Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:45:04.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rhythm of Love: Patterns of Perception and the Classical Profession of the Hetaira

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2019

David Hullinger
David Hullinger*
Affiliation:
The University of Southern [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For a long time, the classical profession of the hetaira, or paid female companion, has eluded definition. The hetaira has often been described as a ‘courtesan’ and her work as a ‘form of prostitution’, yet these appellatives often conflict with depictions of the hetaira by classical authors. Accordingly, in this article I will argue that the hetaira was perceived by the Greeks as an elite entertainer whose service of companionship emphasized flirtation and intimacy with a cultivated woman instead of the sale of sex. In order to demonstrate this understanding of the hetaira, I will cite evidence from a wide range of classical writings, particularly legal orations, and will ultimately propose that, when used to indicate a professional, the classical Greek term hetaira should be translated as ‘entertainer’.

Keywords

hetairasex workentertainmenterosClassical Greece
Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 53 , 2019 , pp. 79 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © The Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brulé, P. (2001), Women of Ancient Greece. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Cohen, E.E. (2015), Athenian Prostitution: The Business of Sex. New York.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. (1997), Courtesans & Fishcakes: The Consuming Passions of Classical Athens. New York.Google Scholar
Faraone, C.A. and McClure, L.K. (eds.) (2006), Prostitution and Courtesans in the Ancient World. Madison.Google Scholar
Garrison, D. (2000), Sexual Culture in Ancient Greece. Norman.Google Scholar
Gilhuly, K. (2007), ‘Bronze for Gold: Subjectivity in Lucian's “Dialogues of the Courtesans”’, AJPh 128, 59–94.Google Scholar
Just, R. (1989), Women in Athenian Law and Life. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, R.F. (2015), ‘Elite Citizen Women and the Origins of the Hetaira in Classical Athens’, Helios 42, 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keuls, E.C. (1985), The Reign of the Phallus: Sexual Politics in Ancient Athens. New York.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2015), Beauty: The Fortunes of an Ancient Greek Idea. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, D. (tr.) (1994), Euripides: Cyclops. Alcestis. Medea. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (1997), ‘Inventing the “Hetaira”: Sex, Politics, and Discursive Conflict in Archaic Greece’, ClAnt 16, 106–150.Google Scholar
Marchant, E.C. and Todd, O.J. (tr.) (2013), Xenophon: Memorabilia, Oeconomicus, Symposium, Apology. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McClure, L.K. (2003), Courtesans at Table: Gender and Greek Literary Culture in Athenaeus. New York.Google Scholar
Murray, A.T. (tr.) (1939), Demosthenes VI. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. (1975), Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity. New York.Google Scholar
Rackham, H. (tr.) (1932), Aristotle: Politics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reinsberg, C. (1989), Ehe, Hetärentum und Knabenliebe im Antiken Griechenland. München.Google Scholar
Sissa, G. (2003), Sex and Sensuality in the Ancient World. New Haven.Google Scholar