Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:48:16.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Showing Rome in the Round: Reinterpreting the ‘Commemorative Medallions’ of Antoninus Pius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2015

Clare Rowan
Clare Rowan*
Affiliation:
The University of Warwick
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article re-examines the ‘commemorative medallions’ of Antoninus Pius, a series of medallions showing the early history of Rome. It is suggested that these pieces should be seen not in a Saecular Games context but as a continuation of Hadrianic precedent, probably connected with the construction of the Temple of Venus and Rome. These medallions represent a wider imperial emphasis on the distant past under both Hadrian and Antoninus Pius, an interest that we observe in other coin types, public building works and perhaps also works of literature. A detailed examination of these Pius medallions reveals that their iconography was drawn from earlier types, and that they in turn inspired later imagery. This phenomenon reveals a certain intertextuality in numismatic language, and suggests that coin imagery did not merely grace Rome’s currency, but was recorded and was accessible to later generations. These medallions, truly ‘monuments in miniature’, reveal a new understanding of Pius’ reign and his (self-)presentation as Hadrian’s successor.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 48 , 2014 , pp. 109 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barenghi, F. (1992), ‘Scene leggendarie della storia di Roma su alcuni medaglioni a proposito del medaglione di Enea a Anchise’, Rivista Italiana di Numismatica e Scienze Affini 94, 113-20.Google Scholar
Belloni, G.G. (1989), ‘Celebrazioni epiche in medaglioni di Antonino Pio. Una pagina di cultura erudita’, Serta Historica Antiqua II, 191–205.Google Scholar
Boatwright, M. (1987), Hadrian and the City of Rome. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boatwright, M. (2010), ‘Antonine Rome: Security in the Homeland’, in Ewald, B. and Noreña, C. (eds), The Emperor and Rome, 169-97. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Börner, S. (2012), Marc Aurel im Spiegel seiner Münzen und Medaillons: eine vergleichende Analyse der stadtrömischen Prägungen zwischen 138 und 180 n. Chr. Bonn.Google Scholar
Chueng, A. (1998), ‘The Political Significance of Roman Imperial Coin Types’, Schweizer Münzblätter 191, 53–61.Google Scholar
Clay, C.L. (1976), ‘Roman Imperial Medallions: The Date and Purpose of their Issue’, in Cahn, H.A. and Rider, G.L. (eds), Actes du 8th Congrès International de Numismatique, 253-65. Paris.Google Scholar
Eremić, D. (2014), ‘Coin Finds beyond the Danube: Functions of Fourth Century Gold Coins within Barbarian Societies’, in Bokern, A. and Rowan, C. (eds), Embodying Value: The Transformation of Objects in and from the Ancient World, 121-30. Oxford.Google Scholar
Frœhner, W. (1878), Les médaillons de l’empire romain. Paris.Google Scholar
Gagé, J. (1936), ‘Le «templum urbis» et les origines de l’idée de «renovatio»‘, in Mélanges Franz Cumont, Annuaire de l’Institut de philologie et d’histoire orientales et slaves 4, 151-87. Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Geissen, A. (1982), ‘Mythos und Münze. Das Motiv der Erlösung auf zwei Grossbronzen des Antoninus Pius aus Alexandria’, in Hackens, T. and Weiller, R. (eds), Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Numismatics, 393-7. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Gnecchi, F. (1912), I medaglioni Romani. Vols 1-3. Milan.Google Scholar
Hill, P.V. (1984), ‘Buildings and Monuments of Rome on the Coins of the Second Century, AD 96-192’, Numismatic Chronicle 144, 33–51.Google Scholar
Holden, A. (2008), ‘The Abduction of the Sabine Women in Context: The Iconography on Late Antique Contorniate Medallions’, American Journal of Archaeology 112, 121-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurter, S. (1980), ‘Ein neuer Aureus des Caracalla’, Schweizer Münzblätter 117, 39–41.Google Scholar
Jenkins, M.R. (1988), ‘The ‘Aeneid’ Medallion – a Narrative Interpretation’, Numismatic Chronicle 148, 148-52.Google Scholar
Kaiser-Raiss, M.R. (1981), ‘Posthumous Hadrianic Medallions?’, American Numismatic Society Museum Notes 26, 187-94.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A.M. (2010), ‘Lucian, Fronto, and the Absence of Contemporary Historiography under the Antonines’, American Journal of Philology 131, 285–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, H. (1925), ‘Some Historical Coins of Hadrian’, Journal of Roman Studies 15, 209-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, H. (1930), The Roman Imperial Coinage III: Antoninus Pius to Commodus. London.Google Scholar
Milne, J.G. (1971), Catalogue of Alexandrian Coins. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mittag, P.F. (2010), Römische Medaillons. Caesar bis Hadrian. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Molinari, M.C. (2002), ‘Alcune riflessioni sui ritrovamenti di medaglioni e di grandi bronzi provinciali a Roma’, Rivista Italiana di Numismatica e Scienze Affini 103, 203-17.Google Scholar
Palombi, D. (2012), ‘Da Traiano a Marco Aurelio: la belle époque di Roma imperiale’, in La Rocca, E., Presicce, C. Parisi and Lo Monaco, A. (eds), L’età dell’equilibrio 98-180 d. C., 35–44. Rome.Google Scholar
Rémy, B. (2005), Antonin le Pieux 138-161. Fayard.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. (1989), ‘The Fate of an Architect: Apollodoros of Damascus’, Athenaeum 67, 551-66.Google Scholar
Rowan, C. (2012), Under Divine Auspices. Divine Ideology and the Visualisation of Imperial Power in the Severan Period. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rowan, C. (2013), ‘Imaging the Golden Age: The Coinage of Antoninus Pius’, Papers of the British School at Rome 81, 211-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindel, N. and Woytek, B. (2011), ‘Nero and the Making of the Roman Medallion’, Numismatic Chronicle 171, 109-20.Google Scholar
Snijder, G.S. (1940), ‘Kaiser Hadrian und der Tempel der Venus und Roma’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 55, 1–11.Google Scholar
Strack, P.L. (1937), Untersuchungen zur römischen Reichsprägung des zweiten Jahrhunderts III: Die Reichsprägung zur Zeit des Antoninus Pius. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. (2007), Monumentality and the Roman Empire: Architecture in the Antonine Age. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toynbee, J.M.C. (1925), ‘Some ‘Programme’ Coin-Types of Antoninus Pius’, Classical Review 39, 170-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toynbee, J.M.C. (1934), The Hadrianic School. A Chapter in the History of Greek Art. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Toynbee, J.M.C. (1942), ‘An Imperial Institute of Archaeology as Revealed by Roman Medallions’, The Archaeological Journal 99, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toynbee, J.M.C. (1944a), Roman Medallions. New York.Google Scholar
Toynbee, J.M.C. (1944b), ‘Roman Medallions: Their Scope and Purpose’, Numismatic Chronicle 4, 27–44.Google Scholar
Turcan, R. (1964), ‘La «fondation» du temple de Vénus et de Rome’, Latomus 23, 42–55.Google Scholar
Zelizer, V.A. (1994), The Social Meaning of Money. Pin Money, Paychecks, Poor Relief, and Other Currencies. Princeton.Google Scholar