Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:17:01.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lucretian Reflections in Seneca's Trojan Women: The Function of the Second Choral Ode

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2015

John L. Penwill
John L. Penwill*
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Bendigo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The function of the second choral ode of Seneca's Trojan Women in the overall thematic design of that play is a question that has aroused much critical interest over the years. Its overt Epicureanism appears at first to sit oddly with the assumptions of various characters (including the Chorus themselves) as to whether individual consciousness survives after death, and its relationship to what precedes (Talthybius' report of the appearance of Achilles' ghost, the quarrel between Pyrrhus and Agamemnon and Calchas' injunction that both Polyxena and Astyanax must be sacrificed) and what follows (Andromache's dream of Hector) has been seen as problematic; further, there is the whole issue of how it relates to the ritual killings of Astyanax and Polyxena on which the play focuses so much attention and with which it concludes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 39 , 2005 , pp. 77 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amoroso, F. (1981), ‘Les Troyennes de Sénèque: dramaturgic et théâtralité’, in Zehnacker (1981), 81–96.Google Scholar
Aygon, J.-P. (2004), Pictor in fabula: L'ecphrasis-descriptio dans les tragédies de Sénèque. Brussels.Google Scholar
Bibauw, J. (ed.) (1969), Hommages à Marcel Renard, 3 vols. Brussels.Google Scholar
Billerbeck, M., and Schmidt, E.A. (eds) (2003), Sénèque le tragique (Fondation Hardt Entretiens sur l'Antiquité Classique 50). Vandoeuvres-Genève.Google Scholar
Bishop, J.D. (1972), ‘Seneca's Troades: Dissolution of a Way of Life’, RhM 115, 197–219.Google Scholar
Boella, U. (1979), ‘Osservazioni sulle “Troiane” di Seneca’, Rivista di Studi Classici 27, 66–79.Google Scholar
Boyle, A.J. (ed.) (1983), Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays on Senecan Drama. Berwick VIC.Google Scholar
Boyle, A.J. (ed.) (1994), Seneca's Troades. Leeds.Google Scholar
Boyle, A.J. (ed.) (1997), Tragic Seneca: An Essay in the Theatrical Tradition. London and New York.Google Scholar
Boyle, A.J. (ed.) (2006), Roman Tragedy, Abingdon and New York.Google Scholar
Calder, W.M. (1970), ‘Originality in Seneca's Troades’, CPh 65, 75–82.Google Scholar
Curley, T. (1986), The Nature of Senecan Drama. Rome.Google Scholar
Castagna, L. (ed.) (1996), Nove studi sui cori tragici di Seneca. Milan.Google Scholar
Caviglia, F. (ed.) (1981), L. Anneo Seneca: Le Troiane. Rome.Google Scholar
Davis, P.J. (1993), Shifting Song: The Chorus in Seneca's Tragedies. Hildesheim. Zürich and New York.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1982), Seneca's Troades: A Literary Introduction with Text, Translation and Commentary. Princeton.Google Scholar
Fitch, J.G. (1981), ‘Sense-Pauses and Relative Dating in Seneca, Sophocles and Shakespeare’, AJP 102, 289–307.Google Scholar
Fitch, J.G. (ed. and tr.) (2002), Seneca: Hercules, Trojan Women, Phoenician Women, Phaedra. Cambridge MA and London.Google Scholar
Garelli-François, M.-H. (1988), ‘Tradition littéraire et création dramatique dans les tragédies de Sénèque: l'exemple des rémits de messagers’, Latomus 57, 15–32.Google Scholar
Haywood, R.M. (1969), ‘The Poetry of the Choruses of Seneca's Troades’, in Bibauw (1969), i.415–420.Google Scholar
Henry, D., and Walker, B. (1985), The Mask of Power: Seneca's Tragedies and Imperial Rome. Warminster and Chicago.Google Scholar
Hine, H.M. (2003), ‘Interpretatio Stoica of Senecan Tragedy’, in Billerbeck and Schmidt (2003), 173–209.Google Scholar
Keulen, A.J. (2001), L. Annaeus Seneca Troades: Introduction, Text and Commentary. Leiden, Boston and Köln.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawall, G. (1982), ‘Death and Perspective in Seneca's Troades’, CJ 77, 244–252.Google Scholar
Littlewood, C.A.J. (2004), Self-Representation and Illusion in Senecan Tragedy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marino, R. (1996), ‘Il secondo coro delle Troades e il destino dell' anima dopo la morte’, in Castagna (1996), 57–73.Google Scholar
Mendell, C. (1941), Our Seneca. New Haven.Google Scholar
Motto, A.L., and Clark, J.R. (1988), Senecan Tragedy. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Owen, W.H. (1970), ‘Time and Event in Seneca's Troades’, WS n.s. 4, 118–137.Google Scholar
Paratore, E. (1956), Seneca: Tragedie. Rome.Google Scholar
Penwill, J.L. (1996), ‘The Ending of Sense: Death as Closure in Lucretius Book 6’, Ramus 25, 146–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, N. (1983), Seneca's Drama. Chapel Hill and London.Google Scholar
Putnam, M.C.J. (1995), Vergil's Aeneid: Interpretation and Influence. London.Google Scholar
Schetter, W. (1965), ‘Sulla struttura delle Troiane di Seneca’, RFIC 93, 396–429.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (2003), The Passions in Play: Thyestes and the Dynamics of Senecan Drama. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, E.A. (2003), ‘Zeit und Raum in Senecas Tragödien: Ein Beitrag zu seiner dramatischen Technik’, in Billerbeck and Schmidt (2003), 321–356.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R.J. (ed.) (1985), Seneca's Thyestes. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (1983), ‘The Tragic Mode of Seneca's Troades’, in Boyle (1983), 27–60.Google Scholar
Zehnacker, H. (ed.) (1981), Thèâtre et spectacles dans l'antiquité: actes du colloque de Strasbourg 5-7 novembre 1981. Leiden.Google Scholar