was delivered as the keynote address at the thirty-third annual conference of The Australasian Society for Classical Studies, held in Melbourne on 4-9 February 2012. I am immensely grateful to the organisers of the conference: the President of the Society, John Davidson; the Program Co-Ordinator, Bruce Marshall; and the Convenor, Eva Anagnostou-Laoutides. I wish to express my thanks as well to the colleagues and students who made the occasion such a splendid one, intellectually and collegially.

References

Adkins, A.W.H. (1978). ‘Review of Dover 1974’, CPA 73, 143-58.Google Scholar
Arnott, W.G. (1991). ‘A Lesson from the Frogs’, G&R 38,18–23.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David and Ponczoch, Joseph A. (2011). ‘[Philodemus] On Wealth (PHerc. 1570 Cols. VI-XX, PCC. 4-6A): 'New Fragments of Empedocles, Menander, and Epicurus’, Cronache Ercolanesi 41, 95–136.Google Scholar
Balot, Ryan (2004). ‘Free Speech, Courage, and Democratic Deliberation’, in Sluiter, Ineke and Rosen, Ralph M. (eds), Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Leiden, Brill, 221–59.Google Scholar
Carter, D.M. (2004). ‘Citizen Attribute, Negative Right: A Conceptual Difference between Ancient and Modern Ideas of Freedom of Speech’, in Sluiter, and Rosen, , 197–220.Google Scholar
Diggle, James (ed.) (1994). Euripidis fabulae. Vol. 3. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Foucalt, Michel (2001). Fearless Speech. (Los Angeles, Semiotext(e) 12). Available on line under the title Discourse and Truth: tAe Problematization of Parrhesia. Six Lectures Given by Michel Foucault at the University of California at Berkeley, Oct-Nov. 1983 (ed. Pearson, Joseph) at http://foucault.info/documents/parrhesia.Google Scholar
Green, Jeffrey (2005). ‘The Shame of Being a Philosopher: Critical Response to Tarnopolsky’, Political TAeory 33, 266-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, David (1997). Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, David, Clay, Diskin, Glad, Clarence, Thorn, Johan and Ware, James, transl. (1998). Philodemus On Frank Criticism: Introduction, Translation and Notes. Atlanta, Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Mastronarde, Donald J. (ed.) (1994). Euripides: Phoenissae. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitsis, Phillip (2006). ‘The Stoic Origin of Natural Rights’, in Anagnostopoulos, Georgios (ed.), Law and RigAts in the Ancient Greek Tradition. Supplementary Volume of PhilosopAical Inquiry, 173-99.Google Scholar
Momigliano, Arnaldo (1973). ‘Freedom of Speech in Antiquity’, in Wiener, P.P. (ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas. Vol. 2, 252-63. New York.Google Scholar
Mulhern, J.J. (2004). ‘Parrhêsia in Aristotle’, in Sluiter, and Rosen, , 313-39.Google Scholar
Roisman, Joseph (2004). ‘Speaker-Audience Interaction in Athens: A Power Struggle’, in Sluiter, and Rosen, , 261-78.Google Scholar
Sayare, Scott (2011a). ‘French Provocateur Enters Battle Over Comments’, New York Times, 12 February 2011, A5.Google Scholar
Sayare, Scott (2011b). “Commentator Convicted for Inciting Racial Bias’, New York Times, 19 February 2011.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, Arlene (2006). Free Speech and Democracy in Ancient Athens. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarnopolsky, Christina H. (2005). “Reply to Green’, Political Theory 33, 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarnopolsky, Christina H. (2010). Prudes, Perverts, and Tyrants: Plato's Gorgias and the Politics of Shame. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar