Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:44:28.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sideshadowing Actium: Counterfactual History in Lollius’ Naumachia (Horace, Epistles 1.18)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2018

Robert Cowan*
Affiliation:
The University of [email protected]

Abstract

Among the personal hobbies which Horace recommends his young friend Lollius conduct at a discreet distance from his potens amicus is the re-enactment of the battle of Actium, which should only be undertaken in the privacy of his father’s estate. Critics have noted that the potential offence in this seemingly affirmative celebration of the ‘miracle of Actium’ lies in the casting of Lollius’ brother as his opponent, thus acknowledging the civil nature of the battle which was at least downplayed, if not elided, in official discourse. They have overlooked, however, the further subversive element in Horace’s reference to ‘whichever of the two (alterutrum)’ Victory crowns. This presents the counterfactual possibility, both in the Epistle and in the naumachia which serves as a parallel mimesis, that Antony might have won the battle of Actium. This instance of ‘sideshadowing’ demands to be set in a number of contexts, such as the use of counterfactuals in historiographical depictions of battles and the phenomenon whereby some public naumachiae had outcomes contrary to that of the historical battle they were re-enacting. In particular, the very possibility of an Antonian victory renders the Augustan principate contingent, in opposition to the providential, teleological inevitability with which it, and especially its foundational battle, were depicted elsewhere in Augustan poetry. Such an interpretation is supported by Lucan’s allusion to this passage in his Dyrrachium episode, the only other non-Lucretian instance of alterutrum in extant Latin poetry.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article had its origins in a discussion during a 2012 Latin Republican Poetry class at the University of Sydney, and a version was delivered to the Augustus from a Distance conference, also at USyd, in September 2014. My thanks to all who contributed to the argument’s development in these and other contexts, especially Chris Stait, Thomas Wilson, Kathryn Welch, Bronwyn Hopwood, the late Martin Stone, Elly Cowan, Antichthon’s editor, Art Pomeroy, and its anonymous readers.

References

Ahl, F. M. (1984), ‘The Rider and the Horse: Politics and Power in Roman Poetry from Horace to Statius’, ANRW 2.32.1, 40-124.Google Scholar
Asso, P. (2008), ‘The Intrusive Trope: Apostrophe in Lucan’, MD 61, 161-173.Google Scholar
Basto, R. (1982), ‘Horace’s Propempticon to Vergil: A Re-Examination’, Vergilius 28, 30-43.Google Scholar
Berlan-Bajard, A. (2006), Les spectacles aquatiques romains. Rome.Google Scholar
Bernstein, M. A. (1994), Foregone Conclusions: Against Apocalyptic History. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Borzsák, I. (1978), ‘Lucan und Horaz’, ACD 14, 43-49.Google Scholar
Bowditch, L. (1994), ‘Horace’s Poetics of Political Integrity: Epistle 1.18’, AJPh 115, 409-426.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. (ed.) (2000), Virtuelle Antike: Wendepunkte der Alten Geschichte. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1984), ‘Propertius and the Battle of Actium’, in T. Woodman and D. West (eds.), Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. 129-168. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Churchill, W. S. (1931), ‘If Lee Had Not Won the Battle of Gettysburg’, in J. C. Squire (ed.), If It Had Happened Otherwise: Lapses into Imaginary History. 173-196. London.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2000/1), ‘The Memory of Philippi in Horace and the Interpretation of Epistle 1.20.23’, CJ 96, 27-56.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. (1990), ‘Fatal Charades: Roman Executions Staged as Mythological Enactments’, JRS 80, 44-73.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. (1993), ‘Launching into History: Aquatic Displays in the Early Empire’, JRS 83, 48-74.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. (ed.) (2006), Martial: Liber Spectaculorum. Oxford.Google Scholar
Commager, S. (1962), The Odes of Horace: A Critical Study. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Cook, T. F. Jr. (1999), ‘Our Midway Disaster: Japan Springs a Trap, June 4, 1942’, in R. Cowley (ed.), What If?: The World’s Foremost Military Historians Imagine What Might Have Been. 311-339. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. (2010), ‘Virtual Epic: Counterfactuals, Sideshadowing, and the Poetics of Contingency in the Punica ’, in A. Augoustakis (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Silius Italicus. 323-351. Leiden.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro Behr, F. (2007), Feeling History: Lucan, Stoicism, and the Poetics of Passion. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Davis, G. (1991), Polyhymnia: The Rhetoric of Horatian Lyric Discourse. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Dilke, O. A. W. (ed.) (1954), Horace: Epistles, Book I . London.Google Scholar
Dionigi, I. (1997), ‘Lucrezio’, in Enciclopedia Oraziana, vol. 2. 15-22. Rome.Google Scholar
Dodge, H. (2011), Spectacle in the Roman World. London.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1991), The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ferri, R. (1993), I dispiaceri di un epicureo: Uno studio sulla poetica oraziana delle Epistole. Pisa.Google Scholar
Flower, M. A. and Marincola, J. (eds.) (2002), Herodotus: Histories, Book IX . Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1957), Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (1996), Augustan Culture. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Garello, F. (2004), ‘Sport or Showbiz? The Naumachiae of Imperial Rome’, in S. Bell, and G. Davies (eds.), Games and Festivals in Classical Antiquity. 115-124. Oxford.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (1995), Epic in Republican Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (2002), ‘Blind Eyes and Cut Throats: Amnesia and Silence in Horace Satires 1.7’, CPh 97, 145-161.Google Scholar
Groß, D. (2013), Plenus litteris Lucanus: Zur Rezeption der horazischen Oden und Epoden in Lucans Bellum Civile. Rahden/Westfalen.Google Scholar
Gurval, R. A. (1995), Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Hanson, V. D. (2006), ‘A Stillborn West? Themistocles at Salamis, 480 bc ’, in P. E. Tetlock, R. N. Lebow, and G. Parker (eds.), Unmaking the West: What-If? Scenarios That Rewrite World History. 47-89. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1986), Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium . Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (2009), Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hartmann, L. (1913), De pugna Actiaca a poetis Augusteae aetatis celebrata. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1987), ‘Lucan/The Word at War’, Ramus 16, 122-164.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (1984), ‘Actium und Salamis’, JDAI 99, 187-214.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1985), ‘Horace on Friendship and Free Speech (Epistles 1.18 and Satires 1.4)’, Hermes 113, 480-490.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. (ed.) (2006), Propertius: Elegies, Book IV . Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. (2007), ‘Propertius 4.10 and the End of the Aeneid: Augustus, the Spolia Opima and the Right to Remain Silent’, G&R 54, 61-81.Google Scholar
Keegan, J. (1999), ‘How Hitler Could Have Won the War: The Drive for the Middle East, 1941’, in R. Cowley (ed.), What If?: The World’s Foremost Military Historians Imagine What Might Have Been. 295-305. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Kießling, A. and Heinze, R. (eds.) (1914), Q. Horatius Flaccus: Briefe. 4th edn. Berlin.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1995), ‘Patrons and Friends’, CPh 90, 328-342.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2002), ‘Das Problem der amicitia in der 18. Epistel des Horaz’, Hermes 130, 81-99.Google Scholar
Lange, C. H. (2009), Res publica constituta: Actium, Apollo, and the Accomplishment of the Triumviral Assignment . Leiden.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (1997), Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (1997), Horace’s Narrative Odes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Macleod, C. W. (1976), ‘Callimachus, Virgil, Propertius, and Lollius (Horace, Epistles 1.18.39-66)’, ZPE 23, 41-43.Google Scholar
Macleod, C. W. (1979), ‘The Poetry of Ethics: Horace, Epistles I’, JRS 69, 16-27.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (1997), Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marks, R. (2008), ‘Augustus and I: Horace and “Horatian” Identity in Odes 3.14’, AJPh 129, 77-100.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. (ed.) (1994), Horace: Epistles, Book I . Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mette, H. J. (1961), ‘ Genus tenue und mensa tenuis bei Horaz’, MH 18, 136-139.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (2004), ‘Propertian Reception of Virgil’s Actian Apollo’, MD 52, 73-84.Google Scholar
Morello, R. (2002), ‘Livy’s Alexander Digression (9.17-19): Counterfactuals and Apologetics’, JRS 92, 62-85.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (2005), ‘A Yoke Connecting Baskets: Odes 3.14, Hercules, and Italian Unity’, CQ 55, 190-203.Google Scholar
Morson, G. (1994), Narrative and Freedom: The Shadows of Time. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. (1992), Ungeschehenes Geschehen: Beinahe-Episoden im griechischen und römischen Epos von Homer bis zur Spätantike. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, E. (2006), ‘Alternative Empires: Tacitus’s Virtual History of the Pisonian Principate’, Arethusa 39, 281-301.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (1998), Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. (2006), Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pagán, V. E. (2002), ‘Actium and Teutoburg: Augustan Victory and Defeat in Vergil and Tacitus’, in D. S. Levene, and D. P. Nelis (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. 45-59. Leiden.Google Scholar
Paladini, M. L. (1958), A proposito della tradizione poetica sulla battaglia di Azio. Brussels.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.) (1988), Plutarch: Life of Antony. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Porter, D. H. (2002), ‘Playing the Game: Horace, Epistles 1’, CW 96, 21-60.Google Scholar
Pöschl, V. (1968), ‘Die Kleopatraode des Horaz (c. 1,37)’, in H. Krefeld (ed.), Interpretationen lateinischer Schulautoren mit einer didaktischen Einführung. 106-137. Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
Préaux, J. (ed.) (1968), Q. Horatius Flaccus, Epistulae: Liber primus. Édition, introduction et commentaire . Paris.Google Scholar
Quint, D. (1993), Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Reckford, K. J. (2002), ‘ Pueri ludentes: Some Aspects of Play and Seriousness in Horace’s Epistles ’, TAPhA 132, 1-19.Google Scholar
Rohdich, H. (1972), ‘Die 18. Epistel des Horaz’, RhM 115, 261-288.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (2001), Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Schenk, P. (1984), Die Gestalt des Turnus in Vergils Aeneis. Königstein.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. (1995), ‘“Vornehm par excellence”: Über Noblesse und Takt in Horazens Philippi-Gedichten (Epode 13 – Ode 2,7 – Ode 3,14)’, WS 108, 377-396.Google Scholar
Sonnabend, H. (2000), ‘Augustus – wird nicht alt’, in K. Brodersen (ed.), Virtuelle Antike: Wendepunkte der Alten Geschichte. 103-115. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. (1985), Propertius: ‘Love’ and ‘War’: Individual and State under Augustus. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Starr, R. (1987), ‘The Circulation of Literary Texts in the Roman World’, CQ 37, 213-223.Google Scholar
Strauss, B. (2006), ‘The Resilient West: Salamis without Themistocles, Classical Greece without Salamis, and the West without Classical Greece’, in P. E. Tetlock, R. N. Lebow, and G. Parker (eds.), Unmaking the West: What-If? Scenarios That Rewrite World History . 90-118. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (1997), ‘Am Scheideweg zur Zukunft: Alternative Geschehensverläufe bei römischen Historikern’, Gymnasium 104, 36-54.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (1998), ‘ Si fata paterentur: Gedanken an alternatives Handeln in Vergils Aeneis ’, in A.-I. Radke (ed.), Candide iudex: Beiträge zur augusteischen Dichtung. Festschrift für Walter Wimmel zum 75. Geburtstag . 353-374. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Sutherland, E. (2002), Horace’s Well-Trained Reader: Toward a Methodology of Audience Participation in the Odes. Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
Tesoriero, C. (2004), ‘The Middle of Lucan’, in S. Kyriakidis and F. De Martino (eds.), Middles in Latin Poetry. 183-215. Bari.Google Scholar
Toynbee, A. (2000), ‘Alexander der Grosse – wird alt’, in K. Brodersen (ed.), Virtuelle Antike: Wendepunkte der Alten Geschichte. 43-102. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Watson, L. C. (2003), A Commentary on Horace’s Epodes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Welch, K. (2012), Magnus Pius: Sextus Pompeius and the Transformation of the Roman Republic. Swansea.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1988), The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, trans. A. Shapiro. Ann Arbor, MI (originally: Augustus und die Macht der Bilder. Munich, 1987).Google Scholar