Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:51:26.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2022

Marguerite Johnson  and
Leah O'Hearn
Marguerite Johnson
Affiliation:
The University of Newcastle and La Trobe University Email: [email protected] and L.O'[email protected]
Leah O'Hearn
Affiliation:
The University of Newcastle and La Trobe University Email: [email protected] and L.O'[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Antichthon , Volume 55 , 2021 , pp. 1 - 5
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Australasian Society for Classical Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Copley, F. O. (1949), ‘Emotional Conflict and its Significance in the Lesbia-poems of Catullus’, AJPh 70, 22–40.Google Scholar
Deuling, J. (2006), ‘Catullus 17 and 67, and the Catullan Construct’, Antichthon 40, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. and Woodman, T. (eds.) (2021), The Cambridge Companion to Catullus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredricksmeyer, E. A. (1983), ‘The Beginning and the End of Catullus’ longus amor’, SO 58, 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. (ed.) (2007), Catullus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gnilka, C. (1973), ‘Lynchjustiz bei Catull’, RhM 116, 256–69.Google Scholar
Godwin, J. (2018), ‘The Ironic Epicurean in Poems 23, 114, 115’, Paideia 73, 837–51.Google Scholar
Greene, E. (2006), ‘Catullus, Caesar and Roman Masculine Identity’, Antichthon 40, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hexter, R. J. (2015). ‘The Kisses of Juventius, and Policing the Boundaries of Masculinity’, in Ingleheart, J. (ed.), Ancient Rome and the Construction of Modern Homosexual Identities. Oxford, 273–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillard, T. W. (1989), ‘Republican Politics, Women and the Evidence’, Helios 16, 165–82.Google Scholar
Janan, M. (1994), “When the Lamp is Shattered”: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale.Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. (1977), ‘Obscenity in Catullus’, Ramus 6, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGushin, P. (1967), ‘Catullus’ sanctae foedus amicitiae’, CPh 62, 85–93.Google Scholar
O'Hearn, L. (2021), ‘Being Beatus in Catullus’ Poems 9, 10, 22 and 23’, CQ 70, 691–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliensis, E. (2009), Freud's Rome: Psychoanalysis and Latin Poetry. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, H. D. (1976), ‘Catullus and the ‘Beauty’ of Lesbia (Poems 43, 86 and 51),’ Latomus 35, 3–11.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (ed.) (2007), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1997), ‘Ego mulier: The Construction of Male Sexuality in Catullus’, in Hallett, J. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.), Roman Sexualities. New Jersey, 129–50.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. B. (1979), ‘Parasites and Strange Bedfellows: A Study in Catullus’ Political Imagery’, Ramus 8, 137–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stead, H. (2015), A Cockney Catullus: The Reception of Catullus in Romantic Britain, 1795–1821. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Támas, Á. (2016), ‘Erroneous Gazes: Lucretian Poetics in Catullus 64’, JRS 106, 1–20.Google Scholar
Watson, L. (2006), ‘Catullus and the Poetics of Incest’, Antichthon 40, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, L. (2009), ‘Catullus and the Brothel-Creepers: Carmen 37’, Antichthon 43, 123–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, D. (2001), Catullus and the poetics of Roman manhood. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uden, J. (2006), ‘Embracing the Young Man in Love: Catullus 75 and the Comic Adulescens’, Antichthon 40, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar